Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T09:07:03.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An investigation into arsenic(V) removal from aqueous solutions by hydroxylapatite and bone-char

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

I. R. Sneddon ,
H. Garelick  and
E. Valsami-Jones
I. R. Sneddon
Affiliation:
School of Health and Social Sciences, Middlesex University, Queensway, Enfield, Middlesex EN3 4SA, UK
H. Garelick*
Affiliation:
School of Health and Social Sciences, Middlesex University, Queensway, Enfield, Middlesex EN3 4SA, UK
E. Valsami-Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Arsenic(V) removal from aqueous solution following addition of either a mixture of synthetic hydroxylapatite and baryte or bone-char is discussed. Arsenic concentrations of 4, 10 and 100 mg/l were investigated and additions of 0.2—10 g/l of solid (hydroxylapatite, baryte or bone-char) were tested, at an initial pH of either 5 or 7. Although the mixture of hydroxylapatite and baryte had a small influence on arsenic concentrations, bone-char was found to be a very effective sorbing agent for arsenic(V). Packed-column studies to investigate the bone-char capacity, followed by leaching tests were carried out. The capacity of bone-char was found to be superior to that of granular activated carbon. The experiments presented here indicate that the mechanism involved is adsorption rather than co-precipitation.

Keywords

arsenicbone-charhydroxylapatitebarytegranular activated carbonadsorptionremediation
Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 69 , Issue 5 , October 2005 , pp. 769 - 780
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Present address: Cawthorn Institute, 98 Halifax St. East, Private Bag 2, Nelson, New Zealand

References

Bothe, J.V. and Brown, P.W. (1999) Arsenic immobilization by calcium arsenate formation. Environmental Science and Technology, 33, 3806–3811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darland, J.E. and Inskeep, W.P. (1997) Effects of pH and phosphate competition on the transport of arsenate. Journal of Environmental Quality, 26, 1133–1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donahue, R., Hendry, M.J. and Landine, P. (2000) Distribution of arsenic and nickel in uranium mill tailings, Rabbit Lake, Saskatchewan, Canada. Applied Geochemistry, 15, 1097–1119.Google Scholar
Dzombak, D.A. and Morel, F.M.M. (1990) Surface Complexation Modelling: Hydrous Ferric Oxide, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. (2002) Competitive adsorption of arsenate and arsenite on oxides and clay minerals. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66, 413—421.Google Scholar
Gupta, S.K.and Chen, K.Y. (1978) Arsenic removal by adsorption. Water Pollution Control Federation Journal, 50, 493–506.Google Scholar
Hering, J.G., Chen, P., Wilkie, J.A., Elimelech, M. and Liang, S. (1996) Arsenic removal by ferric chloride. Journal of the American Water Works Association, 88, 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodson, M.E., Valsami-Jones, E. and Cotter-Howells, J.D. (2000) Bonemeal additions as a remediation treatment for metal contaminated soil. Environmental Science and Technology, 34, 3501–3507.Google Scholar
Hodson, M.E., Valsami-Jones, E., Cotter-Howells, J.D., Dubbin, W.E., Kemp, A.J. and Warren, A. (2001) Effect of bone meal (calcium phosphate) amendments on metal release from contaminated soils - a leaching column study. Environmental Pollution, 112, 233–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LeGeros, R.Z. and LeGeros, J.P. (1984) Phosphate minerals in human tissues. Pp. 351–385 in: Phosphate Minerals (Nriagu, J.O. and Moore, P.B., editors). Springer-Verlag, London.Google Scholar
Liu, F., De Cristofaro, A. and Violante, A. (2001) Effect of pH, phosphate and oxalate on the adsorption/ desorption of arsenate on/from goethite. Soil Science, 166, 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livesey, N.T. and Huang, P.M. (1981) Adsorption of arsenate by soils and its relation to selected chemical properties and anions. Soil Science, 131, 88—94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, Q.Y., Traina, S.J., Logan, T.J. and Ryan, J.A. (1993) In-situ lead immobilization by apatite. Environmental Science and Technology, 27, 1803–1810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matis, K.A., Zouboulis, A.I., Malamis, F.B., Afonso, M.D.R. and Hudson, M.J. (1997) Flotation removal of As(V) onto goethite. Environmental Pollution, 97, 239–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthess, G. (1981) In situ treatment of arsenic contaminated groundwater. Science of the Total Environment, 21, 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morel, F.M.M. and Hering, J.G. (1993) Principles and Applications of Aquatic Chemistry, Wiley, New York, 588 pp.Google Scholar
Patel, P.N. and Panda, K.K. (1995) Preparation and characterization of barium hydroxylapatite with arsenate. Journal of the Indian Chemical Society, 72, 467–468.Google Scholar
Peryea, F.J. and Kammereck, R. (1997) Phosphate-enhanced movement of arsenic out of lead arsenate contaminated topsoil and through uncontaminated subsoil. Water Air and Soil Pollution, 93, 243–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smedley, P.L. and Kinniburgh, D.G. (2002) A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Applied Geochemistry, 17, 517–568.Google Scholar
Stumm, W. and Morgan, J.J. (1996) Aquatic Chemistry, 3rd edition. Wiley, New York, 1022 pp.Google Scholar
Thornton, I. and Farago, M. (1990) The geochemistry of arsenic. Pp. 153–161 in: Arsenic: Exposure and Health Effects (Abernathy, CO., Calderon, R.L. and Chappell, W.R., editors). Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
US EPA (1992) The toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP). In; Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes, SW-846 Method 1311.Google Scholar
US EPA (2000) Technologies and costs for removal of arsenic from drinking water. Office of Water, US EPA Fact sheet 815-R-00-028.Google Scholar
US EPA (2001) Drinking Water Standard for Arsenic. US EPA Fact sheet 815-F-00-015.Google Scholar
Valsami-Jones, E., Ragnarsdottir, K.V., Putnis, A., Bosbach, D., Kemp, A.J. and Cressey, G. (1998) The dissolution of apatite in the presence of aqueous metal cations at pH 2—7. Chemical Geology, 151, 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Violante, A. and Pigna, M. (2002) Competitive sorption of arsenate and phosphate on different clay minerals and soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66, 1788–1796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagemann, R. (1978) Some theoretical aspects of stability and solubility of inorganic arsenic in the freshwater environment. Water Research, 12, 139–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zouboulis, A.I., Kydros, K.A. and Matis, K.A. (1993) Arsenic(HI) and arsenic(V) removal from solutions by pyrite fines. Separation Science and Technology, 28, 2449–2463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar