Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T20:35:47.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Eighth list of new mineral names1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

L. J. Spencer*
Affiliation:
Mineral Department of the British Museum

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1919

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Previous lists of this series have been given at the ends of vols. xi-xvii (1897-1916) of this Magazine. A few older names, not given in Dana (System of Mineralogy, 6th edit., 1892) or Chester (Dictionary of the names of minerals, 1896), are also included.

A long list of names of gem-minerals has recentlybeen published by W. T. Schaller ('Gems and precious stones in 1917.' Mineral Resources, United States Geol. Survey, for 1917, 1918, part II, pp. 147-168). Many of these are quite trivial and have been introduced solely for trade purposes. Only a selection of them, for which bibliographical references could be traced, are included in the present list. One is inclined to deal with such names in the manner of Adam Littleton, who in the preface to his 'Latine Dictionary' (London, 1678)writes: ' As to the Chymical terms of Paracelsus, (which have formerly pestered Latinity) and other strange words used by men of his Tribe, which have no aternity with Latine or Greek, they are wholly omitted, and not so much as set down amongst the Barbarous.'

References

1 Only the more important names given in the preceding alphabetical list are hero included.