Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:59:51.556Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some australite structures and their origin (With Plate XXII.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

George Baker
George Baker*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Melbourne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A number of specimens of core-like australites possess well-developed flaked equatorial zones (text-fig. 1), on which peculiar grooves and flutings are present. These markings are here referred to as ‘bubble tracks’, the term indicating their apparent mode of formation. The specimens displaying these features are round and elongate forms. The round forms vary in diameter from 34 to 41 mm., the elongate forms range in length from 30 to 75 mm., while the weights vary from 27½ to 96 grams. Australites of these sizes are of infrequent occurrence, only twenty-one having been previously recorded (9, pl. 4), (2, pl. 4), and (3, pl. 9); the illustrations of these examples show that they have comparable features, such as flaked equatorial zones and bubble tracks.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 25 , Issue 168 , March 1940 , pp. 487 - 494
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1940

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Baker, (G.) Tektites from the Sherbrook river district, east of Port Campbell, Victoria. Proc. Roy. Soc. Victoria, 1937, n. ser., vol. 49, pp. 165–177. [M.A. 7–79.]Google Scholar
2. Dunn, (E. J.) Australites. Bull. Geol. Surv. Victoria, 1912, no. 27.Google Scholar
3. Fenner, (C.) Australites, Part I. Classification of the W. H. C. Shaw collection. Trans. Roy. Soc. South Australia, 1934, vol. 58, pp. 62–79. [M.A. 6–18.]Google Scholar
4. Fenner, (C.) Australites, Part II. Numbers, forms, distribution and origin. Ibid., 1935, vol. 59, pp. 125–140. [M.A. 6–208.]Google Scholar
5. Fenner, (C.) Australites, Part III. A contribution to the problem of the origin of tektites. Ibid., 1938, vol. 62, pp. 192–216. [M.A. 7–276.]Google Scholar
6. Koomans, (C. M.) On tektites and pseudo-tektites from Dutch East Indies and Philippines. Leidsche Geol. Mededeelingen, 1938, vol. 10, pp. 63–81. [M.A. 7–275.]Google Scholar
7. Linck, (G.) Oberfläche und Herkunft der meteorischen Gläser (Tektite). Neues Jahrbuch Min., Abt. A, 1928, Beil.-Bd. 57, pp. 223–236. [M.A. 3–539.]Google Scholar
8. Merrill, (G. P.) Handbook and descriptive catalogue of the meteorite collections in the United States National Museum. Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus., 1916, no. 94. [M.A. 1–94.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Walcott, (R. H.) The occurrence of so-called obsidian bombs in Australia. Proc. Roy. Soc. Victoria, 1898, n. ser., vol. 11, pp. 23–53.Google Scholar