Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:50:22.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The nomenclature of the halloysite minerals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Douglas M. C. MacEwan*
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts

Extract

The name ‘halloysite’, first used in 1826 by Berthier, is derived from that of Omalius d'Halloy, who found the mineral in Angleur, Liége, Belgium. In 1935, Mehmel discovered that there were two distinct substances included under the name halloysite, one of which contains loosely bound water and shows a 10 Å. basal reflection on an X-ray diagram, the other none and shows a reflection at about 7 Å. Mehmel preserved the name halloysite for the hydrous mineral, and for the product of its dehydration he proposed the name ‘metahalloysite’. Both substances may occur naturally (though this may not have been known to Mehmel at the time). Previous to this work it had been suggested by Hofmann, Endell, and Wilm that the 10 Å. material on dehydration at a low temperature gave kaolinite. Mehmel showed that this was wrong; and that the error was due to the similarity of the X-ray diagrams of kaolinite and metahalloysite. Hofmann and co-workers, and Mehmel, all tacitly assumed that the name halloysite was correctly applied to the 10 Å. material rather than the 7 Å. material.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Berthier, P., 1826. Analyse de l'halloysite. Ann. Chim. Phys., vol. 32, pp. 332335.Google Scholar
2. Mehmel, M., 1935. Über die Struktur yon Halloysit und Metahalloysit. Zeits. Krist., vol. 90, pp. 3543. [M.A. 6–181.]Google Scholar
3. Hofmann, U., Endell, K., and Wilm, D., 1934. Röntgenographisehe und kolloidchemisehe Untersuehungen über Ton. Angew. Chem., vol. 47, pp. 539547.Google Scholar
4. Hendricks, S. B., 1938. On the crystal structure of the clay minerals: dickite, halloysite and hydrated halloysite. Amer. Min., vol. 23, pp. 295301. [M.A. 7–422.]Google Scholar
5. Alexander, L. T., Faust, G. T., Hendricks, S. B., Insley, H., and McMurdie, H. F., 1943. Relationship of the clay minerals halloysite and endellite. Amer. Min., vol. 28, pp. 118. [M.A. 8–342.]Google Scholar
6. Bradley, W. F. 1945. Diagnostic criteria for clay minerals. Amer. Min., vol. 30, pp. 704713. [M.A. 10–21.]Google Scholar
7. MacEwan, D. M. C., 1946. Halloysite-organic complexes. Nature, London, vol. 157, pp. 159160. [M.A. 10–27.]Google Scholar
8. Brindley, G. W., Robinson, K., and MacEwan, D. M. C., 1946. The clay minerals halloysite and metahalloysite. Nature, London, vol. 157, pp. 225226. [M.A. 10–28.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Bradley, W. F., 1945. Molecular associations between montmorillonite and some polyfunctional organic liquids. Journ. Amer. Chem. Soc., vol. 67, pp. 975981.Google Scholar
10. Edelman, C. H. and Favejee, J. C. L., 1940. On the crystal structure of montmorillonite and halloysite. Zeits. Krist., vol. 102, pp. 417431. [M.A. 9–82.]Google Scholar
11. Grim, R. E., 1942. Modern concepts of clay minerals. Journ. Geol. Chicago, vol. 50, pp. 225275. [M.A. 8–294.]Google Scholar
12. Quoted by Brudant, F. S., 1830. Traité élémentaire de minéralogic. 2nd edit., Paris, p. 36.Google Scholar
13. Quoted by Rammelsberg, C., 1875. Handbuch der Mineralchemie. 2nd edit., p. 642.Google Scholar
14. Dufrénoy, A., 1833. Sur le gisement et la composition de quelques silicates alumineux. Ann. Mines, ser. 3, vol. 3, p. 393.Google Scholar
15. Glocker, E. F., 1837. Über den Halloyit [sic] aus Oberschlesien. Journ. prakt. Chem., vol. 12, pp. 173182.Google Scholar
16. Pisani, F., 1861. Analyse de la glossecolite [sic] Shepard. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris, vol. 52, p. 310.Google Scholar
17. Cox, E. T., 1878. Ann. Rep. Geol. Surv. Indiana, p. 154 (see also ibid., 1874, p. 15).Google Scholar
18. Helmhacker, R., 1880. Einige Mineralien aus der Gruppe der Thone. Tsch. Min. Petr. Mitth., vol. 2, pp. 237243.Google Scholar
19. Le Chatelier, H., 1887. Sur la constitution des argiles. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris, vol. 104, pp. 15171520 (also Bull. Soc. Franç. Min., vol. 10, pp. 210–212).Google Scholar
20. Blatchley, W. S., 1904. Ann. Rep. Dept. Geol. & Natural Resources, Indiana, p. 55.Google Scholar
21. Pilipenko, P. P., 1915. Bull. Imp. Univ. Tomsk, no. 63. [M.A. 2–112.]Google Scholar
22. Larsen, E. S. and Wherry, E. T., 1917. Halloysite from Colorado. Journ. Washington Acad. Sci., vol. 7, pp. 178180. [M.A. 2–133.]Google Scholar
23. Šplíchal, J., 1919. Příspěvek k poznánt koloidních jílů. Zemědělský Archiv, Praha, vol. 10, pp. 413431. [M.A. 1–288.]Google Scholar
24. Davies, G. M., 1919. The section at Worm's Heath, Surrey: Petrological examination of the deposits. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. London, vol. 75, pp. 2223.Google Scholar
25. Granger, A. and Brémont, P., 1922. Sur la composition chimique d'une roche dénommée kaolin de Djebel Debar (Algérie). Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris, vol. 175, p. 36.Google Scholar
26. Chirvinsky, P. N., 1929. Beiträge zur Mineralogie Russlands. Zeits. Krist., vol. 70, p. 274. [M.A. 4–181.]Google Scholar
27. Erdmannsdörffer, O. H., 1930. Halloysit von Elbingerode. Chem. Erde, vol. 5, pp. 9698. [M.A. 5–361.]Google Scholar
28. Rammelsberg, C., 1875. Handbuch der Mineralchemie. 2nd edit., pp. 642643.Google Scholar
29. Ross, C. S. and Kerr, P. F., 1934. Halloysite and allophane. Prof. Paper U.S. Geol. Survey, no. 185-G, pp. 135148. [M.A. 6–136.]Google Scholar
30. Brindley, G. W., 1946–7. Randomness in the structure of the kaolinite minerals. Faraday Society symposium on ‘Swelling and shrinking’ (in press).Google Scholar
31. Belyankin, D. S. and Ivanova, V. P., 1935. Drei Kaoline. Zentr. Min., Abt. A, Jahrg. 1935, pp. 298308. [M.A. 7:103.]Google Scholar