Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T10:24:18.455Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Problems related to delimiting the culture areas of Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2018

Elizabeth E. Bacon*
Affiliation:
Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri

Extract

Since 1944, the writer has given some thought to the problems of marking out the culture areas of Asia, although there has not been opportunity for anything like a comprehensive trait distribution study of the continent (Bacon & Hudson, 1945; Bacon, 1946). This paper, then, must be regarded only as a tentative second step in formulating some of the problems involved, and in mapping the culture areas of the continent (cf. Naroll, 1950, for mapping of Bacon, 1946).

Sapir defined culture areas as “groups of geographically contiguous tribes that exhibit so many cultural traits in common as to contrast with other such groups” (1949, p. 425). Although in Asia we are frequently dealing with nations rather than with tribes, Sapir's definition appears for the most part to be as acceptable for Asia as Wissler and Kroeber found it for North America and Herskovits for Africa.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Since this paper was written, Dr. Raphael Patai (1952) has described a Middle Eastern area of comparable magnitude.