Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T13:41:20.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Revision of the Nearctic Species of Fanniinae (Diptera: Muscidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

J. G. Chillcott
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
The Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada , Volume 92 , Supplement S14 , 1960 , pp. 5 - 295
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Based on a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Ph.D. degree at the University of Kansas, May, 1958.

References

Index to Genera and Species

Aczél, M. 1938. Beiträge zur Kenntnis des Muscidenfauna des Komitates Bars. Allatani Kozlemenyek 35 pp. (Hungarian records—9 spp.).Google Scholar
Aczél, M. 1940. Beiträge, Nachtrage und Berichtungen zur Kenntnis des Muscidenfauna Ungarns. Fragm. Faun. Hungar. 3: 30–44 (records 16 spp.).Google Scholar
Albuquerque D., de O. 1956. Fauna do Distrito Federal XXXI. Contribuição ao conhecimento de Euryomma Stein, 1899, com discração de una especie nova (Diptera, Muscidae). Bol. Mus. Nac., Rio de Janeiro; Zool. 36: 1–7.Google Scholar
Aldrich, J. M. 1905. Catalogue of North American Diptera. No. 1444 Smithsonian Misce'laneous Collections (notes and synonymy of 30 spp.).Google Scholar
d'Assis-Fonseca, E. C. M. 1956. A review of the British subfamilies and genera of the family Muscidae (Diptera). Trans. Soc. Brit. Ent. 12: 113–128.Google Scholar
Atkinson, E. L. 1916. The fly pest in Gallipoli. Journ. R. Naval Med. Service, London 2: 147–152 (canicularis and scalaris common: in Gallipoli, R.A.E.B. 4, p. 91).Google Scholar
Aubrook, E. W. 1939. Insects bred from owl-pellets. Ent. Monthly Mag. 75: 88 (aerea reared).Google Scholar
Audcent, H. L. F. 1932. Bristol insect fauna, Diptera (part V). Rep. Bristol Nat. Soc. (4) 7: 358–370 (not seen).Google Scholar
Audcent, H. L. F. 1951. Midnight flies. Ent. Monthly Mag. 87: 133 (similis Stein attracted by mercury vapor lamp).Google Scholar
Baranov, N. 1939. Dung heaps as breeding places of flies in the village of Mratzlin. Vet. Arkiv. 9: 280–287 (canicularis and scalaris from dung, R.A.E.B. 27: 168).Google Scholar
Barnes, A. M. 1958. Fannia canicularis in nests of deer mice. Calif. Vector Views 5 (7): 48.Google Scholar
Bezzi, M. 1925. Missione del Dr. E. Festa in Cirenaica XI. Ditteri di Cirenaica. Boll. Mus. Zool. Anat. Comp. Univ. Torino 39 (1924), no. 18, 26 pp. (canicularis recorded).Google Scholar
Bezzi, M. 1926. Ditteri del Giglio. Ann. Mus. Civ. Stor. Nat. Genova 50: 291–354 (not seen).Google Scholar
Bezzi, M., and Lamb, C. G.. 1926. Diptera (excluding Nematocera) from the Island of Rodriguez. Trans. Ent. Soc. London, 1925, pp. 537–573 (leucosticta from Seychelles).Google Scholar
Bigot, J. M. F. 1882. Diptères Nouveaux ou Peu Connus, 19ème partie (1), No. XXIX. Genres Roeselia, Actia, Melia, Phytomyptera et Tribu des Anthomyzidae. Ann. Ent. Soc. France (6) 2: 6–21 (key includes Homalomyia, Faunia, Parmalomyia and Piezura).Google Scholar
Bigot, J. M. F. 1885. Diptères Nouveaux ou Peu Connus, 25ème partie (1), No. XXXIII. Anthomyzides nouvelles. Ann. Soc. Ent. France (6) 4: 263–304 (canicularis recorded, four new spp. described).Google Scholar
Bigot, J. M. F. 1887. Diptères. Miss. Sci. Cap Horn. 6 (2) Ins. 5: 1–45 (Homalomyia used) (not seen).Google Scholar
Boheman, C. H. 1851. Entomologiska anteckningar under en rosa i Södra Sverige. K. Svensk. Vet. Akad. Handl., pp. 53–210 (not seen).Google Scholar
