Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:23:09.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A study of the calc-gneisses, scapolite-gneisses, and cordierite-garnet-sillimanite-rocks of Coimbatore, Madras Presidency; with comparison to other similar occurrences in India1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2018

L. A. Narayana Iyer*
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of India

Extract

The Indian peninsula, though considered to be a very stable part the earth's crust and hence called the 'Indian Shield', shows in different parts evidence of formerly having sustained epicontinental basins, in which sedimentation occurred. These sediments are now found in detached prisms as crystalline gneisses and schists in different parts of India, e.g. in the Madras Presidency, Bihar and Orissa, Central Provinces, Central India, and Rajputana. They have been found overlying the ancient gneigses (Archaean), and belong to a division known in Indian geology as the Dharwar System.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1929

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Published by permission of the Director, Geological Survey of India.

References

page 122 note 1 Middlemiss, C. S., Journ. Asiatic Soc. Bengal, 1917, n. ser., vol. 13, pp. cxcvccii.Google Scholar

page 122 note 2 Middlemiss, C. S., Mere. Geol. Survey India, 1921, vol. 44, pp. 4243.Google Scholar

page 122 note 3 Lacroix, A., Bull. Soc. Franç. Min., 1889, vol. 12, p. 282.Google Scholar

page 122 note 4 Lacroix, A., Rec. Geol. Survey India, 1891, vol. 24, p. 155.Google Scholar

page 125 note 1 I. C. Chacko, Geol. Mag., 1916, dec. 6, vol. 3, p. 462.

page 125 note 2 Krishnan, M. S., Min. Mag., 1924, vol. 20, p. 248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 128 note 1 F. D. Adams and A. E. Barlow, Geology of Bancroft and Halliburton areas, Province of Ontario. Geol. Survey Canada, 1910, Mem. no. 6, pp. 102-113.

page 128 note 2 Burton, R. C., Rec. Geol. Survey India, 1915, vol. 45, p. 102.Google Scholar

page 128 note 3 Walker, T. L.. Mere. Geol. Survey India, 1901, vol. 33, p. 8.Google Scholar

page 129 note 1 E. W. Vredenburg, A summary of the geology of India, 2nd edit., 1910, p. 14.

page 129 note 2 King, W. B. and Foote, R. B., Mem. Geol. Survey India, 1879, vol. 16, pp. 1214.Google Scholar

page 129 note 3 L. L. Fermor, Ibid., 1909, vol. 37, p. 1046.

page 129 note 4 L. L. Fermor, Ree. Geol. Survey India, 1916, vol. 47, pp. 34-35.

page 129 note 5 R. C. Burton, Ibid., 1915, vol. 45, p. 133.

page 129 note 6 W. D. West, Ibid., 1925, vol. 59, pp. 75-81.

page 129 note 7 General Report, Ibid., 1926, vol. 60, p. 97.

page 130 note 1 Holland, T. H., Mere. Geol. Survey India, 1900, vol. 28, p. 232.Google Scholar

page 130 note 2 L. L. Fermor, Ibid., 1909, vol. 37, p. 1112.

page 130 note 3 Brown, C. B. and Judd, J. W., Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., 1896, vol. 187, p. 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 130 note 4 L. L. Fermor, Rec. Geol. Survey India, 1915, vol. 45, p. 100, and 1906, vol. 33, pp. 166-171.

page 130 note 5 C. S. Middlemiss, Journ. Asiatic Soc. Bengal, 1917, n. ser., vol. 13, pp. cxcv-ccii.

page 130 note 6 Middlemiss, C. S., Mere. Geol. Survey India, 1921, vol. 44, p. 59.Google Scholar

page 131 note 1 F. D. Adams and A. E. Barlow, toe. cir., 1910, pp. 87, 88.

page 132 note 1 G. W. Tyrrell, The principles of petrology, 1926, p. 258.

page 132 note 2 U. Grubenmann and P. Niggli, Die Gesteinsmetamorphose, 1924, pp. 375-390.

page 132 note 3 L. L. Fermor, Garnet as a geological barometer, Ree. Geol. Survey India, 1913, vol. 43, pp. 41-44.

page 134 note 1 T. H. Holland, Rec. Geol. Survey India, 1896, vol. 29, p. 23.

page 134 note 2 E. W. Vredenburg, Ibid., 1904, vol. 31, p. 233.