Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:18:37.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anatexis and high-grade metamorphism in the Champira Dome, Malawi: petrological and Rb-Sr studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

H. W. Haslam ,
M. S. Brewer ,
A. E. Davis  and
D. P. F. Darbyshire
H. W. Haslam
Affiliation:
Institute of Geological Sciences, 64–78 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8NG
M. S. Brewer
Affiliation:
Institute of Geological Sciences, 64–78 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8NG
A. E. Davis
Affiliation:
Institute of Geological Sciences, 64–78 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8NG
D. P. F. Darbyshire
Affiliation:
Institute of Geological Sciences, 64–78 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8NG
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Banded gneisses and migmatites in the Champira Dome contain assemblages of the biotite-cordierite-almandine subfacies of the granulite facies. The banded gneisses represent a sequence of arkosic sediments metamorphosed to sillimanite-cordierite gneisses. The migmatites were derived from more argillaceous and potassic sediments, with lower oxidation ratios and lower Ba/Rb ratios. They consist of a quartzo-feldspathic leucosome, representing anatectic melt, with schlieren of the refractory minerals sillimanite, garnet, biotite, and oxide minerals. Cordierite developed from garnet and biotite, except in rocks of high FeO/(FeO + MgO) ratio. Both rock types contain assemblages of magnetite + hercynite + corundum + ilmenite + hematite, formed by unmixing of high-temperature solid solutions. Rb-Sr studies of the banded gneisses gave an age of 2327 ± 25 Ma, which is interpreted as the date of metamorphism, and an initial 87Sr/86Sr ratio of 0.7064 ± 0.0003. The migmatite samples plot close to this 2327 Ma regression line, but the strontium isotopes were considerably disturbed, though not homogenized on the scale of sampling, 962 ± 34 Ma ago. It is considered that the anatexis in the migmatites was contemporaneous with the metamorphism of the banded gneisses and that the 962 ± 34 Ma event may be correlated with recrystallization of the migmatites accompanying the growth of cordierite.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 43 , Issue 330 , June 1980 , pp. 701 - 714
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Present address: Bermuda College, Department of Academic Studies, Prospect Devonshire 4-04, Bermuda

