Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T22:14:04.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the zeolites. Part I. General review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Max H. Hey
Max H. Hey*
Affiliation:
Mineral Department of the British Museum of Natural History
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The zeolites form a group of minerals of considerable interest by reason of their peculiar properties. In particular, their remarkable continuous dehydration curves, in part reversible, and the ready base-exchange of some members have attracted attention. But in spite of much work, many important characters remain quite uncertain. Many of the zeolites show variations in composition which are not recognized or are incorrectly interpreted by the accepted formulae. Optical investigation has all too rarely been made on analysed material, and little is known of the variation of the optical properties of most members with their composition, and practically nothing of the variations consequent on artificial base-exchange reactions. In spite of much work, conflicting views are still held as to the interpretation of the dehydration results. In some instances even the crystal-system is still uncertain.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 22 , Issue 131 , December 1930 , pp. 422 - 437
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1930

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1850 J. T., Way, Journ. Roy. Agric. Soc., vol. 11, p. 313.Google Scholar
1852 J. T., Way, Journ. Roy. Agric. Soc., vol. 13, p. 123.Google Scholar
1854 J. T., Way, Journ. Roy. Agric. Soc., vol. 15, p. 491.Google Scholar
1857 A., Damour, Compt. Rend. Acad. Ser. Paris, vol. 44, p. 975.Google Scholar
1858 A., Damour, Ann. Chim. Phys., ser. 3, vol. 53, p. 454.Google Scholar
1858 H., Eichitorn, Ann. Phys. Chem. (Poggendorff), vol. 105, p. 130.Google Scholar
1862 B. Von, Ammon, [Inaug.-Diss., Köln, 1862], Jahresber. Chem. (Kopp and Will), 1862, p. 138.Google Scholar
1862 H. Sainte-Claire, Deville, Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris, vol. 54, p. 324.Google Scholar
1876 J., Lemberg, Zeits. Deutsch. Geol. Gesell., vol. 28, p. 519.Google Scholar
1877 J., Lemberg, Zeits. Deutsch. Geol. Gesell., vol. 29, p. 457.Google Scholar
1878 K., Dalmer, Neues Jahrb. Min., p. 257.Google Scholar
1879 W., Fresenius, Zeits. Kryst. Min., vol. 3, p. 25.Google Scholar
1881 A. F. W., Schimper, Zeits. Kryst. Min., vol. 5, p. 131.Google Scholar
1882 E., Mallard, Dull. Soc. Min. Trance, vol. 5, p. 255.Google Scholar
1883 J., Lemberg, Zeits. Deutsch. Geol. Gesell., vol. 35, p. 557.Google Scholar
1885 J., Lemberg, Zeits. Deutsch. Geol. Gesell., vol. 37, p. 959.Google Scholar
1892 S. J., Thugutt, Zeits. Anorg. Chem., vol. 2, p. 65.Google Scholar
1894 F. W., Clarke, Amer. Journ. Sci., ser. 3, vol. 48, p. 187.Google Scholar
1895 S. J., Thugutt, Neues Jahrb. Min., Beil.-Bd. 9. p. 554.Google Scholar
1896 G., Friedel, Compt. Rend. Aead. Sci. Paris, vol. 122, p. 1006; Bull. Soc. Franç. Min., vol. 19, p. 94.Google Scholar
1896 F., Rinne, Neues Jahrb. Min., vol. 1, p. 24.Google Scholar
1897 H., Buxhoevden and G., Tammann, Zeits. Anorg. Chem., vol. 15, p. 319.Google Scholar
1897 F., Rinne, Neues Jahrh. Min., vol. 1, p. 40.Google Scholar