Bonnamour, S. 1926. Élevages et nouvelle liste de Diptères fongicoles. Ann. Soc. Linn. Lyon (n.s.) 72: 85–93 (not seen).Google Scholar
Bouché, P. F. 1834. Naturgeschichte der Insecten besonders in Hinsicht ihrer ersten Zustände als Larven und Puppen. Berlin, Nicolai. 8. Erste Lieferung. Naturgesch. Ins. I, v + 216 pp. (section on Homalomyia).Google Scholar
Brauns, A. 1949. In Deutschland und Schleswig-Holstein neueaufgefundene Zweifluglerarten. Entomon. 1: 155–161, two Figs, (not seen).Google Scholar
Brauns, A. 1950a. Terricole Dipterenlarven. Göttingen 179 pp., 96 Abb., 6 Tafel. (ecology and description of scalaris).Google Scholar
Brauns, A. 1950b. Nachr. Bl. Dtsch. Pfl. Sch. Dienst. Braunsweig 2: 158 (not seen).Google Scholar
Brauns, A. 1954. Puppen terricoler Dipterenlarven. Göttingen 156 pp., 97 Abb., 50 Tafeln.Google Scholar
Brooks, F. E. 1922. Curculios that attack the young fruits and shoots of walnut and hickory. Bull. U.S. Dept. Agr. 1066: 1–16 (canicularis reared in large numbers from Conotrachelus sp.).Google Scholar
Bryan, E. H. 1934. A review of the Hawaiian Diptera, with descriptions of new species. Proc. Hawaiian Ent. Soc. 8: 399–468 (records three spp.).Google Scholar
Buchanan, R. M. 1916. Insects in relation to disease. Glasgow Med. Journ. 85: 1–24 (general notes, R.A.E.B. 4: 45).Google Scholar
Burnett, H. S., Parmelee, W. E., Lee, R. D., and Wagner, E. D.. 1957. Observations on the life-cycle of Thelazia californiensis Price, 1930. Journ. Parasit. 43 (4): 433. (canicularis and benjamini implicated as vectors).Google Scholar
Charrier, H. 1927. Note préliminaire sur les mouches de la région de Tanger. Bull. Soc. Path. Exot. 20 (7): 619–622 (not seen).Google Scholar
Chevrel, R. 1909. Sur la myiase des voies urinaires. Arch. Parasit. 12: 369–450 (not seen).Google Scholar
Chillcott, J. G. 1958a. The comparative morphology of the male genitalia of muscoid Diptera. Proc. Tenth Int. Congr. Ent. 1: 587–592.Google Scholar
Chillcott, J. G. 1958b. Two new species of Euryomma Stein (Muscidae: Diptera) from Panama. Can. Ent. 90: 725–731.Google Scholar
Collin, J. E. 1924. On the Diptera (other than Nematocera) of Jan Mayen Island. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (9) 14: 204–6 (note on occurrence of incisurata).Google Scholar
Collin, J. E. 1925. Diptera (Cyclorrhapha) from Spitsbergen. Results of the Oxford University Expedition to Spitsbergen 1924. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (9) 16: 332. (occurrence of canicularis on ship).Google Scholar
Collin, J. E. 1933. Notes on Perthshire Anthomyiidae, etc. Scott. Nat. 202: 119–123 (note on atra = carteri).Google Scholar
Collin, J. E. 1939. On various new or little known British Diptera including several species bred from the nests of birds and mammals. Ent. Monthly Mag. 75: 134–154 (four n.spp., notes on 11 others, key to canicularis group).Google Scholar
Collin, J. E. 1953. Some additional British Anthomyiidae (Diptera). Journ. Soc. Brit. Ent. 4: 169–177 (record of aequilineata).Google Scholar
Collin, J. E. 1958. Notes on some British species of Fannia (Dipt., Muscidae) with the description of a new species. Ent. Monthly Mag. 94: 86–92 (two n.spp. described, notes on many other spp.).Google Scholar
Colyer, C. N. 1954. A new species of Megaselia (Dipt., Phoridae) from Britain: Notes on British fungicolous Phoridae. Ent. Monthly Mag. 90: 108–112 (monilis Stein reared).Google Scholar
Coquillett, D. W. 1900. Papers from the Harriman Alaska Expedition. Entomological Results (3) Diptera. Proc. Washington Acad. 2: 389–464. (H. flavivaria described).Google Scholar
