Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T14:19:26.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relation between area and volume in micrometric analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

F. Chayes
F. Chayes*
Affiliation:
The Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a recent note in this Magazine, Dr. R. B. Elliott points out that inclined contacts of grains of considerably different index may bias the result of a micrometric analysis. That there may be some bias of this sort is hardly to be doubted, though I am inclined to feel that he greatly overestimates its importance. His demonstration, however, involves a fallacy so long and widely held as to be worth refuting.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 30 , Issue 221 , June 1953 , pp. 147 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 147 note 1 Elliott, R. B., Min. Mag., 1952, vol. 29, p. 833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 147 note 2 Chayes, F., Amer. Min., 1949, vol. 34, pp. 1 and 600. [M.A. 11-277.]Google Scholar

page 149 note 1 Delesse, A., Annales des Mines, 1848, sér. 4, vol. 13, p. 379.Google Scholar

page 149 note 2 Rosiwal, A., Verhandl. Geol. Reichsanst. Wien, 1898, vol. 5-6, p. 143.Google Scholar