Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T09:48:42.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fülöppite, a new Hungarian mineral of the plagionite-semseyite group1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

I. de Finály  and
Sándor Koch
I. de Finály
Affiliation:
Royal Hungarian Geological Survey
Sándor Koch
Affiliation:
Hungarian National Museum, Budapest
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the Autumn of 1928 Dr. Béla Fülöpp and Mr. G. Kupás sent for examination an unknown mineral, which had been found in no. III level on the main lode of the Kereszthegy mine at Nagybánya, comitat Szatmár [now Baia Mare, Satul-Mare, Romania]. The small crystals show a close resemblance to those of plagionite from Wolfsberg in the Harz Mountains, but the results of our detailed examination prove that we have here a new mineral. For this we propose the name Fülöppite in honour of Dr. B. Fülöpp, an enthusiastic collector of minerals and a generous patron of the Magyar Nemzeti Mfizeum (Hungarian National Museum).

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 22 , Issue 127 , December 1929 , pp. 179 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1929

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Read at the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Class III (Natural History), on April 22, 1929. The mineralogical and crystallographic work was done by Dr. S. Koch in the Mineralogical-Petrographical Institute of the Pázmany Páter University, Budapest, and the chemical portion by I. de Finály in the Chemical Laboratory of the Royal Hungarian Geological Survey.

References

page 182 note 1 Treadwell, F. P., Kurzes Lehrbuch anal. Chem., 1922, vol. 2, p. 307.Google Scholar

page 182 note 2 Winkler, L. W., Zeits. angew. Chem., 1922, vol. 35, p. 662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 182 note 3 Treadwell, F. P., loc. cir., vol. 2, p. 180.Google Scholar

page 182 note 4 Treadwell, F. P., loc. cit., vol. 2, p. 306.Google Scholar

page 182 note 5 Winkler, L. W., Zeits. angew. Chem., 1917, vol. 30, p. 251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; 1920, vol. 33, pp. 59, 159.

page 183 note 1 Spencer, L. J., Min. Mag., 1899, vol. 12, p. 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 183 note 2 The analysis is actually between 3PbS.4Sb2S3 and 2PbS.3Sb2S3., as may be seen from the calculated values for the formula given below.

page 183 note 3 Axial ratios of Zambonini, F., Rivista Min. Crist. Ital., 1912, vol. 41, p. 21.Google Scholar

page 183 note 4 Axial ratios of Smith, G. F. H., Min. Mag., 1919, vol. 18, p. 357.Google Scholar

page 184 note 1 Spencer, L. J., Note on ‘feather-ore’ … Min. Mag., 1907, vol. 14, p. 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 184 note 2 Gordon, S. G., Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 1922, vol. 74, p. 101 Google Scholar [Min. Abstr., 2-11].

page 184 note 3 Shannon, E. V. and Short, M. N., Amér. Min., 1927, vol. 12, p. 405.Google Scholar; Wherry, E. T., ibid., 1928, vol. 13, p. 29 Google Scholar [Min. Abstr., 3-453].