Cunningham, H. B., Little, C. D., Edgar, S. A., and Eden, W. G.. 1955. Species and relative abundance of flies collected from chicken manure in Alabama. Journ. Econ. Ent. 48: 620–621 (pusto, canicularis and manicata).Google Scholar
Curran, C. H. 1930. Report on the Diptera collected at the Station for the study of Insects, Harriman Interstate Park, N.Y. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 61: 21–115. (pretiosina, n.sp., notes on four others, two at honeydew).Google Scholar
Curran, C. H. 1934. The families and genera of North American Diptera. Ballou Press, New York, 512 pp.Google Scholar
Curtis, J. 1860. Farm insects. London, Blackie. 594 pp. (tuberosa, n.sp.) (not seen).Google Scholar
Cuthbertson, A. 1934. Biological notes on some Diptera in Southern Rhodesia. Proc. Trans. Rhodesián Sci. Assoc. 33: 32–50 (not seen).Google Scholar
Czerny, L. 1930. Dipteren auf Schnee und in Hohlen. Mitt. Naturw. Mus. Sofia 3: 113–118.Google Scholar
Degeer, C. 1776. Mémoires pour servir à l'histoire des Insectes, Vol. VI. Stockholm, vi + 522 pp.Google Scholar
Derbeneva-Ukhova, V. P. 1940. Sur l'écologie des mouches de fumier à Kabarda [In Russian]. Med. Parasit. 9: 323–339 (R.A.E.B. 31: 124, note on scalaris).Google Scholar
Dodge, H. R. 1951. The occurrence of certain Palaearctic species of muscoid Diptera in the United States. Proc. Ent. Soc. Washington 53: 341–342 (difficilis recorded).Google Scholar
Dufour, L. 1839. Mémoires sur les métamorphoses de plusieurs larves fongivores appartenant à des diptères. Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool. 12: 5–60, 3 plates.Google Scholar
Dufour, L. 1840. Seconde mémoire sur les métamorphoses de plusieurs larves fongivores appartenant à des diptères (Sapromyza). Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool. 13: 148–163.Google Scholar
Enderlein, G. 1903. Wiss. Ergebn. Deutsch. Tiefsee-Exped. 3: 200–204 (not seen).Google Scholar
Enderlein, G. 1936. Zweiflügler, Diptera. Tierwelt Mitteleuropas 16. Leipsig 6, Teil 3, xvi + 259 pp.Google Scholar
Eastwood, R., and Tuff, D.. 1957. A new source of Fannia canicularis in Santa Clara County. Calif. Vector Views 4: 65 (breeding in chrysanthemum beds).Google Scholar
Engel, O. 1931. Die Ausbeute des deutschen Chaco-Expedition 1925–26, Diptera XXVII, Muscidae. Konowia 10: 133–156 (femoralis recorded from South America).Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. 1775. Systema Entomologiae. Flensburg, Kortius, xxx + 832 pp.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. 1781. Species Insectorum. Hamburg, viii + 1046 pp.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. 1787. Mantissa Insectorum II. Hafniae, xx + 722 pp.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. 1794. Entomologica Systematica 4. Hafniae, vi + 434 pp.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. 1805. Systema Antliatorum, Brunsvigae, xiv + 372 pp.Google Scholar
Falcoz, L. 1923. Observations biologiques sur divers insectes des environs de Vienne en Dauphine. Bull. Soc. Em. France (1923), pp. 261–263 (incisurata and canicularis from birds' nests).Google Scholar
Falcoz, L. 1927. Same title as above. Bull. Soc. Ent. France (1927), pp. 226–232 (canicularis from fungi).Google Scholar
Falcoz, L. 1930. Same title as above. Bull. Soc. Em. France (1930), pp. 148–154 (canicularis from fungi).Google Scholar
Fallén, C. F. 1824. Monographia Muscidum Succiae. Pars. 7: 65–72 Dissert. Lund., Berlin.Google Scholar
