Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:51:08.766Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On a Serpentine-rock from the mass of the Tarnthaler-Köpfe, Tirol

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Extract

The rock-specimens here treated were collected in 1902 on a small plateau near the head of the Oberer-Bach, where the rock is in place. This stream, rising near the Röckner or Reckner, a summit of the Tarnthaler-Köpfe on the north of the Tuxerthaler mass, flows down a steep ravine southward to join the Schmirner-Bach: the locality is situated about 20 kilometres to the south-east of Innsbruck. The figures 2629 (height in metres) on the ‘Generalstabskarte’ probably represent the site of the plateau ; it is on the right bank of the stream, close to, and some 12 or 15 metres above, a small frozen lake near the head of the stream. The point was reached by ascending the ridge from the Kreuzjöchl. There was much snow on the plateau and the geological relations of this particular occurrence were not observed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1907

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Page 366 note 1 Hussak, E., ‘Ueber einige alpine Serpentine.’ Min. Petr. Mitt. (Tschermak), 1883, vol. v, pp. 6181 Google Scholar.

Page 366 note 2 The fact that the pinacoidal cleavage (010) of olivine is perpendicular to the optic axial plane helps to distinguish this mineral from pyroxene ; for in sections of the latter, in which the prismatic cleavage is shown as parallel cracks, the trace of the optic axial plane is parallel to-these.

Page 366 note 3 Rothpletz, A., ‘Ein geologischer Querschnitt durch die Ost-Alpen.’ Stuttgart, 1894, pp. 83, 84Google Scholar.

Page 366 note 4 von Drasche, R., ‘Ueber Serpentine und serpentinähnliche Gesteine.’ Min. Petr. Mitt. (Tschermak), 1872, Jahrg. 1871, pp. 112 Google Scholar.

Page 367 note 1 Lindemann, B., ‘Petrographische Studien in der Umgebung von Sterzing in Tirol.’ Neues Jahrb. Min, 1906, Beilage-Band xxii, pp. 454554.Google Scholar

Page 368 note 1 These forms are recognized by von Drasche (loc. cit.) to be sections respectively transverse and parallel to the cleavage of the antigorite.

Page 369 note 1 Weinschenk, E., ‘Beiträgo zur Petrographie der östlichen Centralalpen speciell des Gross-Venedigerstockes.’ Abhandl. bayer. Akad. Wiss., 1895, vol. xviii, pp. 651746 Google Scholar. (See p. 661.)

Page 369 note 2 The antigorite of the Antigorio valley diverges in optical properties still more, though in the same direction, from the mineral A, the axial angle varying from 0° to 36° (C. Klein, Sitzungsber. prouss. Akad. Wiss, 1894, p. 768.)

Tschermak gives 20° or more for the axial angle of the Spreehenstein mineral, but says (p. 255), apparently quoting Hussak, ‘die kleinste Elasticitätsaxe ist sankrecht zur Spaltobene’ —which is, perhaps, a clerical error. ( Tschermak, G., ‘Die Chloritgruppe.’ Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, math.-nat. Classe, 1890, vol. xcix, Abth. I, pp. 174267 Google Scholar.)

Page 371 note 1 A. Rothpletz, loc. cit.

Page 371 note 2 Becke, F., ‘Olivinfels und Antigorit-Serpentin aus dem Stubachthal (Hohe Tauern).’ Min. Petr. Mitt. (Tschermak), 1894, vol. xiv, pp. 271-6.Google Scholar

Page 371 note 3 E. Weinschenk, loc. cit.

Page 371 note 4 Preiswerk, H., ‘Der Serpentin am Geisspfad (Oberwallis).’ Eclogae geologicae Helvetiae, 1901, vol. vii, pp. 123-5.Google Scholar

Page 372 note 1 Suess, F. E., ‘Das Gebiet der Triasfalten im Nordosten der Brennerlinie.’ Jahrb. geol. Reichsanstalt, Wien, 1894, vol. xliv, pp. 589668 Google Scholar.

Page 372 note 2 Termier, p., ‘Les Nappes des Alpes orientales et la synthèse des Alpes.’ Bull. Soc. géol. de France, 1904, sér. 4, vol. iii, pp. 711-65Google Scholar.