Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T12:19:05.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prehnitization in the Yahgan Formation of Navarino Island, southernmost Chile

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

W. A. Watters
W. A. Watters*
Affiliation:
New Zealand Geological Survey, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Upper Mesozoic geosynclinal sedimentary rocks, mainly of volcanic (andesitic) derivation, show widespread prehnitization caused by very low grade metamorphism (burial metamorphism). The sediments, which include greywackes, argillites, cherty rocks, and occasional limestone concretions and thin beds, appear little altered in hand specimen and in the field despite the wide extent of recrystalli-zation. Besides prehnite, secondary minerals include quartz, albite, chlorite, sericite, calcite, and sphene. The different modes of occurrence of the prehnite are described and briefly discussed. The alteration of the rocks is compared with similar wide-spread prehnitization recorded in probably correlative rocks on South Georgia.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 34 , Issue 268 , 1965 , pp. 517 - 527
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartti, (T. F. W.) and Holmsen, (P.), 1939. Sci. Res. Norweg. Antarct. Exped., Norsk Vidensk. Akad., Oslo, vol. 2, no. 18.Google Scholar
Brown, (C. Ervin) and Tgayer, (T.P.), 1963. Journ. Sed. Petr., vol. 33, p. 411.Google Scholar
Coombs, (D.S.), 1954. Trans. Roy. Soc. N.Z., vol. 82, p. 65.Google Scholar
Coombs, (D.S.), 1960. Rep. 21.t Intern. Geol. Congr., Norden, pt. 13, p. 339.Google Scholar
Coombs, (D.S.), 1961. Australian Journ. Sci., vol. 24, p. 203.Google Scholar
Ellis, (A.J.), Fyfe, (W.S.), and Taylor, (A.H.), 1959. Ceochim. Cosnaochim. Acta, vol. 17, p. 53.Google Scholar
Crook, (Keith A. W.), 1960. Journ. Sed. Petr., vol. 30, p. 353.Google Scholar
Dana, (James Dwight), 1904. The System of 6th ed. New York, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Darwin, (C.), 1846. Geological notes on South America. London, Smith, Elder and Co.Google Scholar
Dickinson, (William R.), 1962. Amer. Journ. Sci., vol. 260, p. 481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, (g. R.) and Wattles, (W.A.). Geological investigations of the Yahgan Formation (upper 3Iesozoic) and associated igneous rocks of Navarino Island. (In preparation.)Google Scholar
Kranck, (E.H.), 1932. Acta Geographica, Hemnki, vol. 4, no. 2.Google Scholar
Matthews, (D.H.), 1959. Geol. Nag., vol. 96, p. 425.Google Scholar
Nockolds, (S.R.), 1954. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., vol. 65, p. 1007.Google Scholar
Reed, (J.J.), 1957. N.Z. Geol. Surv. Bull. no. 57 (new series).Google Scholar
Trendall, (A.F.), 1953. Falkland Is. Depend. Surv. Sci. Rept. no. 7. 1959. Ibid., no. 19.Google Scholar
Tyrrell, (G.W.), 1930. Rept. Geol. Coll. ‘Quest’ Exped. 1921-22. Brit. Mus. (N.H.), p. 2.Google Scholar
Wilckens, (Otto), 1933. Geol. Rundschau, vol. 24, p. 320.Google Scholar