1897 F., Rinne, Neues Jahrb. Min., vol. 2, p. 28.Google Scholar
1897 G., Tammann, Ann. Phys. Chem. (Wiedemann), vol. 63, p. 16.Google Scholar
1897 G., Tammann, Zeits. Physik. Chem., vol. 27, p. 325.Google Scholar
1898 G., Bodländer, Neues Jahrb. Min., Deil.-Bd. 12, p. 52.Google Scholar
1899 A. H., Church, Min. Mag., vol. 12, p. ix.Google Scholar
1899 F. W., Clarke and G., Steiger, Amer. Journ. Sci., ser. 4, vol. 8, p. 245; Zeits. Auorg. Chem., vol. 23, p. 135.Google Scholar
1899 F., Rinse, Neues Jahrb. Min., vol. 1, p. 1.Google Scholar
1900 F. W., Clarke and G., Sterner, Amer. Journ. Sci., ser. 4, vol. 9, pp. 117, 345; Zeits. Anorg. Chem., vol. 24, pp. 135, 139.Google Scholar
1900 G., Wyrouboff, Bull. Soc. Franç. Min., vol. 23, p. 65.Google Scholar
1902 F. W., Clarke and G., Steiger, Amer. Journ. Sci., ser. 4, vol. 13, p. 27; Zeits. Anorg. Chem., vol. 29, p. 338; Bull. U.S. Geol. Survey, no. 207.Google Scholar
1902 F., Rinse, Centr. Min., p. 594.Google Scholar
1902 E., Sommerfeldt, [Habilitationsschrift, Tübingen, 1902]. Quoted by F. Zambonini, 1906 (see below).Google Scholar
1902 G., Sterner, Amer. Journ. Sci., ser. 4, vol. 14, p. 31.Google Scholar
1903 A., Johnsen, Neues Jahrb. Min., vol. 2, p. 130.Google Scholar
1903 G., Tschermak, Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-naturwiss. Kl., Abt. I, vol. 112, p. 355.Google Scholar
1905 F. W., Clarke, Zeits. Anorg. Chem., vol. 46, p. 197.Google Scholar
1905 C., Doelter, Physikalisch-Chemische Mineralogie (Leipzig, 1905), p. 179.Google Scholar
1905 R., Gans, Jahrb. Preuss. Geol. Landesanst., vol. 26, p. 179.Google Scholar
1905 G., Steiger, Bull. U.S. Geol. Survey, no. 262, p. 75.Google Scholar
1905 G., Tschermak, Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-naturwiss. Kl., Abt. I, vol. 114, p. 455; zeits. Physik. Chem., vol. 53, p. 349.Google Scholar
1905 F., Zambonini, Atti (Mem.) Aecad. Lincei, Cl. Sci. fis. mat. nat. Roma, ser. 5, vol. 5, p. 344.Google Scholar
1906 R., Gans, Jahrb. Preuss. Geol. Landesanst., vol. 27, p. 63.Google Scholar
1906 G., Tschermak, Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-naturwiss. Kl., Abt. I, vol. 115. p. 217.Google Scholar
1906 F., Zambonini, Atti (Mem.) Acead. Lincei, Cl. Sci. fis. mat. nat. Roma, ser. 5, vol. 6, p. 102.Google Scholar
1908 J. Van, Bemmelen, Zeits. Anorg. Chem., vol. 59, p. 225.Google Scholar
1908 O., Mügge, Centr. Min., pp. 129, 325.Google Scholar
1908 G., Tschermak, Centr. Min., p. 225.Google Scholar
1908 F., Zambonini, Atti Acead. Sci. Fis. Mat. Napoli. set. 2, vol. 14, pp. 88, 116, 297.Google Scholar
1909 F., Löwenstein. Zeits. Anorg. Chem, vol. 63, p. 69.Google Scholar
1909 G., Tschermak, Zeits. Anorg. Chem., vol. 63, p. 230.Google Scholar
1910 F., Grandjean, Bull. Soc. Franç. Min., vol. 33, p. 5.Google Scholar
1910 F., Singer, Dissertation, Berlin. 1910. ‘Ueber künstliche Zeolithe.’Google Scholar
1912 G., Tschermak, Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-naturwiss. Kl., Abt. IIb, vol. 121, p. 1087.Google Scholar
1913 F., Rinne, Fortschr. Min. Krist. Petr., vol. 3, p. 159.Google Scholar
1913 M., Theile, [Inaug,-Diss., Leipzig, 1913], Neues Jahrb. Min., 1915, vol. 1, Ref. p. 16.Google Scholar
1914 G., Daikuhara, Bull. Imp. Centr. Agric. Exp. Star. Japan, vol. 2, p. 1.Google Scholar
1914 A., Günther-Schulze, Zeits. Physik. Chem., vol. 89, p. 168.Google Scholar
