Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T05:44:32.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stability of Al2SiO5 solid solutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

R. G. J. Strens
R. G. J. Strens*
Affiliation:
School of Physics, The University, Newcastle upon Tyne 1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

An ideal solution model has been used to calculate the effect of the substitutions on the stability fields of the Al2SiO5 minerals. The results show that divariant assemblages of andalusite+sillimanite and sillimanite + kyanite solid solutions can coexist over ranges of 0·1 to 0·4 kbar at 527° C, but that kyanite+andalusite would be stable over a much narrower range. On adding (Fe, Mn)3+ to the system, the andalusite/sillimanite curve can be considered to rotate about the invariant point, first eliminating the sillimanite field, and then penetrating the kyanite field. Wide zones of viridine+sillimanite and viridine+kyanite are thus formed.

In view of the ease with which epitaxial nucleation occurs in the Al2SiO5 system, it is considered that extensive metastable growth of andalusite, sillimanite, and kyanite is improbable in nature. Metastable persistence is likely to occur in dry systems, or in the presence of an ‘armour’ of the stable phase, but reaction of millimetre-sized crystals should be completed in geologically short times when aqueous or silicate liquids are present. The combination of the effects of metastable persistence and solid solution seems adequate to account for essentially all the examples of kyanite + sillimanite and kyanite + andalusite, and for many sillimanite +andalusite assemblages. In addition, if small supersaturations develop during metamorphism, simultaneous growth of andalusite + sillimanite could occur over a restricted temperature range.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 36 , Issue 282 , June 1968 , pp. 839 - 849
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, (P. M.), 1963. Science, vol. 139, p. 1055.Google Scholar
Burns, (R. G.) and Strens, (R. G. J.), 1967. Min. Mag., vol. 36, p. 204.Google Scholar
Chinner, (G. A.), 1961. Journ. Petrology, vol. 2, p. 312.Google Scholar
Chinner, (G. A.), Knowles, (C. R.), and Smith, (J. V.), 1968.Google Scholar
Deer, (W. A.), Howie, (R. A.), and Zussman, (J.), 1962. Rock-forming minerals. Longmans, Green, London.Google Scholar
Fyfe, (W. S.), 1967. Chem. Geol., vol. 2, p. 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fyfe, (W. S.), Turner, (F. J.), and Verhoogen, (J.), 1958. Geol. Soc. Amer., Memoir 73.Google Scholar
Heinrich, (E. W.) and Corey, (A. F.), 1959. Amer. Min., vol. 44, p. 1261.Google Scholar
Hertz, (N.) and Dutra, (C. V.), 1964. Ibid., vol. 49, p. 1290.Google Scholar
Holuj, (F. J.), Thyer, (J. R.), and Hedgecock, (N. E.), 1966. Canad. Journ. Phys., vol. 44, p. 509.Google Scholar
Kuznetsov, (V. A.) 1966. Soviet Physics: Crystallography, vol. 10, p. 561 (translated from 1965, vol. 10, p. 663.Google Scholar
McLean, (D.), 1965. In Pitcher and Flinn, 1965.Google Scholar
McKie, (D.) and McConnell, (J. D. C.), 1963. Min. Mag., vol. 33, p. 581.Google Scholar
Matsushima, (S.), Kennedy, (G. C.), Ackella, (J.), and Haygarth, (J.), 1967. Amer. Journ. Sci., vol. 265, p. 28.Google Scholar
Newton, (R. C.), 1966a. Science, vol. 151, p. 1222.Google Scholar
Newton, (R. C.), 1966b. Ibid., vol. 153, p. 170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pankratz, (L. B.) and Kelley, (K. K.), 1963. U.S. Bureau of Mines, Report of Investigations 6287.Google Scholar
Pitcher, (W. S.) and Flinn, (G.), 1965. Controls of metamorphism. Oliver and Boyd, London.Google Scholar
Richardson, (S. W.), Bell, (P. M.), and Gilbert, (M. C.), 1967. Annual Rept. Director of Geophysical Lab., 1965-66, p. 247.Google Scholar
[Shabynin, (L. I.)] 1948. (Mém. Soc. Russe Min.), vol. 77, p. 203.Google Scholar
Skinner, (B. J.), Clark, (S. P.), and Appleman, (D. E.), 1961. Amer. Journ. Sci., vol. 259, p. 651.Google Scholar
Strens, (H. G. J.), 1965. Min. Mag., vol. 35, p. 547.Google Scholar
Strens, (H. G. J.), 1966a. Ibid., vol. 35, p. 777.Google Scholar
Strens, (H. G. J.), 1966b. Ibid., vol. 35, p. 928.Google Scholar
Troup, (G. J.) and Hutton, (D. R.), 1964. Brit. Journ. Appl. Phys., vol. 15, p. 1493.Google Scholar
Weill, (D. F.), 1963. Amer. Min., vol. 48, p. 944.Google Scholar
Weill, (D. F.) and Fyfe, (W. S.), 1961. Ibid. , vol. 46, p. 1191.Google Scholar
Weill, (D. F.) and Fyfe, (W. S.), 1964. Geochimica Acta, vol. 28, p. 1243.Google Scholar
Weill, (D. F.), 1966. Ibid. , vol. 30, p. 222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar