Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T12:17:22.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the chemistry of pillow lavas and the origin of spilites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

T. G. Vallance
T. G. Vallance*
Affiliation:
Geology Dept., University of Sydney
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Twenty-five new analyses of 10 spilitic pillows from the British Isles offer evidence of considerable variability in distribution of components, notably Si, Na, Mg.Fe2+, Ca, Fe3+, and water. Selvedges of pillows have compositions strongly contrasted with but essentially complementary to those of cores. Redistribution of components is believed to have occurred during devitrification. Geosynclinal spilites are regarded as basalts which have suffered such redistribution under conditions of diagenesis or low-grade metamorphism.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 34 , Issue 268 , 1965 , pp. 471 - 481
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, (E.B.), 1913. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. 69, p. 280.Google Scholar
Bailey, (E.B.), and Mccallien, (W.J.), 1960. Ibid., vol. 116, p. 365.Google Scholar
Balslllie, (D.), 1932. Geol. Mag., vol. 69, p. 107.Google Scholar
Battey, (M.H.), 1956. Ibid., vol. 93, p. 89.Google Scholar
Coombs, (D.S.), 1960. Rept. Intern. Geol. Congr., Xxi Sess., part 13, p. 339.Google Scholar
Flett, (J.S.), 1946. Geology of the Lizard and Meneage. Mere. Geol. Surv. U.K.Google Scholar
Gardiner, (C.I.) and Reynolds (S.H.), 1912. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. 68, p. 75.Google Scholar
Greenly, (E.), 1919. The Geology of Anglesey. Mere. Geol. Surv. U.K.Google Scholar
Iiyama, (J.T.), 1961. Bull. Soc. franç Min., vol. 84, p. 128.Google Scholar
Matley, (C.A.), 1928. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. 84, p. 440.Google Scholar
Middleton, (G.V.), 1960. Geol. Mag., vol. 97, p. 192.Google Scholar
Nicholls, (G.D.), 1959. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. 114, p. 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peach, (B.N.) et al., 1899. The Silurian Rocks of Britain, vol. 1. Mem. Geol. Surv. U.K.Google Scholar
Peach, (B.N.) 1911. Tile Geology of Knapdale, etc. Mere. Geol. Surv. U.K.Google Scholar
Peacock, (M.A.), 1930. Geol. Mag., vol. 67, p. 170.Google Scholar
Reinhard, (M.) and Wenk, (E.), 1951. Geol. Surv. Dept. Brit. Territ. in Borneo, Bull. 1.Google Scholar
Scott, (B.), 1951. Pap. Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasmania for 1950, p. 113.Google Scholar
Slavik, (F.), 1928. Intern. Geol. Congr., C.R. 14th Sess., Spain, 1926, fasc. 4, p. 1389.Google Scholar
Thomas, (G.E.) and Thomas, (T.M.), 1956. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. 112, p. 291.Google Scholar
Vallance, (T.G.), 1960. Proc. Linnean Soc. N.S.W., vol. 85, p. 8.Google Scholar
Vuagnat, (M.), 1949a. Archives d. Sci., vol. 2, p. 223.Google Scholar
Vuagnat, (M.), 1949b. Schweiz. Min. Petr. Mitt., vol. 29, p. 524.Google Scholar
Vuagnat, (M.), 1959. Archives d. Soc. Min. Italiana, anno 15, p. 311.Google Scholar
Yoder, (H.S.) and Tilleu, (C.E.), 1962. Journ. Pert., vol. 3, p. 342.Google Scholar