Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T14:55:33.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The mineralogy of the antimony oxides and antimonates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Brian Mason  and
Charles J. Vitalian
Brian Mason
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, U.S.A.
Charles J. Vitalian
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During an investigation of stibiconite and cervantite (Vitaliano and Mason, 1952) we examined many specimens of antimony ochre. The commonest mineral in these specimens proved to be stibiconite, but others were found, and to establish their identity it became necessary to study the secondary products as a group. The mineralogy of these oxygenated secondary antimony minerals presents unusual problems on account of their earthy and often inhomogeneous nature. Our experience indicates that without X-ray powder photographs it is difficult to establish the true identity of much of this material. The purpose of this paper is to present the results of our investigations and to provide more adequate descriptions of some little-known species.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 30 , Issue 221 , June 1953 , pp. 100 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arents, (A.), 1867. Partzite, a new mineral. Amer. Journ. Sci., ser. 2, vol. 43, p. 362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, (W. P.), 1867. Note upon ‘partzite'. Amer. Journ. Sci., ser. 2, vol. 44, p. 119.Google Scholar
Bloom, (M. C.), 1939. The mechanism of the genesis of polymorphous forms. Amer. Min., vol. 24, pp. 281–292. [M.A. 7-480.]Google Scholar
Hussak, (E.) and Prior, (G. T.), 1897. On tripuhyite, a new antimonate of iron, from Tripuhy, Brazil. Min. Mag., vol. 11, pp. 302–303.Google Scholar
Igelström, (L. J.), 1865. Nya och sällsynta mineralier från Värmland. Öfversigt K. Svenska Vet.-Akad. Förh., vol. 22, pp. 227–229.Google Scholar
Lacroix, (A.), 1910. Minéralogie de la France et de ses colonies. Paris, vol. 4, p. 509.Google Scholar
Larsen, (E. S.), 1921. The microscopic determination of the nonopaque minerals Bull. U.S. Geol. Surv., no. 679, p. 145. [M.A. 1-367.]Google Scholar
Machatschki, (F.), 1932. Die Pyrochlor-Romeite-Gruppe. Chem. Erde, vol. 7, pp. 55–76. [M.A. 5-185.]Google Scholar
Mason, (B.), 1944. The determination of the density of solids. Geol. För. Förh., Stockholm, vol. 66, pp. 27–51. [M.A. 10475.]Google Scholar
Mason, (B.) and Vitaliano, (C. J.), 1952. Bystromite [sic], magnesium antimonate, a new mineral. Amer. Min., vol. 37, pp. 53–57. [M.A. l1-516.]Google Scholar
Raimoindi, (A.), 1878. Minéraux du Pérou, Paris, pp. 88, 167.Google Scholar
Ransome, (A. L.), 1940. General geology and ores of the Blind Spring Hill mining district, Mono County, California. Calif. Journ. Mines Geol., vol. 36, pp. 159– 197.Google Scholar
Riotte, (E. N.), 1867. Stetefeldtit, ein neues Mineral yon Nevada. Berg- und hüttenmänn. Zeitung, vol. 26, p. 253.Google Scholar
Vitaliano, (C. J.) and Mason, (B.), 1952. Stibiconite and eervantite. Amer. Min., vol 37, pp. 982–999. [M.A. 12-121.]Google Scholar