Fallén, C. F. 1825. Monographia Muscidum Sueciae. Pars. 8: 73–80 Dissert. Lund., Berlin.Google Scholar
Fischer, E. and P. 1927. Observations et expériences sur les evolutions des mouches pendant le vol. Les réactions au mouvement. Bull. Biol. France Belg. 61: 397–427 (not seen).Google Scholar
Foreman, F. W., and Graham-Smith, G. S.. 1917. Investigations on the prevention of nuisances arising from flies and putrefaction. Journ. Hyg. 16: 109–226 (R.A.E.B. 6: 25—species prevalent in Gallipoli).Google Scholar
Forsius, R. 1925. Über einen in Finland beobachteten Fall von Fanniasis (Myiasis) intestinalis. Notulae Ent. 5: 50–53 (scalaris and canicularis).Google Scholar
Frauenfeld, G. R. 1867. Zoologische Miscellen XI. Verhandl. Zool.-bot. Ges. Wien 17: 425–502 (pseudomollicula, n.sp.).Google Scholar
Frey, R. 1908. Anmärknungsvärda Anthomyid-fynd fran Finland. Medd. Soc. Fauna Flora Fenn. 34: 117–122.Google Scholar
Frey, R. 1916. In Poppius, Lundstrom and Frey, Dipteren aus dem Sarekgebiet, Naturwiss. Unters. Sarekgeb. 4: 691.Google Scholar
Frey, R. 1937. Die Dipteren fauna der Kanarischen Inseln und ihre probleme. Comment. Biol. Soc. Sci. Fenn. 6 (1): 1–237 (six species listed).Google Scholar
Frey, R. 1939. Comment. Biol. Soc. Sci. fenn. 8 (not seen).Google Scholar
Gaminara, A. 1930. Ann. Facult. Med. Montevideo 13: 1253 (not seen).Google Scholar
Giglio-Tos, E. 1895. Ditteri del Messico IV. Memoria della R. Acad. delle Scienze de Torino 45: 73 pp. (mexicana, n. sp.).Google Scholar
Gill, G. D. 1955. Filth flies of central Alaska. Journ. Econ. Ent. 48: 648–653 (notes on six spp.).Google Scholar
Goetghebuer, M. 1929. Note sur un cas de myiase intestinale. Ann. Soc. Ent. Belg. 68: 237–239 (scalaris and vomitoria).Google Scholar
Graham-Smith, G. S. 1913. Flies in Relation to Disease. Cambridge University Press, 292 pp. (notes on canicularis and scalaris) (not seen).Google Scholar
Graham-Smith, G. S. 1916. Observations on the habits and parasites of common flies. Parasit. 8: 440–544 (biology and occurrence of scalaris, canicularis and armata).Google Scholar
Grensted, L. W. 1944. Records of Diptera and other insects from Dines Head, Pembrokeshire. Ent. Monthly Mag. 80: 201–203 (lists four spp.).Google Scholar
Grensted, L. W. 1949. Some records of Diptera in Anglesey, Derbyshire and Cheshire. Ent. Monthly Mag. 85: 99 (mutica record).Google Scholar
Grimshaw, P. H. 1901. Fauna Hawaiiensis. Diptera, 17 pp. (dubia, n.sp.).Google Scholar
Grimshaw, P. H., and Speiser, P.. 1902. Fauna Hawaiiensis 3, pt. 2, Diptera suppl.: 79–92 (femorata recorded).Google Scholar
Hagen, H. A. 1881. List of North American Anthomyiidae examined by R. H. Meade, Esq., Bradford, England. Can. Ent. 13: 43–51 (five spp. in Loew collection).Google Scholar
Haliday, A. H. 1837. Notes, etc. upon Diptera 2: Characters of some undescribed species of Muscidae. Ent. Mag. 4: 149–152 (aprica, n.sp., and notes on several other spp.).Google Scholar
Haliday, A. H. 1838. Descriptions of new British insects indicated in Mr. Curtis' Guide. Ann. Nat. Hist. 2: 183–190.Google Scholar
Haliday, A. H. 1840. In Westwood, an Introduction to the Modern Classification of Insects 2, 158 pp. (note on Homalomyia—footnote describes Coelomyia).Google Scholar
Hamm, A. H. 1926. The biology of the British Crabronidae. Trans. Ent. Soc. London 74: 297–331 (several species of Fannia listed as prey).Google Scholar
Harrison, R. A. 1953. Notes on Diptera. The New Zealand Entomologist 1: 9–10 (on Euryomma).Google Scholar
