Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:34:48.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Properties of the Al–Fe–Mn epidotes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

R. G. J. Strens
R. G. J. Strens*
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy and Petrology, Downing Place, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Natural Al-Fe-Mn epidotes are divided into Al-Fe and Al-Fe-Mn series.

In the Al-Fe series, a, b, and c increase steadily over the range 0 to 0·9 Fe3+ per formula unit, and more slowly at higher Fe contents. Index variation diagrams show the reverse trend, with indices increasing moderately fast over the range 0 to 0·85 Fe, and faster at higher Fe contents.

In the Al-Fe-Mn series, b increases almost linearly over the range of (Fe, Mn) contents, with Mn causing a larger increase than Fe, whilst a and c increase over the range 0 to 0·9 (Fe, Mn), and then decrease. This curious behaviour is accounted for by the application of crystal field theory. The indices increase linearly over the range 0·8 to 1·5 (Fe, Mn), the optic axial angle depending on (Fe, Mn) content and the ratio Mn/(Fe, Mn).

Thermal and mechanical properties (conductivity, thermal expansion, specific heat, compressibility, and hardness), electromagnetic properties (dielectric constants, conductivity, magnetic susceptibility), and thermodynamic data (S) are also summarized, and estimates given where experimental data are not available.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 35 , Issue 275 , September 1966 , pp. 928 - 944
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[Belov, (N. V.) and Rumanova, (I. M.)] , 1954. CCCP. (Proc. Inst. Cryst. Acad. Sci. USSR), vol. 9, p. 103]; abstr, in Structure Reports for 1954, vol. 18, p. 544.Google Scholar
Bilgrami, (S. A.), 1956. Min. Mag., vol. 31, p. 236.Google Scholar
Deer, (W. A.), Howie, (R. A.), and Zussman, (J.), 1962. Rock Forming Minerals, Longmans Green (London).Google Scholar
De Rudder, (R. D.) and Beck, (C. W.), 1963. Geol. Soc. Amer. Program Abstracts, p. 42a.Google Scholar
Ernst, (W. G.), 1964. Geochimica Acta, vol. 28, p. 1631.Google Scholar
[Fesenko, (E. G.), Rumanova, (I. M.), and Belov, (N. V.)] , CCCP (Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. URSS), vol. 102, p. 275]; abstr, in Structure Reports for 1955, vol. 19, p. 464.Google Scholar
Fhancis, (G. H.), 1958. Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), Min., vol. 1, p. 123.Google Scholar
Goldschlag, (M.), 1917. Handbuch der Mineralchemie, Band 2, No. 2, p. 808.Google Scholar
Gottardi, (G.), 1954. Periodico Min., vol. 23, p. 245 (Structure Reports for 1954, vol. 18, p. 544).Google Scholar
Guild, (F. N.), 1935. Amer. Min., vol. 20, p. 679.Google Scholar
Hirowatari, (F.), 1956. Journ. Min. Soc. Japan, vol. 2, p. 331.Google Scholar
Hutton, (C. O.), 1938. Min. Mag., vol. 25, p. 119.Google Scholar
Hutton, (C. O.), 1940. Geol. Mere. no. 5, New Zealand Dept. Sci. Indust. Research.Google Scholar
Hutton, (C. O.), 1942. New Zealand Journ. Sci. Tech.Google Scholar
Ito, (T.), with Sadanaga, (R.) and Takeuchi, (Y.), 1950. X-ray studies on polymorphism, Maruzen Co., Tokyo.Google Scholar
Ito, (T.), Morimoto, (N.), and Sadanaga, (R.), 1954. Aeta Cryst., vol. 7, p. 53.Google Scholar
Johnston, (R. W.), 1949. Min. Mug., vol. 28, p. 505.Google Scholar
Kelley, (K. K.), 1960. U.S. Bureau of Mines, Bull. 584.Google Scholar
King, (E. G.) and Weller, (W. W.), 1961. U.S. Bureau of Mines, R.I. 5855.Google Scholar
Malmqvist, (D.), 1929. Bull. geol. Inst. Uppsala, vol. 22, p. 223.Google Scholar
Marmo, (V.), Neuvonen, (K. J.), and Ojanpera, (P.), 1959. Bull. Comm. géol. Finlande, vol. 184, p. ll.Google Scholar
Morton, (R. D.) and Carter, (N. L.), 1963. Norsk Geol. Tidsskr., vol. 43, p. 445.Google Scholar
Myer, (G. H.), 1965. Amer. Journ. Sei., vol. 263, p. 78.Google Scholar
Myer, (G. H.), 1965. Ibid., vol. 264, p. 364.Google Scholar
Nayak, (R. K.) and Neuvonen, (K. J.), 1963. Bull. Comm. géol. Finlande, vol. 212, p. 27.Google Scholar
Newton, (R. C.) and Kennedy, (G. C.), 1963. Journ. Geophys. Research, vol. 68, p. 2967.Google Scholar
Nohthrop, (S. A.), 1935. Amer. Min., vol. 20, p. 805.Google Scholar
Odman, (O. H.), 1950. Arsbok Sveriges Geol. Undersok., vol. 44, p. 2.Google Scholar
Orlov, (A.), 1926. [Vestn. Králov. Ceské Spol. Nauk (Mém. Soc. Roy. Sci. Boheme), no. 19]; abstr, in M.A. 3-352.Google Scholar
Otto, (H.), 1935. Tschermaks Min. Petr. Mitt., vol. 47, p. 89.Google Scholar
Seki, (Y.), 1959. Amer. Min., vol. 44, p. 720.Google Scholar
Short, (A. M.), 1933. Ibid., vol. 18, p. 493.Google Scholar
Sigamony, (A.), 1944. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., vol. 20 (section A), p. 200.Google Scholar
Strens, (R. G. J.), 1964. Min. Mug., vol. 33, p. 868.Google Scholar
Tempel, (H. G.), 1938. Chemie der Erde, vol. 11, p. 525.Google Scholar
Tsuboi, (S.), 1936. Japan. Journ. Geol. Geog., vol. 13, p. 333.Google Scholar
Ukai, (Y.), 1954. Mere. Coll. Sci. Univ. Kyoto, set. B, vol. 21, p. 163.Google Scholar
Wappler, (G.), 1965. Zeits. physikal. Chem., vol. 228, p. 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolten, (G. M.) and Chase, (A. B.), 1964. Journ. Chem. Phys., vol. 41, p. 2966.Google Scholar
Zambonini, (F.), 1920. [Boll. Com. Geol. Ital., vol. 47, p. 65]; abstr, in M.A. 2-187.Google Scholar