Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:24:48.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An investigation of high-temperature optics in some naturally occurring plagioclases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Olive Bradley
Olive Bradley*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, King's College, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For several years now it. has been generally appreciated that plagioclase felspar formed at high temperature differs optically from that formed at lower temperatures. Much of the evidence for this has been provided by the Austrian workers, notably Köhler (1-3), Scholler (4), and Tertsch (5-7), who have prepared revised curves to supplement the universal-stage stereograms of Reichert (which are for use with lowtemperature material). There are a number of interesting petrological points which have not yet been fully investigated. Much work has been done on synthetic material, and it is not clear to what extent the hightemperature forms occur naturally. There may be two distinct and separate types of plagioclase structure, or the two forms may grade into one another. It may be possible to explain the optical anomalies as an order-disorder phenomenon; a more disordered state has been 'frozenin' in those felspars which ha~e formed a.t a high temperature and cooled rapidly.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 30 , Issue 223 , December 1953 , pp. 227 - 245
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Köhler, (A.), Tschermaks Min. Petr. Mitt., 1941, vol. 53, p. 24. [M.A. 8-313.]Google Scholar
2. Köhler, (A.) Ibid., 1942, vol. 53, p. 159. [M.A. 8-313.]Google Scholar
3. Köhler, (A.) Journ. Geol. Chicago, 1949, vol. 57, p. 592. [M.A. 11-144.]Google Scholar
4. Scholler, (H.), Tschermaks Min. Petr. Mitt., 1942, vol. 53, p. 180. [M.A. 8-313.]Google Scholar
5. Tertsch, (H.), Ibid. 1941, vol. 53, p. 50. [M.A. 8-313.]Google Scholar
6. Tertsch, (H.), Zentralblatt Min., Abt. A, 1942, p. 137. [M.A. 8-313.]Google Scholar
7. Tertsch, (H.) Tschermaks Min. Petr. Mitt., 1942, vol. 54, p. 193. [M.A. 9-270.]Google Scholar
8. Reynolds, (D. L.), Geol. Mag. Hertford, 1952, vol. 89, p. 233. [M.A. 12-137.]Google Scholar
9. Barth, (T. F. W.), Norsk Geol. Tidsskrift, 1931, vol. 12, p. 57. [M.A. 5-218.]Google Scholar
10. Barber, (C. T.), Min. Mag., 1936, vol. 24, p. 343.Google Scholar
ll. Oftedahl, (C.), Norsk Geol. Tidsskrift, 1944, vol. 24, p. 75. [M.A. 9-270.]Google Scholar
12. Oftedahl, (C.) Ibid., 1947, vol. 26, p. 158. [M.A.10-267.]Google Scholar
13. Barth, (T. F. W.) and Oftedahl, (C.), Trans. Amer. Geophysical Union, 1947, vol. 28, no. 1, p. 102.Google Scholar
14. Sørensen, (H.), Meddel. Dansk Geol. Forening, 1950, vol. ll, pp. 522. [M.A. 11-388.]Google Scholar
15. Turner, (F. J.), Amer. Min., 1947, vol. 32, p. 389.Google Scholar
16. Wells, (A. K.), Min. Mag., 1952, vol. 29, p. 913.Google Scholar
17. Reinhard, (M.), Universal Drehtischmethoden. Basle, 1931. [M.A. 4-435.]Google Scholar
18. Cole, (W. F.), Sörum, (H.), and Taylor, (W. H.), Acta Cryst., 1951, vol. 4, p. 20. [M.A. 11-427.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Emmons, (R. C.), The universal stage. Mem. Geol. Soc. Amer., 1943, no. 8. [M.A. 9-18.]Google Scholar
20. Chudora, (K.), The determination of the feldspars in thin section. London, 1933. [M.A. 5-386.]Google Scholar
21. Chayes, (F.), Amer. Journ. Sci., 1952, Bowen vol., p. 85. [M.A. 12-134.]Google Scholar