Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T09:47:00.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Feasibility of Micro-Analysis in Southwestern Archaeological Sites1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2018

Richard H. Brooks
Richard H. Brooks*
Affiliation:
University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Midden analyses were made from 15 sample columns raken at four Wetherill Mesa sites in Mesa Verde National Park. The components in these columns were studied in accordance with methods that have proved successful at California archaeological sites. The sampling did no more than reflect data already established by standard procedures regarding the life of the prehistoric inhabitants. The number of sample columns was much too small to determine conclusively whether this type of analysis can be useful for Southwestern sites.

Type
4 Techniques
Information
Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology , Volume 19: Contributions of the Wetherill Mesa Archeological Project , October 1965 , pp. 182 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1965 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

This is Contribution No. 19 of the Wetherill Mesa Archeological Project.

References

Ascher, Robert 1959 A Prehistoric Population Estimate Using Midden Analysis and Two Population Models. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 168–78. Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Brooks, Richard H. 1962 A Midden Analysis from Four Archaeological Sites in the Mesa Verde Region, Colorado. Master's thesis on file at the University of California Library, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Cook, S. F. and Treganza, A. E. 1950 The Quantitative Investigation of Indian Mounds: With Special Reference to the Relation of the Physical Components to the Probable Material Culture. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 40, No. 5, pp. 223–62. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Curtis, Freddie 1961 Excavations at Goleta: Part 3: Microanalysis. Archaeological Survey Annual Report, 1960-1961. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Curtis, Freddie 1963 Arroyo Sequit. Interpretive Services Section, Report 9. State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation, Division of Beaches and Parks, Sacramento.Google Scholar
Gifford, Edward W. 1916 Composition of California Shellmounds. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 1–29. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Greengo, R. E. 1951 Molluscan Species in California Shell Middens. University of California Archaeological Survey, No. 13. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Greenwood, Roberta S. 1961 Quantitative Analysis of Shells from a Site in Goleta, California. American Antiquity, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 416–20. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Heizer, R. F. and Cook, S. F. 1956 Some Aspects of the Quantitative Approach in Archaeology. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 229–48. Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Mathews, Thomas W. 1962 Identification of Unworked Bone Collections: Mammals. Manuscript, Mesa Verde National Park, Colorado.Google Scholar
Rohn, Arthur H. 1965 The Excavation of Mug House, Wetherill Mesa. National Park Service Archeological Research Series (in press). Washington.Google Scholar