Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:54:54.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Petrology of the Scourie dyke, Sutherland (Plate XVIII)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

M. J. O'Hara
M. J. O'Hara*
Affiliation:
Grant Institute of Geology, Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Chemical data are given for four rocks from the Scourie dyke, Sutherland, and for the constituent minerals. Three of the specimens are unsheared and represent stages in a continuous variation from a one-pyroxene (subcalcic ferroaugite) dolerits through partially amphibolized two-pyroxene dolerite to garnet-plagioclase amphibolite. These changes are not accompanied by conspicuous changes in bulk composition. The garnetiferous varieties represent a border facies of the dyke, which is in contact with little-altered pyroxene-bearing gneisses of the Lewisian complex. The fourth specimen is a hornblende schist formed from the dolerite by shearing. This change also involves little change in bulk composition, and affects impartially the three types of dolerite referred to above. Mineral relations are discussed and a hypothesis advanced to account for the garnetiferous border facies of the intrusion, invoking intrusion while the country rock was at relatively high temperature and pressure.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 32 , Issue 254 , September 1961 , pp. 848 - 865
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, (E. B.), 1951. Geol. Mag., vol. 88, p. 153.Google Scholar
Bown, (M. G.) and Gay, (P.), 1959. Amer. Min., vol. 44, p. 592.Google Scholar
Brown, (G. M.), 1957. Min. Mag., vol. 31, p. 511.Google Scholar
Buddington, (A. F.), 1952. Amer. Journ. Sci., Bowen vol., p. 37.Google Scholar
Clough, (C. T.), Teall, (J. J. H.), et al. 1907. Mem. Geol. Surv. Scotland. North-West Highlands.Google Scholar
Hess, (H. H.), 1941. Amer. Min., vol. 26, p. 515.Google Scholar
Hess, (H. H.) 1949. Amer. Min., vol. 34, p. 621.Google Scholar
Howie, (R. A.), 1955. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, vol. 62, pt.3, p. 725.Google Scholar
Macgregor, (A. G.), 1931. Min. Mag., vol. 22, p. 524.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, (W. S.) and Smith, (J. V.), 1955. Amer. Min., vol. 40, p. 707.Google Scholar
Muir, (I. D.), 1954. Min. Mag., vol. 30, p. 376.Google Scholar
Noe-Nygaard, (A.), 1948. 18th Int. Geol. Congress, London. Titles and abstracts, p. 100.Google Scholar
Poldervaart, (A.) and Gilkey, (A. K.), 1953. Amer. Min., vol. 39, p. 75.Google Scholar
Sutton, (J.) and Watson, (J.), 1951a. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. 106, p. 24.Google Scholar
Sutton, (J.) 1951b. Geol. Mag., vol. 88, p. 25.Google Scholar
Teall, (J. J. H.), 1885. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. 41, p. 132.Google Scholar
Teall, (J. J. H.) 1918. Proc. Geol. Assoc., vol. 29, p. 1.Google Scholar
Tilley, (C. E.). 1938. Geol. Mag., vol. 75, p. 497.Google Scholar
Tröger, (W. E.), 1956. Optische Bestimmung der gesteinsbildenden Minerale. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Turner, (F. J.), 1947. Amer. Min., vol. 32, p. 389.Google Scholar
Tuttle, (O. F.), 1952. Amer. Journ. Sci., Bowen vol., p. 553.Google Scholar
Wiseman, (J. D. H.), 1934. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. 90, p. 354.Google Scholar