Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:56:51.554Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Identity of Andorite, Sundtite and Webnerite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

G. T. Prior
Affiliation:
Assistants in the Mineral Department of the British Museum
L. J. Spencer
Affiliation:
Assistants in the Mineral Department of the British Museum

Extract

On November 14th, 1892, Prof. J. A. Krenner read before the Hungarian Academy of Sciences an account of a new silver ore from Felsöbánya, to which he gave the name of Andofite. It was described as orthorhombie with a : b : c = 0.97756 : 1 : 0.86995, and as having the chemical composition 2PbS.Ag2S.3Sb2S3.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1897

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 286 note 1 "Andorit, uj hazai ezüstércz." Mathematikai ds termgszettudomdnyi. Érteaito, XI. 119-122, 1892. German abstracts of this paper ("Andorit, ein neues ungarisches Silbererz") are given by A. schmidt in Zeits. Kryst. Min. XXIII. 497-499, 1894, and in Földtani Közlöny, XXV. 258-259, 1895.

page 286 note 2 "Sundtit, et nyt mineral fra Oruro i Bolivia." Forhandlinger i Videnskabs- Selskabet i Chriatiania, for 1892, No. 18, 1893; and Zeits. Kryst. Min. XXI. 193- 199, 1893.

page 287 note 1 "Notizen fiber Sundtit yon Oruro in Bolivia." Zeits. Kryst. Min. XXIV. 124-125, 1894.

page 287 note 2 "Bemerkungen über Zinekemte yon Oruro in Bolivia." Zeits. Kryst. Min. XXIV. 125-127, 1894.

page 289 note 1 Before the idea of tbe identity of the mineral with Sundtite and Andorite had been entertaiued, the axial ratios were deduced from the angles bn = 72°2½ and by = 37°58½, as a : b : c = 0.324 : 1 : 1.281.

page 290 note 1 This drusy material sometimes showed hexagonal outlines under the microscope, and it is possibly the same mineral as that referred to stephanite above.

page 291 note 1 =a(lO0) of Krenner.

page 292 note 1 Krenner interchanges a{100} aml b{010}; his parametral plaue would be (463), which is not an observed form.

The amount of this was too small to make a satisfactory determination of the chemical compnsition possible. PSblmann mentions antimony oxide as a yellow powder dusted over the crystals.

page 295 note 1 On this projection all the forms of Andorite, with the exception of u{130}, are Represented,

page 299 note 1 Amer. Jouru. Sci. 1894, XLVIII. p. 130.

page 299 note 2 This may possibly be jamesonite.

page 299 note 3 Dana gives ms = 46°26⅔′, and Miller 46°26′.

page 300 note 1 Petermann's Geograph. Mitth. 1867, p. 319.

page 300 note 2 Berg- und Hfittellnt. Zeit. 1887, p. 157; 1888, pp. 241 and 263.

page 300 note 3 Annales des Mznes 1894, Ser. 9, V. Mem. p. 511, with map.

page 300 note 4 Zeits. deutseh, geol. Ges. 1897, XLIX. pp. 82, 126. See also F. de Castelnnu, Expedition Amerique du Sud, 1851, III. 358.

page 300 note 5 Amer. Journ. Sei. 1896, [4] II. p. 28; and Zeits. Kryst. Min. 1896, XXVII. p. 76.