Sinhalite (MgAlB04), a new mineral. (With Plate XXVII)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 March 2018
Extract
The investigation which has led to this description of a new mineral began because of a suggestion by Dr. W. F. Foshag, when on a Visit in 1951 to the Mineral Gallery of the British Museum (Natural History), that a brown cut gemstone exhibited as olivine had perhaps been incorrectly determined. More recently, Dr. Foshag has stated that the idea came from Dr. George Switzer, who as a result of an X-ray powder photograph taken in June 1950 of a similar specimen in the collection of the United States National Museum in Washington concluded that his material was not olivine and was likely to be a new species. The present work would not have been pursued had it been realized at the time that Dr. Switzer intended to continue the study when he had suitable material for analysis.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 29 , Issue 217 , June 1952 , pp. 841 - 849
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1952
References
page 841 note 1 Winchell, A. N., Elements of optical mineralogy, pt. II, 1933, p. 191.Google Scholar
page 847 note 1 Farquhar, M. C. M. and Lipson, H., Proc. Physical Soc., 1946, vol. 58, p. 200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 847 note 2 W.L. Bragg, Atomic structure of minerals, 1937, p. 147; axial ratios misprinted as 0.4567: 1: 0.5862.
page 847 note 3 Schulek, E. and Vastagh, G., Zeits. Anal. Chem., 1931, vol. 84, p. 167 Google Scholar; 1932, vol. 87, p. 195.
page 849 note 1 Ebelmen, J. J., Ann. Chim. Phys., 1848, ser. 3, vol. 22, p. 213 Google Scholar; 1851, ser. 3, vol. 33, p. 34.
page 849 note 2 B. W. Anderson, Gem testing for jewellers, 1942, pp. 151, 183. [M.A. 8-309.[
- 9
- Cited by