Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T11:17:07.454Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rotating crystal X-Ray photographs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Gilbert Greenwood
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since the original experiments of M. von Laue on the diffraction of X-rays by crystals, other and more suitable methods of research have been devised. The Bragg ionization-chamber method and the Debye-Scherrer powder method are now quite well known. The newest technique is that of the so-called 'rotating crystal', which is based essentially on some experiments of M. de Broglie. This method was first employed and developed in the Kaiser Wilhehm Institut für Faserstoffchemie in Berlin. It has recently been extended by the work of J. D. Bernal in the Royal Institution in London.

There are two methods of making this type of photograph. In both a small crystal is rotated in a beam of X-rays and the reflected beams recorded photographically, in one case on a flat plate, and in the other on a cylindrical film the axis of which coincides with the axis about which the crystal is rotated.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 21 , Issue 117 , June 1927 , pp. 258 - 271
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1927

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 258 note 1 de Broglie, M., Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris, 1913, vol. 157, pp. 924 and 1413 ; 1914, vol. 158, p. 177.Google Scholar

page 258 note 2 Bernal, J. D., Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. A, 1926, vol. 113, p. 117 Google Scholar.

page 259 note 1 Polanyi, M., Zelts. Physik, 1921, vol. 7, p. 149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Polanyi, M. and Weissenberg, K., ibid., 1922, vol. 9, p. 123; 1922, vol. 10, p. 44.Google Scholar

page 260 note 1 Bravais, A., Études cristallographiques, Paris, 1866, p. 103 Google Scholar.

page 260 note 2 Perhaps the most satisfactory proof of this fact is that given by J. D. Bernal on p. 148 of his paper.

page 261 note 1 Slavik, F., Zeits. Kryst. Min., 1902, vol. 36, p. 273.Google Scholar

page 262 note 1 Astbury, W. T. and Yardley, K., Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, Seri A, 1924, vol. 224, p. 221 Google Scholar.

page 265 note 1 Slavík, F., Zeits. Kryst. Min., 1902, vol. 36, p. 274 Google Scholar.

page 268 note 1 Vegard, L., Phil. Mag., 1917, ser. 6, vol. 33, p. 395 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. [Min. Abstr., vol. 2, p. 507.]

page 269 note 1 For example, the copper atoms and the zinc atoms in γ-brass, see Bradley, A. J. and Thewlis, J., Proc. Koy. Soc. London, Ser. A, 1926, vol. 112, p. 678.Google Scholar The aluminium atoms in ehrysoberyl are crystallographically of two types, see Bragg, W. L. and Brown, G. B., Proc. Koy. Soc. London, Ser. A, 1926, vol. 110, p. 34.Google Scholar

page 270 note 1 Groth, P., Chemische Krystallographie, 1906, vol. 1, p. 171 Google Scholar; see also S. Kreutz, Elemente der Theorie der Krystallstruktur, 1916, p. 145.

page 270 note 2 Vegard, L., Phil. Mag., 1917, ser. 6, vol. 33, p. 395.Google Scholar

page 271 note 1 Greenwood, G., Min. Mag., 1925, vol. 20, p. 393.Google Scholar