References

Andrew, (E. M.), 1974. Rep. Inst. Geol. Sci. 74/15.Google Scholar
Ashworth, (J. R.) and Chinner, (G. A.), 1978. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 65, 379-94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bofinger, (V. M.) and Compston, (W.), 1967. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 31, 2353-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, (J. R.) Compston, (W.) and Gulson, (B. L.), 1970. Ibid. 34, 433-45.Google Scholar
Bowles, (J. F. W.), 1975. Rep. Inst. Geol. Sci. 75/9.Google Scholar
Brewer, (M. S.), Brook, (M.), and Powell, (D.), in press. In The Caledonides of the British Isles—reviewed 1979. Geol. Soc. Lond.Google Scholar
Brewer, (M. S.) Haslam, (H. W.), Darbyshire, (D. P. F.), and Davis, (A. E.), 1979a. Rep. Inst. Geol. Sci. 79/1.Google Scholar
Brewer, (M. S.) Haslam, (H. W.), Darbyshire, (D. P. F.), and Davis, (A. E.) 1979b. Ibid. 79/5.Google Scholar
Brook, (M.), Brewer, (M. S.), and Powell, (D.), 1976. Nature, 260, 515-17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buddington, (A. F.) and Lindsley, (D. H.), 1964. J. Petrol. 5, 310-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, (G. S.) and Bennett, (J. D.), 1973. Bull. Geol. Surv. Malawi, 6 (2nd revised edition).Google Scholar
Clifford, (T. N.), 1974. Spec. Pap. Geol. Soc. Am. 156.Google Scholar
Clifford, (T. N.) Gronow, (J.), Rex, (D. C.), and Burger, (A. J.), 1975. J. Petrol. 16, 54-88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Waard, (D.), 1965. Am. J. Sci. 263, 455-61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doig, (R.), 1977. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 88, 1843-56.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, (W. J.) and Adams, (S. J.), 1972. Analyst. 97, 828-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, (C. M.) and Compston, (W.), 1978. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 42, 1735-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heier, (K. S.) and Billings, (G. K.), 1970. In Handbook of geochemistry, Wedepohl, (K. H.) (ed.), Berlin-Heidelberg-New York (Springer), II/2,37D 1-4, 37G1-2, 37K1-3.Google Scholar
Hofmann, (A.) and Köhler, (H.), 1973. N. Jb. Miner. Abh. 119, 2, 163-87.Google Scholar
Holdaway, (M. J.), 1971. Am. J. Sci. 271, 97-131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holdaway, (M. J.) and Lee, (S. M.), 1977. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 63, 175-98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, (H. L.), 1968. J. Petrol. 9, 40-83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleeman, (A. W.), 1965. J. Geol. Soc. Aust. 12, 35-52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krogh, (T. E.) and Davis, (G. L.), 1973. Carnegie Inst. Washington Year Book. 72, 60l10.Google Scholar
Le Maitre, (R. W.), 1976. J. Petrol. 17, 589-637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margaritz, (M.) and Hofmann, (A. W.), 1978. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 42, 595-605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, (P. K.), Frost, (M. T.), and Reed, (S. J. B.), 1969. N.P.L. (I.M.S.), Report No. 2.Google Scholar
Moorbath, (S.), 1969. Scott. J. Geol. 5, 154-70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorbath, (S.) and Taylor, (P. N.), 1974. Nature, 250, 41-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, (R. W.), 1976. Carnegie Inst. Washington Year Book. 75, 813-21.Google Scholar
Pankhurst, (R. J.), 1974. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 85, 345-50.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, (E. R.), 1975. Bull. Geol. Surv. Malawi, 36.Google Scholar
Pidgeon, (R. T.) and Râheim, (A.), 1972. Norsk Geol. Tids-skrift. 52, 241-56.Google Scholar
Puchelt, (H.), 1972. In Handbook of geochemistry. Wede-pohl, (K. H.) (ed.), Berlin-Heidelberg-New York (Springer), 11/3, 56DI-18. 56G1, 56K1-8.Google Scholar
Purdy, (J. W.) and Jaeger, (E.), 1976. Mere. ist Geol. Min. Univ. Padova, 30.Google Scholar
Richardson, (S. W.), Gilbert, (M. C.), and Bell, (P. M.), 1969. Am. J. Sci. 267, 259-72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, (J. L.) and Davis, (A. E.), 1977. Rep. lnst. Geol. Sci. 77/3.Google Scholar
Snelling, (N. J.), Johnson, (R. L.), and Drysdall, (A. R.), 1972. Rec. Geol. Surv. Zambia. 12, 19-30.Google Scholar
Spanglet, (M.), Brueckner, (H. K.), and Senechal, (R. G.), 1978. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 89, 783-90.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stormer, (J. C.), 1975. Am. Mineral. 60, 667-74.Google Scholar
Stueber, (A. M.) and Heimlich, (R. A.), 1977. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 88, 441-4.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tait, (B. A. R.) and Coats, (J. S.), 1976. Rep. Inst. Geol. Sci. 76/11.Google Scholar
Turnock, (A. C.) and Eugster, (H. P.), 1962. J. Petrol. 3, 533-65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuttle, (O. F.) and Bowen, (N. L.), 1958. Geol. Soc. Am. Mere. 74.Google Scholar
Williamson, (J. H.), 1968. Can. J. Phys. 46, 1845-7.Google Scholar
Winkler, (H. G. F.), 1976. Petrogenesis of metamorphic rocks(4th edition). New York-Heidelberg-Berlin (Springer-Verlag).CrossRefGoogle Scholar