Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:03:00.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On larnite (calcium orthosilicate, a new mineral) and its associated minerals from the limestone contact-zone of Scawt Hill, Co. Antrim

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

C. E. Tilley
C. E. Tilley*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The contact-zone of Chalk and Tertiary dolerite at Scawt Hill, near Larne, Co. Antrim, consists of an assemblage of comparatively rare minerals, including a mineral of the composition Ca2SiO4 not previously recognized as a naturally occurring compound. In the assemblages of the contact-zone the chief minerals, apart from calcite, are spurrite, calcium orthosilieate (larnite), melilite (gehlenite), merwinite, spinel, perovskite, and wollastonite. Outside this contact-zone, the chalk consists almost wholly of calcium carbonate ; nearer the contact it is recrystallized to a granular mosaic of calcite of coarse texture, while at the immediate contact the chalk is completely transformed into an aggregate of new-formed silicates in varying proportions. A hybrid zone between the dolerite and the exogenous contact-rock is composed Of a coarsely crystalline rock built up essentially of titanaugite, melilite (humboldtilite), nepheline, wollastonite, perovskite, and various zeolites. An account of the melilite of this hybrid zone has already been given.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 22 , Issue 125 , June 1929 , pp. 77 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1929

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 77 note 1 Tilley, C. E., Geol. Mag., 1929, vol. 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 78 note 1 Tilley, C. E., Min. Mag., 1928, vol. 21, p. xlviii, 1929, vol. 22, p. xxviiiGoogle Scholar; and Geol. Mag., 1927, vol. 64, p. 285.

page 78 note 2 Gough, G. C., Geol. Mag., 1907, dec. 5, vol. 4, p. 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 78 note 3 Wright, F. E., Amer. Journ. Sei., 1908, ser. 4, vol. 26, p. 547.Google Scholar

page 79 note 1 Tilley, C. E., Geol. Mag., 1928, vol. 65, p. 372 Google Scholar. [Min. Abstr., vol. 4, p. 84.]

page 79 note 2 Foshag, W. F., Amer. Min., 1920, vol. 5, p. 80 Google Scholar; E. S. Larsen and W. F. Foshag, ibid., 1921, vol. 6, p. 143.

page 79 note 3 The Tasmanian mineral recorded as calcium orthosilicate by F. P. Paul (Tschermaks Min. Petr. Mitt., 1906, vol. 25, p. 309), and named shannonite (C. E. Tilley, Geol. Mag., 1927, vol. 64, p. 144) on the basis of Paul’s data, has since been shown to be monticellite (C. E. Tilley, Geol. Mag., 1928, vol. 65, p. 29). Rather than transfer the name ‘shannonite’ to the mineral now described, any further confusion will be avoided by adopting a new name. [See Min. Mag., 1928, vol. 21, p. 576.]

page 81 note 1 Day, A. L, Shepherd, E. S., and Wright, F. E., Amer. Journ. Sci., 1906, ser. 4, vol. 22, p. 294.Google Scholar

page 81 note 2 Rankin, G. A. and Wright, F. E., Amer. Journ. Sci., 1915, ser. 4, vol. 39, p. 7.Google Scholar

page 84 note 1 Larsen, E. S. and Foshag, W. F., Amer. Min., 1921, vol. 6, p. 143.Google Scholar

page 85 note 1 Wright, F. E., Amer. Journ. Sci., 1908, ser. 4, vol. 26, p. 551.Google Scholar

page 85 note 2 Eitel, W., Neues Jahrb. Min., 1923, vol. 48, p. 63.Google Scholar