Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T03:41:26.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kalsilite, a polymorph of KAlSiO4, from Uganda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

F. A. Banister  and
Max H. Hey
F. A. Banister
Affiliation:
Mineral Department, British Museum
Max H. Hey
Affiliation:
Mineral Department, British Museum
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Professor Arthur Holmes has described in the preceding paper a suite of rocks from Mafuru, Uganda. During his study he observed in thin section a mineral which in optical properties is indistinguishable from nepheline. He gives chemical evidence, however, for the presumption that a potassium aluminosilicate is present in mafurite which would suggest either that the nepheline-like mineral is kaliophilite or a polymorphous form of KAlSiO4. Kaliophilite is not isomorphous with nepheline, but has similar optical properties, and the two minerals could be easily confused in thin section. They may, however, be rapidly distinguished by X-ray methods. Even minute grains insufficient for chemical analysis can be determined with certainty; so it seemed probable that an X-ray study of the nepheline-like mineral from Uganda would give additional information and decide whether or no a separation and chemical analysis of the mineral should be attempted. Professor Holmes accordingly invited me to examine his specimens and rock-sections.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 26 , Issue 177 , June 1942 , pp. 218 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1942

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 218 note 1 Bannister, F. A. and Hey, M. H., Min. Mag., 1931, vol. 22, p. 569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 220 note 1 Taylor, W. H., Darbyshire, J. A., and Strunz., H. Zeits. Krist., 1934, vol. 87, p. 464. [M.A. 6–177.]Google Scholar Chao, S. H. and Taylor, W. H., Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. A, 1940, vol. 176, p. 76. [M.A. 8–13.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar G. Friedel, Bull.

page 220 note 2 Friedel, G., Bull. Soc. Franç. Min., 1912, vol. 35, p. 471.Google Scholar

page 220 note 3 Bowen, N. L., Amer. Journ. Sci., 1917, ser. 4, vol. 43, p. 115. [M.A. 1–167.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 220 note 4 Duboin, A., Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris, 1892, vol. 115, p. 56. Bull. Soc. Franç. Min., 1892, vol. 15, p. 191.Google Scholar

page 220 note 5 Trömel, G., Veröffentlichungen aus dem Kaiser Wilhelm-Institut für Silikatforschung in Berlin-Dahlem, 1930, vol. 3, p. 103.Google Scholar Eitel, W. and Troemel, G., Fort. Min. Krist. Petr., 1929, vol. 14, p. 28. [M.A. 0–60.]Google Scholar

page 220 note 6 Thugutt, S. J., Arch. Min. Tow. Nauk. Warszaw. (Arch. Min. Soc. Sci. Varsovie), 1937, vol. 13, p. 112. [M.A. 7–146.]Google Scholar

page 221 note 1 Winchell., A. N. The microscopic characters of artificial inorganic solid substances or artificial minerals. 2nd edit., New York, 1931, p. 308. [M.A. 5–2.]Google Scholar

page 221 note 2 Gabriel, A. and Cox, E. P., Amer. Min., 1929, vol. 14, p. 290. [M.A. 4–219.]Google Scholar M. L., Keith, Amer. Min., 1939, vol. 24, p. 561. [M.A. 8–17.]Google Scholar

page 223 note 1 Pratt, J. H. and Foote., H. W. Amer. Journ. Sci., 1897, ser. 4, vol. 3, p. 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 223 note 2 Sekanina, J. and Wyart., J. Bull. Soc. Franç. Min., 1937, vol. 60, p. 139. [M.A. 7–346.]Google Scholar

page 223 note 3 Wyart, J. and Chatelain., P. Bull. Soc. Franç. Min., 1938, vov. 61, p. 121. [M.A. 7–347.]Google Scholar