The identity of mottramite and psittacinite with cupriferous descloizite
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 March 2018
Extract
Mr. Arthur Russell collected in 1930 on Pim Hill, near the village of Harmer Hill, 6 miles north of Shrewsbury, Shropshire, specimens of Triassic sandstone encrusted with minute black crystals. They resemble very closely the material from Mottram St. Andrew, Cheshire, which was described and named mottramitc by Sir Henry E. Roscoe in 1876.1 Mr. Russell pointed out this resemblance and kindly placed his specimens of this rare British mineral at our disposal for investigation.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 23 , Issue 141 , June 1933 , pp. 376 - 386
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1933
References
page 376 note 1 Roscoe, H. E., Proc. Roy. Soc. London, 1876, vol. 25, p. 111.Google Scholar
page 377 note 1 Bergemann, C., Ann. Phys. Chem. (Poggendorff), 1850, vol. 80, p. 393 Google Scholar
page 377 note 2 Brush, G. J., Amer. Journ. Sci., 1857, set. 2, vol. 24, p. 116.Google Scholar
page 377 note 3 Pisani, F., Bull. Soc. Franç. Min., 1889, vol. 12, p. 40.Google Scholar
page 377 note 4 Von Kobell, F., Journ. Prakt. Chem. (Erdmann), 1850, vol. 50, p. 496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 377 note 5 Bergemann, C., Neues Jahrb. Min., 1857, p. 397.Google Scholar
page 377 note 6 Genth, F. A., Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc., 1876, vol. 14 (for 1874-75), p. 229.Google Scholar
page 377 note 7 Genth, F. A., Amer. Journ. Sci., 1876, ser. 3, vol 12, p. 35.Google Scholar
page 377 note 8 Wells, R. C., Amer. Journ. Sci., 1913, ser. 4, vol. 36, p. 636 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 377 note 9 Taber, S. and Schaller, W. T., Amer. Min., 1930, vol. 15, p. 578. [M.A. 5-46.]Google Scholar
page 377 note 10 Davies, T., Min. Mag., 1877, vol. 1, p. 112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 377 note 1 Frenzel, A., Neues Jahrb. Min., 1875, p. 673.Google Scholar
page 378 note 2 Domeyko, I., Annales des Mines, Paris, 1848, ser. 4, vol. 14, p. 145 Google Scholar
page 378 note 3 Fischer, H. and Nessler, Ber. Verh. nat. Gesell. Freiburg, 1854, vol. 1, p. 33.Google Scholar
page 378 note 4 Lang, I., Mitt. Badischen Geol. Landesanstalt, Heidelberg, 1903, vol. 4, p. 51 Google Scholar
page 378 note 5 Genth, F. A. and vom Rath, G., Zeite. Kryst. Min., 1885, vol 10, p. 464.Google Scholar
page 378 note 6 Diefenbach, A., Zeits. Krist., 1930, vol. 74, p. 178. [M.A. 4-382.JGoogle Scholar
page 382 note 1 Pufatd, Centralh]att Min., 1920, p. 289. [M.A. 1-150.]
page 382 note 2 A. Diefenbach, loc. cit., p. 155. [M.A. 4-382.]
page 382 note 3 Hillebrand, W.F., Bull. U.S. Geol. Survey, 1890, no. 60, p. 130.Google Scholar
page 382 note 4 I. Lang, Mitt. Badischen Geol. Landesanstalt, Heidelberg, 1903, vol. 4, p. 504.
page 383 note 1 E. Dittler and H. Hueber, Min. Petr. Mitt. (Tschermak), 1931, vol. 41, p. 173. [M.A. 4-525.]
page 383 note 2 Wells, R. C., Amer. Journ. Sci., 1913, ser. 4, vol. 36, p. 637.Google Scholar
page 384 note 1 C. Rammelsberg, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, 1883, part 2, p. 1215.
page 384 note 2 Kenngott, A., Mohs'sche Mineralsystem, Wien, 1853, p. 28.Google Scholar
page 385 note 1 See for example W. F. Hillebrand and G. E. F. Lundell, Applied inorganic analyses, New York, 1929, pp. 352-363. The present method as a whole is, so far as I am aware, new, but is based on the statements and suggestions made in Dr. Hillehrand's admirable account
page 386 note 1 E. Dittler and H. Hueber, Zeite. Anorg. Chem., 1930, vol. 195, p. 41 ; 1931, voh 199, p. 17. [M.A. 5-141.]
page 386 note 2 See Kunz, P., Ber. Deut. Chem. Gesell., 1894, vol. 27, part 2, p. 2561 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3
- Cited by