Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T06:40:33.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental studies of apatite crystallization in parts of the system CaO-P2O5-H2O at 1000 bars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

G. M. Biggar*
Affiliation:
Grant Institute of Geology, University of Edinburgh

Summary

Solid-liquid-vapour phase equilibria for the join Ca(OH)2-Ca3(PO4)2-H2O at 1000 bars are determined in the temperature range 700 to 950°C. The isobaric invariant equilibrium portlandite + hydroxyapatite → liquid on the join Ca(OH)2-Ca3(PO4)2 involves a liquid with the composition 96 wt. % Ca(OH)2, 4 wt. % Ca2(PO4)2 and occurs at 765°C. The isobaric invariant equilibrium portlandite + hydroxyapatite + vapour → liquid on the join Ca(OH)2-Ca3(PO4)2-H2O is encountered at 735°C, and involves a liquid containing 92 wt. % Ca(OH)2, 4 wt. % Ca3(PO4)2, and 4 wt. % H2O. The apatites are shown by X-ray diffraction techniques to vary in composition with changes in the bulk composition from which crystallization occurred.

The apatite liquidus is steep; apatite is the first mineral to crystallize from calcium-hydroxide-rich liquids containing as little as 4 wt. % Ca2(PO4)2 (1·8 % P2O5) at temperatures as low as 735°C in the presence of vapour at 1000 bars pressure; and rapid crystal settling of apatite was experimentally noted. These observations suggest that concentrations of apatite in carbonatites are the result of crystal accumulation from liquids relatively poor in P2O5.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Biggar, (G. M.) and Wyllie, (P. J.), 1962. Program for 43rd Annual Meeting of American Geophysical Union, p. 70.Google Scholar
Dallemagne, (M. J.), Brasseur, (H.), and Melon, (J.), 1949. Bull. Soc. Chem. Biologique, vol. 31, p. 425.Google Scholar
Eitel, (W.), 1924. Schr. konigsb, gelehrt. Ges. naturwiss. KI., Jahrb. 1, p. 159.Google Scholar
Hayek, (H.), Böhler, (W.), and Lechleitner, (J.), 1958. Zeits. anorg. Chem., vol. 295, p. 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perloff, (A.) and Posner, (A.S.), 1956. Science, vol. 124, p. 583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ST. Pierre, (P. D. S.), 1953. Canada Department of Mines and Technical Surveys, Technical paper No. 2.Google Scholar
Simpson, (D. R.) and Roland, (G.), 1962. Program for the Annual Meeting of the Geological Society of America, p. 144A.Google Scholar
Wazer, (J. R. Van), 1958. Phosphorus and its compounds, voL 1. Interscience Publ.Google Scholar
Wyllie, (P. J.), Cox, (K. G.), and Biggar, (G. M.), 1962. Journ. Petrology, vol. 3, p. 238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyllie, (P. J.) and Raynor, (E. J.), 1965. Amer. Min., vol. 50, p. 2077.Google Scholar
Wyllie, (P. J.) and Tuttle, (O. F.), 1960. Journ. Petrology, vol. 1, p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar