Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:24:07.685Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Connellite, buttgenbachite, and tallingite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

F. A. Bannister
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, British Museum (Natural History)
Max H. Hey
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, British Museum (Natural History)
G. F. Claringbull
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, British Museum (Natural History)

Extract

There are many basic copper chlorides and sulphates which occur as minerals but have received little recent crystallographic study. Yet copper is a widely distributed element and many of these minerals are the products of corrosion and weathering of bopper and copper ores.

In 1948 we were able to confirm the earlier goniometric work of G. F. Herbert Smith (1906) that paratacamite and atacamite are not identical species (Max H. Hey, 1950) and showed that the two minerals give different X-ray powder patterns. This result was further extended by Clifford Frondel (1950) to a single 'crystal and thermal study of paratacamite, in the course of which he measured the rhombohedral unit-cell dimensions and showed that this mineral can be artificially produced by various methods as well as by the action of salt-water on copper.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1802. Rashlmoh, P., British Minerals, vol. 2, London, 1802. p. 13, and pl. 12, figs. 1 and 6.Google Scholar
1847. Connell, A., Edinburgh New Phil. Journ., vol. 43, p. 243; abstracts in Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. 2, p. 146, and in Rept. Brit. Assn. for 1847. part 2, p. 49.Google Scholar
1850. Dana, J.D., Syst. Min., 3rd edu., p. 523. (Connellite.)Google Scholar
1863. Story, N. Phil. Mag., ser. 4, vol. 25, p. 39.Google Scholar
1865. Church, A.H., Journ. Chem. Soc., vol. 18, pp. 77 and 212. (Tallingite.)Google Scholar
1881. Bertrand, E., Bull. Soc. Min. France, vol. 4, p. 88.Google Scholar
1885. Summons, W., Min. Mag., vol. 6, p. 160.Google Scholar
1885. Miers, H.A., Min. Mag., vol. 6, p. 167.Google Scholar
1885. Trechmann, C.O., Min. Mag., vol. 6, p. 171.Google Scholar
1889. Prior, G.T., Min. Mag., vol. 8, p. 182.Google Scholar
1891. Koenio, G.A., Proc. Acad. Philadelphia, p. 289. (Footeite.)Google Scholar
1891. Penfield, S.L., Zeits. Kryst. Min., vol. 18, p. 507.Google Scholar
1894. Miers, H.A., Min. Mag., vol. 10, p. 275.Google Scholar
1906. Smith, G. F. H., Min. Mag., vol. 14, p. 170. (Paratacamite.)Google Scholar
1909. Palache, C. and Merwin, H.E., Amer. Journ. Sci., ser. 4, vol. 28, p. 537.Google Scholar
1915. For, W.E.. and Bradley, W.M., Amer. Journ. Sci., ser. 4, vol. 39, p. 670. [M.A. 1-263.]Google Scholar
1922. Holden, E.F., Amer. Min., vol. 7, p. 80. [M.A. 2-10.] (Ceruleofibrite.)Google Scholar
1924. Holden, E.F., Amer. Min., vol. 9, p. 55. [M.A. 2-344.]Google Scholar
1925. Schoep, A., Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris, vol. 181, p. 421. [M.A. 8-6]; and Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg., vol. 34, p. 313. [M.A. 3-372.] (Buttgenbachite.)Google Scholar
1926. Buttoenbach, H., Ann. Soc. Geol. Belg., vol. 50, Bull. p. B 35. [M.A. 3-270.]Google Scholar
1927. Schoep, A., Ann. Soc. Geol. Belg., vol. 49, Bull. p. B 308. [M.A. 3-372.]; vol. 50, Bull. p. B 215. [M.A. 3-372.]Google Scholar
1950. Frondel, C.F., Min. Mag., vol. 29, p. 34.Google Scholar
1950. Hey, M.H., An index of mineral species and varieties, arranged chemically with a list of accepted mineral names and synonyms, London, 1950. pp. 81, 264.Google Scholar