1915 A., Beutell and K., Blaschke, Centr. Min., pp. 4, 142, 195. [Min. Abstr., vol. 1, p. 153.]Google Scholar
1915 H., Schneiderhohn, Neues Jahrb. Min., Beil.-Bd., 40, p. 163. [M.A. 1-234.]Google Scholar
1915 I., Zoch, Chemie der Erde, vol. 1, p. 219. [M.A. 4-371.]Google Scholar
1917 G., Tschermak, Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-naturwiss. Kl., Abt. I, vol. 126, p. 541. [M.A. 2-302.]Google Scholar
1918 G., Stoklossa, Neues Jahrb. Min., Beil.-Bd. 42, p. 1. [M.A. 1-153.]Google Scholar
1918 G., Tschermak, Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-naturwiss. Kl., Abt. I, vol. 127, p. 177. [M.A. 2-302.]Google Scholar
1919 O., Weigel, Sitzungsber. Gesell. Naturwiss. Marburg, p. 48. [M.A. 2-57.]Google Scholar
1920 F., Rinne, Ber. Sächs. Akad. Wiss. Leipzig, Math.-phys. Kl., vol. 72, p. 12. [M.A. 4-372.]Google Scholar
1921 A., Beutell, Centr. Min., pp. 694, 721. [M.A. 2-57.]Google Scholar
1921 R., Nacken and W., Wolff, Centr. Min., pp. 364, 388. [M.A. 2-56.]Google Scholar
1921 K. H., Scheumann, Ber. Sächs. Akad. Wiss. Leipzig, Math.-phys. Kl., vol. 73, p. 3. [M.A. 4-372.]Google Scholar
1921 R., Seeliger, Physikal. Zeits., vol. 22, p. 563. [M.A. 4-373.]Google Scholar
1922 O., Weigel, Centr. Min., pp. 164, 201. [M.A. 2-57.]Google Scholar
1923 O., Weigel, Zeits. Krist., vol. 58, p. 183. [M.A. 2-300.]Google Scholar
1924 O., Weigel, Sitzungsber. Gesell. Naturwiss. Marburg, p. 107. [M.A. 4-373.]Google Scholar
1925 O., Weigel and E., Steinhoff, Zeits. Krist., vol. 61, p. 125. [M.A. 2-528.]Google Scholar
1925 V., Rothmund, Rec. Tray. Chim. Pays-Bas, vol. 44, p. 329.Google Scholar
1925 A. N., Winchell, Amer, Min., vol. 10, pp. 88, ll2, 145, 166. [M.A. 3-13.]Google Scholar
1926 V., Rothmund. Zeits. Elektrochem., vol. 32, p. 367.Google Scholar
1927 P. S., Burgess and W. T., McGeorge, Univ. Arizona, Coll. Agrie. Techn. Bull., no. 15.Google Scholar
1927 A., Cavinato, Atti (Mere.) R. Aecad. Lincei, Cl. Sci. fis. mat. nat. Roma, ser. 6, vol. 2, p. 320. [M.A, 4-320.]Google Scholar
1927 F. M., Jaeger, H. G. K., Westerbrink, and F. A. Van, Melle, Proc. Sect. Sei. Akad. Wiss. Amsterdam, vol. 30, p. 249.Google Scholar
1927 F. M., Jaeger and F. A. Van, Melee, Proc. Sect. Sci. Akad. Wiss. Amsterdam, vol. 30. pp. 479, 885.Google Scholar
1928 H., Kappen and B., Fischer, Zeits. Pflanzenernährung, Düngung und Bodenkunde, Teil A, vol. 12, p. 8. [M.A. 4-317.]Google Scholar
1928 O. C., Magistad, Univ. Arizona, Coll. Agric. Techn. Bull., no. 22.Google Scholar
1929 F. M., Jaeger, Proc. Sect. Sei. Akad. Wiss. Amsterdam, vol. 32, p. 156.Google Scholar
1929 F. M., Jaeger and F. A. Van, Müller, Proc. Sect. Sei. Akad. Wiss. Amsterdam, vol. 32, p. 167.Google Scholar
1929 O. C., Magistad, Journ. Amer. Soc. Agronomy, vol. 21, p. 1045.Google Scholar
1929 G., Weigher and K., Müller, Zeits. Pflanzenernährung, Düngung und Bodenkunde, Tell A, vol. 14, p. 321. [M.A. 4-317.]Google Scholar
1930 W. L., Bragg, lecture to Min. Soc., March 3, 1930; the same subject-matter appears in Zeits. Krist., vol. 74, p. 237. [M.A 4-354.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1930 S. B., Hennricks and W. H., Fry, Soil Science, vol. 29, p. 457.Google Scholar
1930 C. E., Marshall, Trans. Faraday Soc., vol. 26, p. 173.Google Scholar
1930 W. H., Taylor, Zeits. Krist., vol. 74, p. 1. [M.A. 4-369.]Google Scholar