Hartig, T. 1838. Jahresberichte über die Fortschulte der Forstwissenschaft und forstlichen Naturkunde nebst Original-Abhandlungen aus dem Gebiete dieser Wissenschaften, Berlin, 1, Heft 2: 174–210 (A. pini described) (not seen).Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1948. Über einiger verkannte Dipteren-Gattungen. Acta Zool. Lilloana 6: 169–170 (B. pygmaea = F. parva).Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1950. Zeitschr. Hygien. Zool. 38 (not seen).Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1952. Die Larvenformen der Dipteren 3, Berlin, vii + 628 pp.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1955. Muscidae, in Linder, Die Fliegen der Palaearktischen Region, 63b. Lieferungen 182 and 185, 96 pp. (detailed revisionary treatment of Palaearctic spp.).Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1956. As above. Lieferung 194: 97–144 (Coelomyia supergressa, n.sp.).Google Scholar
Henriksen, K. L. 1939. A revised index of the insects of Grønland. Meddel. Grønl. 119 (10), 111 pp. (list—three spp.).Google Scholar
Henriksen, K. L., and Lundblad, W.. 1917. Grønlands Landarthropoden (Insecta et Arachnids Groenlandica). Meddel. Grønl. 22: 481–823 (canicularis and armata).Google Scholar
Hewitt, C. G. 1912. Fannia (Homalomyia) canicularis Linn, and F. scalaris Fab. Parasitology 5: 161–174 (biology and description).Google Scholar
Hewitt, C. G. 1914a. On the predaceous habits of Scatophaga, a new enemy of Musca domestica. Can. Ent. 46: 2–3 (canicularis attacked).Google Scholar
Hewitt, C. G. 1914b. The housefly, Musca domestica. Manchester (canicularis and scalaris notes).Google Scholar
Howard, L. O. 1900. A contribution to the study of the insect fauna of human excrement (with special reference to the spread of typhoid fever). Proc. Wash. Acad. Sci. 2: 541–604.Google Scholar
Huckett, H. C. 1934. Notes on Francis Walker's type specimens of North American anthomyid flies in the British Museum (Muscidae, Diptera). Can. Ent. 66: 132–140.Google Scholar
Hutton, F. W. 1901. Synopsis of the Diptera Brachycera of New Zealand. Trans. and Proc. New Zealand Inst. 33: 1–95 (not seen).Google Scholar
Illingworth, J. F. 1917. Notes on two species of Hawaiian Diptera. Proc. Hawaiian Ent. Soc. 3: 270–272 (details on pusto).Google Scholar
Illingworth, J. F. 1922a. Insect fauna of hen manure. Proc. Hawaiian Ent. Soc. 5: 270–273 (biology of pusio).Google Scholar
Illingworth, J. F. 1922b. House flies. Proc. Hawaiian Ent. Soc. 5: 275–276 (canicularis record).Google Scholar
Illingworth, J. F. 1922c. Insects attracted to carrion in Hawaii. Proc. Hawaiian Ent. Soc. 5: 280–281 (pusio).Google Scholar
Illingworth, J. F. 1926a. The common muscoid flies occurring about sweatshops in Yokohama, Japan. Proc. Hawaiian Ent. Soc. (1925) 6: 260–261 (scalaris and canicularis).Google Scholar
Illingworth, J. F. 1926b. Insects attracted to carrion in Southern California. Proc. Hawaiian Ent. Soc. 6: 397–401 (scalaris, canicularis, and femoralis).Google Scholar
Jack, R. W. 1935. The report of the chief entomologist for the year ending 31st December 1934. Rhodesian Journ. Agrie. 32: 558–581 (canicularis from dead locusts).Google Scholar
James, M. T. 1947. The flies that cause myiasis in man. U.S.D.A. Misc. Publ. 631, 175 pp.Google Scholar
Johannsen, O. H. 1916. New Eastern Anthomyiidae. Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc. 42: 385–398 (parallela, n.sp.).Google Scholar
Kabos, W. J. 1951. De Diptera Brachycera van het eiland Texel oecologisch beshouwd. Tijdschr. Ent. 93: 108–130 (canicularis and serena records).Google Scholar
