Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:58:38.638Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some zoned skarns from granite-marble contacts near Puyvalador, in the Quérigut area, eastern Pyrenees, and their petrogenesis (With Plate XIX.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

W.A. Watters
W.A. Watters*
Affiliation:
Geological Survey Office, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Descriptions, with chemicaland mineralogical data, are given of zoned wollastonite-grossular-clinozoisite skarns found at the contact of limestone and granite at Puyvalador, near Quérigut, France. It is shown that the silica and alumina necessary for the formation of the skarn were supplied by the adjacent granite, which in return received lime from the marble replaced by the skarn zones. The modified facies of the granite in contact with the skarn is also described; it shows evidence of migration of silica towards the contact and of accumulation of lime derived from the neighbouring marble.

Similar, but not identical, changes are found at other localities along the Quérigut granite contact with limestone. The features of the Puyvalador granite-limestone contacts are compared and contrasted with those described from some other regions. The contact rocks dealt with here are characterized by the presence of abundant clinozoisite, indicative of relatively low temperatures and abundance of water at the contact in the later stages of evolution of the granite.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 31 , Issue 240 , March 1958 , pp. 703 - 725
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrard, (P.), 1948. Géologie de la France. Payor, Paris.Google Scholar
Danielsson, (Allan), 1950. Geochimica Acta, vol. 1, p. 55 [M.A. 11-208].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DE Sitter, (L. U.), 1956. Geol. en Mijnb., vol. 18, p. 87.Google Scholar
Harker, (R. I.) and Tuttle, (O. F.), 1956. Amer. Journ. Sci., vol. 254, p. 239 [M.A. 13-176].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joplin, (Germaine A.), 1935. Geol. Mag., vol. 72, p. 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacroix, (A.), 1898. Serv. Carte Géol. France, vol. 10, no. 64, p. 1.Google Scholar
Lacroix, (A.), 1900. Ibid., vol. 11, no. 71, p. 1.Google Scholar
Muir, (I. D.), 1953. Geol. Mag., vol. 90, p. 182 [M.A. 12-267].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nockolds, (S. R.), 1937. Ibid., vol. 74, p. 125.Google Scholar
Nockolds, (S. R.), 1950. Min. Mag., vol. 29, p. 27.Google Scholar
Osborne, (G. D.). 1931. Geol. Mag., vol. 68, p. 289 [M.A. 4-513].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitcher, (Wallace Spenser), 1950. Min. Mag., vol. 29, p. 126.Google Scholar
Raguin, (E.), 1938. Bull. Soc. Géol. France, ser. 5, vol. 8, p. 11.Google Scholar
Roussel, (J.), 1905. Serv. Carte Géol. France, vol. 15, p. 23.Google Scholar
Tilley, (C. E.), 1948. Geol. Mag., vol. 85, p. 213 [M.A. 10-354.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, (C. E.), 1949. Ibid. vol. 86, p. 81 [M.A. 11-395].Google Scholar
Tilley, (C. E.), 1951. Min. Mag., vol. 29, p. 621.Google Scholar
Yoder, (Hatte.W S., Jr.), 1950. Journ. Geol., Chicago, vol. 58, p. 221 [M.A. 11 197].CrossRefGoogle Scholar