Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T12:07:30.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The fibrous Gypsum of Nottinghamshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

W. Alfred Richardson
W. Alfred Richardson*
Affiliation:
University College, Nottingham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The Upper Triassic sediments are assumed to have contained concentrated solutions, which caused, or contributed to, their dehydration and contraction. The contraction of a colloidal mass results in the production of tension planes, and unless compensated by settlement, rupture finally ensues. Relief of pressure by rupture may bring the sohtions into the labile state, when innumerable closely-spaced centres of crystallization will be set up. The crystals, fed by vertically diffusing solutions, grow vertically, so long as contraction and feeding continue. When, at length, contraction attains its limit, further growth is resisted, and the stresses set up, transmitted to the central parting, produce bending and other pressure effects in the veins.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 19 , Issue 91 , December 1920 , pp. 77 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1920

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 77 note 1 Smith, B., The Chellaston Breccia...Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., 1919, vol. 74, p. 174 (Min. A.batr., vol. 1, p. 105)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

page 77 note 2 For a general account of the deposits see : A. T. Motcalfo, Trans. Inst. Min. Eng., 1896-1897, vol. 12, p. 107 ; Special Rep. Min. Res. Great Britain, Mem. Geol. Surv., 1915, vol. 3, Gypsum and Anhydrite, p. 20.

page 78 note 1 I am indebted to the generosity of Dr. W. D. Lang for information concerning ‘beef’ veins.

page 87 note 1 Irving, A., Prec. Geol. Assoc., 1876, vol. 4, p. 76. Geol. of the Country around Lincoln, Morn. Geol. Surv., 1888, p. 8.Google Scholar Goodchild, J. G., Prec. Geol. Assoc., 1888, vol. 10, p. 429.Google Scholar T.O. Boswortb, The Keuper Marls of Charnwood Forest. Leicester, 1912. Smith, B., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., 1919, vol. 74, p. 200.Google Scholar

page 88 note 1 Graham, R P. D., Econ. Geol., 1917, vol. 12, p. 188 (Min. Abstr.,vol. 1, p. 105)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

page 88 note 2 Smith, B., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., 1919, vol. 74, p. 200.Google Scholar

page 89 note 1 Taber, S., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 1916, vol. 2, pp. 659–664 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Trans. Amer. Inst. Min. Eng., 1918, vol. 57, pp. 62-98 ; Journ. Geol., 1918, vol. 26, pp. 56-73 (Min. Abstr., vol. 1, pp. 104, 105).

page 90 note 1 Richardson, W. A., Mineralog. Mag., 1919, vol. 18, p. 330 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

page 90 note 2 J. A. Dresser, Canada, Geol. Survey, 1913, Mem. 22 ; Graham, R. P. D., Econ. Geol., 1917, vol. 12, p. 156 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

page 90 note 3 Taber, S., Amer. Journ. Sci. 1916, Ser. 4, vol. 41, pp. 532–556 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 1917, vol. 8, pp. 297-302 (Min. Abstr., vol. 1, p. 104).