Kabos, W. J. 1952. Nieweve Nederlandse Diptera. Tijdschr. Ent. 95: cxix (vespertilionis ex bat's nest).Google Scholar
Kadocsa, G. 1934. Madige Iris-Blütenknospen. Zeitschr. Pflanzkrankh. 44: 444–447 (canicu.laris common).Google Scholar
Karl, O. 1928. Zweiflügler oder Diptera. 3. Muscidae in Dahl, Die Tierwelt Deutschlands, Jena 13, 232 pp. (keys and descriptions—47 spp., spinosa, n.sp.).Google Scholar
Karl, O. 1935. Aussereuropäische Musciden (Anthomyiden) aus den Deutschen Entomologischen Institut. Arb. Morph. Tax. Ent. 2: 29–49 (four spp. recorded).Google Scholar
Karl, O. 1937. Die Fliegenfauna Pommerns. Diptera Brachycera. Stettin Ent. Ztg. 98: 125–159 (records 36 spp.).Google Scholar
Keilin, D. 1919. On the life-history and larval anatomy of Melinda cognata Meigen (Diptera, Calliphorinae) parasitic in the snail Helicella (Heliomanes) virgata da Costa with an account of the other Diptera living upon molluscs. Parasitology 11: 430–455 (canicularis common).Google Scholar
Keilin, D. 1924. On the life-history of Anthomyia procellaris Rond. and A. pluvialis L. inhabiting the nests of birds. Parasitology 16: 150–159 (Fannia sp. in nests).Google Scholar
Kidd, L. N. 1953. Some West Cheshire Diptera. Journ. Soc. Brit. Ent. 4: 137–138 (aerea record).Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. 1898. Descriptions de deux diptères fucivores recueillis aux Petites-Dalles (Seine-infer.). Ann. Soc. Ent. France 67: 100–104 (fucivorax, n.sp.).Google Scholar
Kloet, G. S., and Hincks, W. D.. 1945. Check list of British insects, 483 pp. (47 spp. listed).Google Scholar
Kobayashi, H. 1919. Chosen no Hai (Daiichi Hokoku). Flies in Korea. Report 1. Journ. Korean Med. Soc. Seoul 24: 29 pp. (R.A.E.B. 7: 142, canicularis note).Google Scholar
Kobayashi, H. 1930. Study on the seasonal prevalence of house flies in Chosen (Korea). Trans. 7th Congr. Far East Assoc. Trop. Med. (1927) 3: 186–195 (R.A.E.B. 18: 136, notes on canicularis and scalaris).Google Scholar
Kobayashi, H. 1938. Annot. Zool. Jabon 17 (not seen).Google Scholar
Kobayashi, H. 1940. Diapause of Fannia canicularis (in Japanese). Zool. Mag. 52(3): 118–119 (prepupal diapause probable).Google Scholar
Kramer, H. 1917. Abb. naturf. Ges. Görlitz 28: 40 (not seen).Google Scholar
Krogerus, R. 1932. Ueber die Oekolog'e und Verbreitung der Arthropoden der Triebsandgebiete an der Küsten Finnlands. Acta Zool. Fenn. 12: 1–308 (not seen).Google Scholar
Kubo, K. 1920. Common species of flies in houses in Manchuria. Tokyo Med. News 2180: 1085–1087 (R.A.E.B. 10: 45, canicularis and scalaris noted).Google Scholar
Laurence, B. R. 1958. Some flies bred from decaying vegetation in London. Ent. Record 70 (16): 167–168 (canicularis parasitized by Stilpnus gagates).Google Scholar
Lesne, P. 1921. La faune entomologique des fosses d'aisances de la région parisienne. Bull. Mus. Hist. Nat., Paris 27: 53–58.Google Scholar
Lesne, P. 1923. Same title as above. Bull. Mus. Hist. Nat., Paris 29: 161–167.Google Scholar
Lindroth, C. H. 1931. Die Insektenfauna Islands und ihre Probleme. Zool. Bidr. Uppsala 13: 105–600 (not seen).Google Scholar
Linné, C. von. 1761. Fauna Suecica Ed. II, Stockholm, Laur. Salvii. 578 pp.Google Scholar
Linné, C. von. 1767. Systema Naturae Ed. XII, I (2): 541–1327.Google Scholar
Lodge, O. C. 1916. Fly investigation report IV. Some enquiry into the question of baits and poisons for flies. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 3: 481–518 (notes on Fannia).Google Scholar
