Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:36:15.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On maucherite (nickel-speiss, placodine, temiskamite) (With Plate XXIV.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

M. A. Peacock
M. A. Peacock*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Nickel-Speiss (Nickelspeise), an impure arsenide of nickel obtained as a by-product in the manufacture of smalt, has long been known as a source of distinct crystals representing a definite chemical compound. Such crystals were already analysed by Döbereiner (1823), who concluded that the material was an artificial form of niccolite, NiAS. Later analyses showed that the composition of the crystallized furnace product approaches Ni3As2, a compound unknown in nature at that time.

A substance corresponding to the crystallized nickel-speiss, but thought to be of natural origin, was first described by Breithaupt (1841), who named the material Plakodin (πλăκώδης, broad) in allusion to the tabular habit of the crystals. These were said to have occurred in the Jungfer mine at Müsen in Westphalia, associated with chalybite and gersdorffite and to have been salved by a smalt-works official from a shipment of ores.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 25 , Issue 169 , June 1940 , pp. 557 - 572
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1940

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berman, (H.), 1939. A torsion microbalance for the determination of specific gravities of minerals. Amer. Min., vol. 24, pp. 434–440. [M.A. 7-399.]Google Scholar
Braun, (J.), 1879. Ueber Nickelspeise (Placodin). Zeits. Kryst. Min., vol. 3, pp. 421–425.Google Scholar
Breithaupt, (A.), 1841. Plakodin, ein neuer Kies. Ann. Phys. Chem. (Poggendorff), vol. 53, pp. 631–632.Google Scholar
Döbereiner, (J. W.), 1823. Künstlich krystallisirter Kupfernickel. Ann. Phys. Chem. (Gilbert), vol. 73, pp. 226.Google Scholar
Donnay, (J. D. H.), 1938. Le développement des zones cristallines. Ann. Soc. Géol. Belgique, vol. 61, pp. B260–B287. [M.A. 7-242.]Google Scholar
Donnay, (J. D. H.) and Harker, (D.), 1937. A new law of crystal morphology extending the law of Bravais. Amer. Min., vol. 22, pp. 446–467. [M.A. 7-241.]Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, (V.), 1920. Atlas der Krystallformen, vol. 6, Heidelberg. [M.A. 2–289.]Google Scholar
Grünling, (F.), 1913. Maucherit Ni3As2, ein neues Nickelmineral aus den Kobaltrücken des Mansfelder Kupierschiefers. Centralb. Min., pp. 225–226.Google Scholar
Hintze, (C.), 1904. Handbuch der Mineralogie, vol. 1, pt. 1, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hintze, (C.), 1938. Handbuch der Mineralogie, Ergänzungsband, Neue Mineralien, Berlin and Leipzig. [M.A. 7–58.]Google Scholar
Laves, (F.), 1935. Zweidimensionale Überstrukturen. Zeits. Krist., vol. 90, pp. 279–282. [M.A. 6-165.]Google Scholar
Orcel, (J.), 1928. Notes sur les caractères mieroscopiques des minéraux opaques, principalement en lumière polarisée. Bull. Soc. Franç. Min., vol. 51, pp. 197–210. [M.A. 4-229.]Google Scholar
Palache, (C.), and Wood, (H. O.), 1904. A crystallographic study of millerite. Amer. Journ. Sci., ser. 4, vol. 18, pp. 343–359. Krystallographische Untersuchung des Millerit. Zeits. Kryst. Min., 1905, vol. 41, pp. 1-18.Google Scholar
Palmer, (C.), 1914. Studies in silver enrichment. Econ. Geol., vol. 9, pp. 664–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacock, (M. A.), 1937. On normal triclinic face-symbols and the harmonic-arithmetic rule. (Abstract.) Amer. Min., vol. 22, p. 210.Google Scholar
Rosati, (A.), 1914. Über Maucherit und Placodin. Zeits. Kryst. Min., vol. 53, pp. 389–393.Google Scholar
Rose, (G.), 1833. Ueber die Krystallform der Nickelspeise. Ann. Phys. Chem. (Poggendorff), vol. 28, pp. 433–435.Google Scholar
Schneiderhöhn, (H.) and Ramdohr, (P.), 1931. Lehrbuch der Erzmikroskopie, vol. 2, Berlin. [M.A. 4-434.]Google Scholar
Short, (M. N.), 1934. Microscopic determination of the ore minerals. Bull. U. S. Geol. Surv., no. 825. (Mimeographed revision of Part 3, Determinative tables.)Google Scholar
Walker, (T. L.), 1914. Temiskamite, a new nickel arsenide from Ontario. Amer. Journ. Sci., ser. 4, vol. 37, pp. 170–172.Google Scholar