Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:33:44.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Subsolidus solubility between : a hydrothermal investigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

R. S. Bradley ,
P. Engel  and
D. C. Munro
R. S. Bradley
Affiliation:
Department of Inorganic and Structural Chemistry, University of Leeds
P. Engel
Affiliation:
Department of Inorganic and Structural Chemistry, University of Leeds
D. C. Munro
Affiliation:
Department of Inorganic and Structural Chemistry, University of Leeds
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The subsolidus phase equilibrium of the lithiophilite-tephroite system was studied in the temperature range 500 to 900° C. The solubility of tephroite in lithiophilite is limited and increases with temperature. The reaction is very sluggish and has peculiar kinetic properties. No reverse solubility was observed. Similar asymmetry was found in the LiMgPO4-forsterite system of which a preliminary study was made. Apparent absences of silicate phosphate olivine solid solutions in nature are related to our experimental findings and to geological factors.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 35 , Issue 273 , March 1966 , pp. 742 - 755
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberman, (K. B.), Blakey, (R. C.), and Anderson, (J. S.), 1951. Journ. Chem. Soc., p. 1352 [M.A. 11-433].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, (N. L.) and Tuttle, (O. F.), 1949. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., vol. 60, p. 439 [M.A. 11-93].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, (R. S.), 1962. Amer. Journ. Sci., vol. 260, p. 550 [M.A. 15-522].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennen, (W. H.) and Shields, (R.), 1956. Amer. Min. vol. 41, p. 655 [M.A. 13 375].Google Scholar
Fersman, (A. E.), 1931. Les pegmatites, Acad. Sci. URSS, pp. 55, 414, and 402.Google Scholar
Fyfe, (W. S.), Turner, (F. J.), and Verhoogen, (J.), 1958. Metamorphic Reactions and Metamorphic Facies, Geol. Soc. Amer., Memoir 73, p. 80 [M.A. 14-88].Google Scholar
Geller, (S.) and Durand, (J. L.), 1960. Acta Cryst. vol. 13, p. 325.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, (J. R.) and Heard, (H. C.), 1961. Journ. Geol., Chicago, vol. 69, p. 45 [M.A. 15-275].Google Scholar
Hägele, (G.) and Machatschki, (F.), 1939. Naturwiss., vol. 27, p. 132 [M.A. 7-395].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harker, (R. I.) and Tuttle, (O. F.), 1955. Amer. Journ. Sci., vol. 253, p. 274 [M.A. 13-176].Google Scholar
Hava, (S.), 1938. [Sci. Papers Inst. Phys. Chem. Research Tokyo, vol. 34, p. 619]; abstr. M.A. 7-264.Google Scholar
Hey, (M. H.), 1962. Chemical Index of Minerals, British Museum (Natural History), p. 214.Google Scholar
Jefford, (G.), 1962. Amer. Min., vol. 47, p. 1469.Google Scholar
Kennedy, (G. C.), 1959. Amer. Journ. Sci., vol. 257, p. 567 [M.A. 14-335].Google Scholar
Kimura, (K.) and Hironaka, (Y.), 1936. [Journ. Chem. Soc. Japan, vol. 57, p. 1195]; abstr. M.A. 7-263.Google Scholar
King, (E. A., Jr.), 1961. Amer. Min., vol. 46, p. 747 [M.A. 15-395].Google Scholar
Koritnig, (S.), 1964. Naturwiss. vol. 51, p. 633.Google Scholar
Mcconnell, (D.), 1937. Amer. Min., vol. 22, p. 977 [M.A. 7-14].Google Scholar
Mcconnell, (D.), 1952. Ibid., vol. 37, p. 609 [M.A. 12-169].Google Scholar
Machatschki, (F.), 1942. Zentr. Min. Geol. Paleont., Abt. A, p. 1 [M.A. 8-303].Google Scholar
Mason, (B.) and Berggren, (T.), 1941. [Geol. FLr. FLrh., vol. 63, p. 413]; abstr. M.A. 8-338.Google Scholar
Mays, (J. M.), 1963. Physical Reviews, vol. 131, p. 38.Google Scholar
Merker, (L.) and Wondratschek, (H.), 1960. Zeit. Krist. vol. 113, p. 475.Google Scholar
Miller, (W. S.), Dachille, (F.), Shafer, (E. C.), and Roy, (R.), 1963. Amer. Min., vol. 48, p. 1024 [M.A. 16-527].Google Scholar
Nicolas, (J.) and Rosen, (A.), 1963. Bull. Soc. franç. Min. Crist., vol. 86, p. 383.Google Scholar
O'DANIEL, (H.) and Tscheischwili, (L.), 1944. Structure Reports, vol. 9, p. 261 [M.A. 9-231].Google Scholar
Robin, (J.), 1953. Bull. Soc. Chim. France, Mémoires, p. 1078.Google Scholar
Robinson, (P.) and Mccartney, (E. R.), 1964. Journ. Amer. Ceram. Soe., vol. 47, p. 587.Google Scholar
Roseneerg, (P. E.), 1963. Amer. Min. vol. 48, p. 1397 [M.A. 16-623].Google Scholar
Slater, (J. J.), 1964. Journ. Chem. Physics, vol. 4l, p. 3199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thilo, (E.), 1941. Naturwiss., vol. 29, p. 239 [M.A. 8-220].Google Scholar
Tschermak, (G.), 1864. [Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, vol. 50, p. 566] ; abstr, in Eitel, (W.), 1958, Geol. Soc. Amer., Special Paper 66, p. 53 [M.A. 14-89].Google Scholar
Turner, (F. J.) and Verhoogen, (J.), 1951. Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology, p. 332, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Tuttle, (O. F.), 1949. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., vol. 60, p. 1727.Google Scholar
Wyart, (J.) and Sabatier, (G.), 1958. Bull. Soc. franç. Min. Crist., vol. 81, p. 223 [M.A. 14-332].Google Scholar
Wylie, (A. W.), 1948. Nature, vol. 161, p. 97 [M.A. 10-538].Google Scholar
Zen, (E-An), 1956. Amer. Min., vol. 41, p. 523 [M.A. 13-198].Google Scholar