Lodge, O. C. 1918. An examination of the sense-reactions of flies. Bull. Ent. Res. 9: 141–143 (studies on Fannia and Musca).Google Scholar
Loew, H. 1861. Diptera aliquot in insula Cuba collecta. Weiner Ent. Monatschrift 5: 33–43 (femorata, n.sp.).Google Scholar
Loew, H. 1872. Diptera Americae Septentrionalis indigena. Berl. Ent. Zeit. 16: 49–124 (tetracantha, n.sp., notes on others).Google Scholar
Loew, H. 1873. Diptera nova in Pannonia inferiori et in confinibus Daciae regionibus a Ferd. Kowarzio capta. Beri. Ent. Zeit. 17: 33–52 (four n.spp.).Google Scholar
Lörincz, F., and Mihályi, F.. 1938. Untersuchungen über die hygienische Bedeutung der Fliegentrage in Ungarn. Allatani Koslemenyek 35: 1–13. (R.A.E.B. 27: 134, scalaris common in faeces).Google Scholar
Lundblad, O. 1933. Kålflugorna. Statens Växtskyddsanst. Meddel. 3: 1–103.Google Scholar
Lundblad, O. 1950. Studier över Insektenfaunen i Fiby urskog. Kgl. Svenska Vetensk. Akad. Avhandl. Naturskydds. 6, 235 pp., 8 pls., 12 Figs, (not seen).Google Scholar
McAtee, W. L. 1927. Notes on insect inhabitants of bird houses. Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 29 (4): 87–90 (nidicola from nest of Myiarchus crinitus).Google Scholar
McAtee, W. L. 1929. Further notes on insect inhabitants of bird houses. Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 31 (6): 105–111 (three spp. from nest of Sturnus vulgaris).Google Scholar
Macquart, J. 1835. Histoire naturelle des insectes Diptères. Suites à Buffon 2, 710 pp.Google Scholar
Macquart, J. 1843. Diptères exotiques ou peu connus, 2 (constantina and chilensis, spp.n.).Google Scholar
Macquart, J. 1858. Diptères exotiques. Supplément 4, 364 pp. (subnitida, n.sp.).Google Scholar
Malloch, J. R. 1910. Two new species of Anthomyidae, in the genus Fannia R.D. (=Homalomyia Bouché). Ent. Monthly Mag. 46: 67–68 (nigra and femorata, spp.n.).Google Scholar
Malloch, J. R. 1912a. The British species of the dipterous genus Fannia R. D. Ann. Scott. Nat. Hist. 1912: 133–139, 156–161, 175–181, 201–208, 233–234 (keys to and notes on 29 spp.).Google Scholar
Malloch, J. R. 1912b. One new genus and eight new species of dipterous insects in the U.S.N.M. collection. Proc. U.S.N.M. 43: 649–658 (Steinomyia steint, n.gen. n.sp.).Google Scholar
Malloch, J. R. 1913a. Notes on some American Diptera of the genus Fannia, with descriptions of new species. Proc. U.S.N.M. 44: 621–631 (key to species with tripunctate abdomens, five n.spp., notes on 13 others).Google Scholar
Malloch, J. R. 1913b. Two new species of Diptera in the United States National Museum collection. Proc. U S.N.M. 44: 461–463 (tibialis, n.sp.).Google Scholar
Malloch, J. R. 1914. Notes on North American Diptera, with descriptions of new species in the collection of the Illinois State Laboratory of Natural History. Bull. Illinois St. Lab. Nat. Hist. 10: 213–243 (latifrons, n.sp.).Google Scholar
Malloch, J. R. 1918. Diptera from the southwestern United States. No. 4, Anthomyidae. Trans. Am. Ent. Soc. 44: 263–319 (three n.spp., notes on six others).Google Scholar
Malloch, J. R. 1920. Descriptions of new North American Anthomyidae (Diptera). Trans. Am. Ent. Soc. 46: 133–196 (lasiops, n.sp.).Google Scholar
Malloch, J. R. 1923. Notes on Australian Diptera with descriptions. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales 48: 601–622 (australis, n.sp., note on canicularis).Google Scholar
