Note on the thirty-two classes of symmetry
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 March 2018
Extract
Considerable confusion exists with regard to the nomenclature of the thirty-two possible classes of symmetry and their classification into systems. Each class is usually denoted by a name and a symbol ; but as every author invents his own names and symbols (the latter being often merely arbitrary numbers) the whole nomenclature is hopelessly confused. This is due to the fact that a different classification into systems, and consequently a different nomenclature is suggested according as the subject is approached (1) from the geometrical aspect based on the law of rational indices alone, (2) from the aspect of the structure-theory, (3) from the aspect of the practical crystallographer. Thus, for example, Dr. A. Schoenflies finds two distinct classifications necessary according as the subject is approached from aspect (1) or (2).
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 14 , Issue 66 , February 1907 , pp. 261 - 263
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1907
References
Page 261 note 1 ‘Krystallsysteme und Krystallstructur,’ 1891, pp. 146 and 148.
Page 261 note 2 As is done by T. Liebisch in his ‘Grundriss der physikalischen Krystallographle’ (1896), though he does not point out the logical conclusion of his method.
- 1
- Cited by