Osbornite, meteoritic titanium nitride
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 March 2018
Extract
Nevil Story-Maskelyne described in 1870 the mineral constituents of the Bustee meteorite, which was observed to fall in 1852 near Bustee about 45 miles west of Goruckpur, India. The stone, weighing 1429 grams, now preserved in the British Museum collections, was found to consist chiefly of enstatite and diopside, and two constituents proved to be new minerals. Pale, chestnut-brown spherules of calcium sulphide, CaS, Story-Maskelyne named oldhamite and golden-yellow octahedra found embedded chiefly in the oldhamite he named osbornite. One side of the meteorite has been ground to reveal the nodules of oldhamite and a coloured lithograph in W. Flight's book ‘A chapter in the history of meteorites’ reproduces the appearance of the chief mineral constituents very well. The minute octahedra of osbornite are easily visible with a lens in the meteorite itself.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 26 , Issue 173 , June 1941 , pp. 36 - 44
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1941
References
page 36 note 1 Story-Maskelyne, N., Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, 1870, vol. 160, p. 189; Proc. Roy. Soc. London, 1870, vol. 18, p. 146.Google Scholar
page 36 note 2 N. Story-Maskelyne, Rep. Brit. Assoc. Adv. Sci., 1863, for 1862 (32nd meeting, Cambridge), Trans. of Sections, p. 190. Preliminary note on the Bustee meteorite, with the first mention of the name oldhamite.
page 36 note 3 Flight, W., London, 1887, p. 118; reprinted from Geol. Mag. London, 1875, dec. 2, vol. 2, p. 408, plate facing p. 401Google Scholar
page 37 note 1 Knaggs, I. E. and Karlik, B., Tables of cubic crystal structure of elements and compounds. London, 1932, p. 50. [M.A. 5–171.]Google Scholar
page 37 note 2 Footnote on p. 120 of his book, but not in Geol. Mag. (loc. cit.).
page 38 note 1 Wöhler, F., Annalen der Chemie und Pharmacie, 1850, vol. 73, p. 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 38 note 2 Spencer, L. J., Min. Mag., 1927, vol. 21, pp. 356 and 364.Google Scholar
page 38 note 3 Wollaston, W. H., Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, 1823, p. 17.Google Scholar
page 39 note 1 Rudge, E. A. and Arnall, F., Journ. Soc. Chem. Industry, Trans., 1928, vol. 47, p. 376.Google Scholar
page 39 note 2 Goldschmidt, V. M., Nachrichten Gesell. Wiss. Göttingen, Math.-Physikal. KI., 1927, p. 390.Google Scholar
page 39 note 3 van Arkel, A. E. and de Boer, J. H., Zeits. Anorg. Chem., 1925, vol. 148, p. 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 40 note 1 Hogg, T. W., Rep. Brit. Assoc. Adv. Sci., 1894, for 1893 (63rd meeting, Nottingham), p. 721.Google Scholar
page 40 note 2 Hofmann, W. and Schrader, A., Archiv für das Eisenhüttenwesen, 1936, vol. 10, p. 65. (See table II for their X-ray data.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 40 note 3 Stead, J. E., Journ. Iron and Steel Inst. London, 1918, vol. 97, p. 171. Min. Mag. 1919, vol. 18, p. 376. [M.A. 1–231.]Google Scholar
page 42 note 1 Oftedal, I., Zeits. Physikal. Chem., 1927, vol. 128, p. 154.Google Scholar
page 42 note 2 von Hevesy, G., Journ. Chem. Soc. London, 1931, p. 1. [M.A. 4–514.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 43 note 1 Friederich, E., Zeits. Physik, 1925, vol. 31, p. 813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 43 note 2 Ruff, O., Zeits. Anorg. Chem., 1913, vol. 82, p. 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 43 note 3 Bernal, J. D., Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. A., 1926, vol. 113, p. 117. [M.A. 3–333.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39
- Cited by