Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T10:33:40.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The kyanite isograd in Glen Clova, Angus, Scotland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

G. A. Chinner
G. A. Chinner*
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy and Petrology, Cambridge University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Mineral data from Glen Clova, Angus, suggest that the development of kyanite in graphite-bearing staurolite mica-schists, treated in terms of a Ca-free system, involved decrease of staurolite and a decrease in biotite MgO:FeO ratio. A kyanite isograd may be defined in Glen Clova as the locality where kyanite joins the assemblage staurolite-garnet-biotite-muscovite-plagioclase-quartz-graphite, the biotite having mol. , although the persistence of this identical assemblage over some 600 metres introduces some uncertainty of interpretation. It is suggested that the reaction staurolite+quartz → garnet+kyanite is unlikely to be a common reaction in nature and that its use to subdivide the amphibolite facies is unjustified.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 34 , Issue 268 , 1965 , pp. 132 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowen, (N.L.) and Schairer, (J.F.), 1935. Amer. J. Sci. vol. 29, p. 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinner, (G.A.), 1960. J. Petr., vol. l, p. 178.Google Scholar
Chinner, (G.A.), 1961. Proc. Geol. Soc. London, 1594, p. 15.Google Scholar
Deer, (W.A.), Howie, (R.A.), and Zussman, (J.), 1962. Rock-forming minerals, vol. 1. Longmans, London.Google Scholar
Francis, (G.H.), 1956. Geol. Mag, vol. 93, p. 353.Google Scholar
Fyfe, (W.S.), Turner, (F.J.), and Verhoogen, (J.), 1958. Mere. Geol. Soc. Amer. 73.Google Scholar
Harry, (W.T.), 1958. Trans. Roy Soc. Edinburgh, vol. 63, p. 393.Google Scholar
Hietanen, (A.), 1941. Geol. Soc. Amer., Special Paper 35.Google Scholar
Hietanen, (A.), 1961. Comp. Rend. Soc. geol. Finlande, No. 33.Google Scholar
Hurst, (V.J.), 1957. Geol. Surv. Georgia Bull., No. 68.Google Scholar
Juurinen, (A.), 1956. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fennicae ser. A, iii (Geol. Geog.), No. 47.Google Scholar
Niggli, (E.), 1960. Int. Geol. Cong. Rept. 21st Session Part Xiii, p. 132.Google Scholar
Phinney, (W.C.), 1963. J. Petr., vol. 4, p. 90.Google Scholar
Snelling, (N.J.), 1957. Geol. Mag., vol. 94, p. 297.Google Scholar
Thompson, (J.B.), 1957. Amer. Min., vol. 42, p. 842.Google Scholar
Tilley, (C.E.), 1924. Geol. Mag., vol. 61, p. 167.Google Scholar
Wyllie, (P.J.), 1962. Min. Mag., vol. 33, p. 9.Google Scholar
Zen, (E-An), 1961. Amer. Min., vol. 46, p. 52.Google Scholar