Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:54:35.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Note on the van der Kolk method of determining refractive indices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

R. C. Evans
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy and Petrology, University of Cambridge
N. F. M. Henry
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy and Petrology, University of Cambridge

Extract

It is well known that in the Schroeder Van der Kolk method of comparing the refractive index of a crystal grain with that of the material in which it is mounted, the effect can be reversed by moving the microscope sub-stage condenser, and that the position of this condenser must therefore be carefully controlled if ambiguities in the interpretation of the observations are to be avoided. This fact is mentioned in the majority of text-books and is referred to in a general manner by Wright and by Winchell. No clear explanation of the reversal is offered, however, and students are consequently inclined to forget this important limitation in the method or, alternatively, to forget in which sense the movement of the condenser influences the effect: unless a control experiment is invariably performed errors may therefore result.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1942

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 267 note 1 van der Kolk, J. L. C. Schroeder, Tabellen zur mikroskopischen Bestimmung der Mineralien nach ihrem Brechungsindex. 2nd edit., Wiesbaden, 1906.Google Scholar

page 267 note 2 Wright, F. E., The methods of petrographic-microscopic research. 1911, p. 94.Google Scholar

page 267 note 3 Winchell, A. N., Elements of optical mineralogy. 5th edit., pt. 1, 1937, p. 79.Google Scholar