Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:41:27.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The morphology of the baryte group1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

A. F. Seager
A. F. Seager*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Birkbeck College, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The observed order of importance of the forms of baryte, anglesite, and celestine is first determined by a modification of the methods used by Donnay and Harker. Their hypothesis is applied to determine the space-groups of these minerals by morphological means, and a comparison is made of the observed and theoretical orders of importance of forms in these minerals. It is concluded that agreement is poor between the observed and predicted frequencies of forms in the baryte group. The rank distribution of some of the more important forms is presented graphically.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 32 , Issue 244 , March 1959 , pp. 63 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

‘The morphology of baryte’ forms part of a thesis approved for the degree of Ph.D. by the University of London, 1953.

References

page 63 note on 2 Donnay, J. D. H. and Harker, D., Amer. Min., 1937, vol. 22, p. 446 [M.A. 7-241]Google Scholar

page 63 note on 3 Donnay, J. D. H., Ann. Soc. géol. Belgique, 1938, vol. 61, p. B 260 [M.A. 7-242]Google Scholar

page 63 note on 4 Donnay, J. D. H. and Harker, D., Naturaliste Canadien, 1940, vol. 67, p. 33 [M.A. 84]Google Scholar.

page 63 note on 5 Donnay, J. D. H., Bull. Soc. franç. Min., 1946, vol. 69, p. 152. A bibliography of papers by Donnay and others (1937-46) on the morphology of crystals.Google Scholar

page 66 note on 1 For baryte the Atlas yielded the required data for 486 crystals with an aggregate of 3373 forms from 153 localities and the Handbuch gave 505 crystals with 3527 forms from 423 localities. For anglesite the Atlas gave 359 crystals showing 2204 forms from 63 localities and the Handbuch gave 167 crystals with i173 forms from I08 localities. For celestine the Atlas gave details of 201 crystals with 941 forms from 48 localities and the Handbuch of 159 crystals with 935 forms from 123 localities.

page 67 note on 1 James, R. W. and Wood, W. A., Proc. Roy. Soc., 1925, ser. A, vol. 109, p. 598 [M.A. a-345]CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

page 69 note on 1 Peacock, M. A., Amer. Min., 1937, vol. 22, p. 210.Google Scholar

page 69 note on 2 Donnay, J. D. H., Ann. Soc. géol. Belgique, 1938, vol. 61, p. B 266.Google Scholar

page 74 note on 1 J. D. H. Donnay and D. Harker, Naturaliste Canadien, 1940, loc. cir.

page 76 note on 1 R. W. James and W. A. Wood, loc. cir.

page 76 note on 2 F. C. Phillips, An introduction to crystallography, 1946, pp. 287-8 [M.A. 10-97].

page 76 note on 3 Donnay, J. D. H., Trans. Roy. Soc. Canada, 1940, ser. 3, sect. IV, vol. 34, p. 33 [M:.A. 8306]Google Scholar.

page 79 note on 1 Taylor, E. D., Amer. Min., 1940, vol. 25, p. 123 [M.A. 8-95]Google Scholar.

page 85 note on 1 p. Hartman. Thesis, 1953. Grolfingen [M.A. t2-314].

page 86 note on 1 Hartman, p. and Perdok, W. G., Acta Cryst., 1955, vol. 8. A paper in three parts, I, p. 49; II, p. 521; III, p. 525 [M.A. 13-279]. P. Hartman and W. G. Perdok, Amer. Min., 1956, vol. 41, p. 449 [1K.A. 13-280].Google Scholar