Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T03:52:20.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some relationships between the reflectivities of sulphide ore-minerals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

F. Coles Phillips
F. Coles Phillips*
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy and Petrology, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since the early work of Dmde and others on the reflection of light by opaque crystalline media, little progress has been made in the direct determination of the indices of refraction and absorption for such substances. Interest in the optical properties of the opaque minerals, however, has been greatly stimulated by the rapid development in the last few years of the methods of ore-microscopy first brought into prominence by Campbell in 1906. Full theoretical discussions have been given recently by Berek, Koenigsberger, and others, but the only quantitative measure feasible in routine microscopy at present is that of the reflectivity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 23 , Issue 143 , December 1933 , pp. 458 - 462
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 458 note 1 Berek, M., Zeits. Krist., 1931, vol. 76, pp. 396–430 Google Scholar; ibid., vol. 77, pp. 1-22 ; ibid., vol. 80, pp. 18-36 ; Neues Jahrb. Min., Abt. A, 1931, Beil.-Bd. 64, pp. 123- 136. [Min. Abstr., vol. 5, pp. 122-123.]

page 458 note 2 J. Koenigsberger, Neues Jahrb. Min., Abt. A, 1931, Beil.-Bd. 64, pp. 107-121.

page 458 note 3 Schneiderhühn, H., Centr. Min., Abt. A, 1928, pp. 394–396.Google Scholar

page 458 note 4 Berek, M., Zeits. Krist., 1931. vol. 77, pp. 6–21.Google Scholar

page 458 note 5 Orcel, J., Bull. Soc. franç. Min., 1930, vol. 53, pp. 301–349.Google Scholar [M.A. 4-444.]

page 458 note 6 6 A. Cissarz, Neues Jahrb. Min., Abt. A, 1931, Beil.-Bd. 64, p. 158. [M.A. 5-125.]

page 459 note 1 M. Berek, loc. eit., p. 4.

page 459 note 2 Cissarz, A., Zeits. Krist., 1932, vol. 82, pp. 438–450.Google Scholar [M.A. 5-205.]

page 459 note 3 H. SehneiderhSbn and P. Ramdohr, Lehrbueh der Erzmikroskopie, vol. 2, Berlin, 1931. [M.A. 4-434.]

page 459 note 4 Phillips, F. C., Nature, London, 1932, vol. 130, p. 998.Google Scholar [M.A. 5-206.]

page 460 note 1 Wright, F. E., Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc., 1919, vol. 58, p. 426.Google Scholar [M.A. 1-198.]

page 460 note 2 Tyndall, E. P. T., Physical Rev., 1923, vol. 21, p. 180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 460 note 3 J. Orcel, loc. cit., p. 302

page 460 note 4 Shannon, E. V., Amer. Journ. Sci., 1920, ser. 4, vol. 50, p. 391.Google Scholar [M.A. 1-144.]

page 461 note 1 Fajans, K. and Joos, G., Zeits. Physik, 1924, vol. 23, p. 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 462 note 1 Wasastjerna, J. A., Soc. Sci. Fennica Comm. Phys.Math., 1923, vol. 1 Google Scholar, no. 37.

page 462 note 2 Haase, M., Zeits. Krist., 1927, vol 65, p. 581 Google Scholar. [M.A. 3-421.]