Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-26T21:00:54.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The mechanism of oxidation in titanomagnetites: a magnetic study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

W. O'Reilly  and
Subir K. Banerjee
W. O'Reilly
Affiliation:
School of Physics, The University, Newcastle upon Tyne, 1
Subir K. Banerjee
Affiliation:
School of Physics, The University, Newcastle upon Tyne, 1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A hypothesis for the mechanism of oxidation in titanomagnetites is first put forward on the basis of new oxidation data for pure magnetite and the new model for cation distribution in titanomagnetites. Contrary to previous claims by other workers, it is shown that single-phase spinel oxidation products of titanomagnetites can only be produced under very exacting circumstances. Lowtemperature magnetic measurements on such synthetic, oxidized materials were made to show the formation of magnetite by the decomposition of the metastable oxidation products of titanomagnetites on prolonged heating at moderate (∼ 390° C) temperatures. This magnetic method of detection is more sensitive than that of normal X-ray diffraction. It is concluded that previous claims of an increase in magnetization due to the formation of synthetic single-phase, highly oxidized titanomagnetites must be due to the formation of undetected magnetite.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 36 , Issue 277 , March 1967 , pp. 29 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akimoto, (S.) and Katsura, (T.), 1959. Journ. Geomagn. Geoelectr., vol. 10, p. 69.Google Scholar
Akimoto, (S.) and Katsura, (T.), and Yoshida, (M.), 1957. Ibid., vol. 9, p. 165.Google Scholar
Banerjee, (S. K.) and O'Reilly, (W.), 1966. Proc. Inst. Electr. Electronic Eng. (in the press).Google Scholar
Barth, (T. F. W.) and Posnjak, (E.), 1932. Zeitschr. Krist., vol. 82, p. 325.[M.A. 5-179].Google Scholar
Colombo, (U.), Fagherazzi, (G.), Gazzarini, (F.), Lanzavecchia, (G.), and Sironi, (G.), 1964. Nature, vol. 202, p. 175.[M.A. 17-162].Google Scholar
Elder, (T.), 1965. Journ. Appl. Phys., vol. 36, p. 1012.Google Scholar
Gorter, (E. W.), 1954. Philips Res. Repts., vol. 9, p. 295.Google Scholar
Goodenough, (J. B.) and Loeb, (A. L.), 1955. Phys. Rev., vol. 98, p. 391.Google Scholar
Havard, (A. D.), 1964. Ph.D. Thesis, London.Google Scholar
Lindner, (R.) and Akerstrom, (A.), 1956. Zeits. physikal. Chem., vol. 6, p. 162.Google Scholar
Nagata, (T.), Kobayasri, (K.), and Fuller, (M. D.), 1964. Journ. Geophys. Res., vol. 69, p. 2111.Google Scholar
Néel, (L.), 1948. Ann. Physique, vol. 3, p. 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Reilly, (W.) and Banerjee, (S. K.), 1965. Physics Letters, vol. 17, p. 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar