Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:16:46.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aspects of the geochemistry of arsenic and antimony, exemplified by the Skaergaard intrusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

J. Esson ,
R. H. Stevens  and
E. A. Vincent
J. Esson
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Manchester
R. H. Stevens
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Manchester
E. A. Vincent
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Manchester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The distribution of As and Sb in a series of Skaergaard rocks and some of their minerals has been investigated using neutron activation analysis, and the geochemical behaviour of these elements during the fractionation of a basic magma is discussed.

It is concluded that As3+ is probably accepted into octahedral lattice sites usually occupied by Fe3+, Mg2+, Ti4+, and Al3+, and that there is also some substitution of As5+ for Si4+ and Al3+ in tetrahedral sites. There is a strong tendency for the element to concentrate in both interstitial and late-stage liquids.

Sb seems to show a marked preferential entry into early (magnesian) olivines, as in the case of Ni. The analytical results indicate that the substitution of Sb3+ for Fe2+ probably accounts for most of the Sb in silicate and oxide minerals. The tendency for Sb to concentrate in the residual Skaergaard liquids is less marked than in the case of As, but greater than in the cases of V, Cr, and Ni.

As and Sb have also been determined in four chondritic meteorites, in which the As/Sb ratio ranges from 8·5–12·4. Analyses for As and Sb in the standard rock powders G-1 and W-1 have also been made.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 35 , Issue 269 , March 1965 , pp. 88 - 107
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahrens, (L. R.), 1952. Geochimica Acta, vol. 2, pp. 159–169.Google Scholar
Baak, (T.), 1959. Journ. Amer. Ceram. Soe., vol. 42, pp. 27–29.Google Scholar
Close, (P.), Srephrd, (H. M.), and Drummond, (C. H.), 1958. Ibid., vol. 41, pp. 455–460.Google Scholar
Fleischer, (M.) and Stevens, (R. E.), 1962. Geoehimica Acta, vol. 26, pp. 525–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamaguchi, (H.), Kuroda, (R.), Tomura, (K.), Osawa, (M.), Watanabe, (K.), Onvma, (N.), Yasvnaga, (T.), Hosohara, (K.), and Endo, (T.), 1961. Ibid., vol. 23, pp. 296–298.Google Scholar
Onishi, (H.) and Sandell, (E. B.), 1955a. Ibid., vol. 7, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Onishi, (H.) and Sandell, (E. B.), 1955b. Ibid., vol. 8, pp. 213–221.Google Scholar
Onishi, (H.) and Sandell, (E. B.), 1960. Quoted in U.S. Geol. Survey Bull. No. 1113, p. 85.Google Scholar
Rafter, (T. A.), 1950. Analyst, vol. 75, pp. 485–488.Google Scholar
Rankama, (K.) and Sahama, (Th. G.), 1950. Geochemistry (Univ. of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringwood, (A. E.), 1955. Geochimica Aeta, vol. 7, pp. 189–202, 242-254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smales, (A. A.), Mapper, (D.), Morgan, (J. W.), Webster, (R. K.), and Wood (A. J.), 1958. 2nd U.N. Int. Conf. Peace. Uses Atomic Energy, May, 1958, paper P 282.Google Scholar
Smales, (A. A.), Mapper, (D.), Wood, (A. J.), and Salmon, (L.), 1957. Atomic Energy Research Establ. Report, C/R 2254.Google Scholar
Smales, (A. A.) and Pate, (B. D.), 1952a. Anal. Chem., vol. 24, pp. 717–721.Google Scholar
Smales, (A. A.) and Pate, (B. D.), 1952b. Analyst, vol. 77, pp. 188–195.Google Scholar
Vincent, (E. A.) and Bilefield, (L. I.), 1960. Geochimica Acta, vol. 19, pp. 63–69.Google Scholar
Vincent, (E. A.) and Crocket, (J. H.), 1960. Ibid., vol. 18, pp. 130–142.Google Scholar
Wager, (L. R.), 1960. Journ. Petrology, vol. 1, pp. 364–398.Google Scholar
Wager, (L. R.), Brown, (G. M.), and Wadsworth, (W. J.), 1960. Ibid., vol. 1, pp. 73–85.Google Scholar
Wager, (L. R.) and Deer, (W. A.), 1939. Medd. om Gronland, vol. 105, No. 4.Google Scholar
Wager, (L. R.) and Mitchell, (R. L.), 1951. Geochimica Acta, vol. 1, pp. 129–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wager, (L. R.) and Vincent, (E. A.), 1962. Min. Mag., vol. 33, pp. 26–36.Google Scholar
Wager, (L. R.), and Smales, (A. A.), 1957. Econ. Geol., vol. 52, pp. 855–903.Google Scholar
Ward, (F. N.) and Lakin, (H. W.), 1954. Anal. Chem., vol. 26, pp. 1168–1173.Google Scholar