Malloch, J. R. 1924a. Exotic Muscaridae (Diptera) XII. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (9) 13: 409–424 (key to males of 40 Nearctic spp. of Fannia, four n.spp. described).Google Scholar
Malloch, J. R. 1924b. Exotic Muscaridae (Diptera) XIV. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (9) 14: 513–522 (key to females of 28 Nearctic spp. of Fannia).Google Scholar
Malloch, J. R. 1924c. Notes on Australian Diptera, No. 2. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales 49: 138–146 (not seen) (note on Euryomma).Google Scholar
Malloch, J. R. 1927a. A new species of the genus Fannia R.D. from North America (Diptera, Anthomyidae). Ent. News 38: 176 (americana, n.sp.).Google Scholar
Malloch, J. R. 1927b. Descriptions of a new genus and three new species of Diptera. Proc. Ent. Soc. Washington 29: 90–93 (nidicola, n.sp.).Google Scholar
Malloch, J. R. 1930. The calypterate Diptera of New Zealand. Part 1–4. Rec. Canterbury Mus. 3: 289–331 (not seen).Google Scholar
Malloch, J. R. 1934. Diptera of Patagonia and South Chile 7: 171–346. (key, punctiventris, n.sp., notes on 12 others, with synonymy).Google Scholar
Meade, R. H. 1878. Notes on the Anthomyiidae of North America. Ent. Monthly Mag. 14: 250–252 (five spp. recorded).Google Scholar
Meade, R. H. 1882. Annotated list of British Anthomyiidae. Ent. Monthly Mag. 18: 1–5, 27–28, 62–65, 101–104, 123–126, 172–176, 201–205, 221–224, 265–270.Google Scholar
Meade, R. H. 1887. Supplement to annotated list of British Anthomyiidae. Ent. Monthly Mag. 23: 179–181, 250–252, etc.Google Scholar
Meade, R. H. 1891. Additions to the list of British Anthomyiidae. Ent. Monthly Mag. (2) 2: 42–43 (vesparia, n.sp.).Google Scholar
Meade, R. H. 1897. Descriptive list of British Anthomyiidae, London, 79 pp.Google Scholar
Meigen, J. W. 1817. In Wiedemann. Zool. Mag. 1: 82 (not seen).Google Scholar
Meigen, J. W. 1826. Systematische Beschriebung der bekannten europäischen zweiflugligen Insecten 5, vii + 412 pp.Google Scholar
Meijere, J. C. H. de. 1909. Die Dipteren der arktischen Inseln. Fauna Arctica 5, Lief. 1: 13–72.Google Scholar
Meijere, J. C. H. de. 1946. Zevende Supplement op de Nieuve Naamlyst van Neder landsche Diptera van 1898. Tijdschr. Ent. 87: 1–25 (records canicularis).Google Scholar
Mellor, J. E. M. 1920. Observations on the habits of certain flies, especially of those breeding in manure. Ann. Appl. Biol. 6: 53–88 (notes on manicata, scalaris, and canicularis).Google Scholar
Mercier, L. 1922. Diptères de la côte du Calvados, IIIème liste. Ann. Soc. Ent. Belg. 62: 5–10 (scalaris and glaucescens records).Google Scholar
Mik, J. 1898. Dipterologische Miscellän, 2 Serie (XI). Wien. Ent. Ztg. 17: 167–172 (three spp. on plants).Google Scholar
Miller, D. 1922. Sheep maggot flies—Observations in the past season. New Zealand journ. Agrie. 24: 335–336 (canicularis in wool).Google Scholar
Mokrzecki, S. 1923. Über den Parasitismus von Fliegen (Diptera) in Körper von LandSchnecken. Zeitschr. Wiss. Ins. Biol. 18: 135–137 (scalaris and canicularis recorded).Google Scholar
Natvig, L. R. 1932. Om myiasis samt to nye norske kasus. Norsk. Ent. Tijdskr. 3: 117–122 (scalaris and canicularis).Google Scholar
Nelson, R. H. 1938. Observations on Diptera breeding in tomatoes. Journ. Econ. Ent. 31: 128–129 (canicularis record).Google Scholar
Niblett, M. 1955. Nine species of Diptera bred from fungi. Ent. Monthly Mag. 91, xxxix (canicularis and difficilis reared).Google Scholar
Nielsen, P., Ringdahl, O., and Tuxen, S. L.. 1954. The zoology of Iceland 3 (48a) Diptera 1, 189 pp. (notes on six spp.).Google Scholar
Nieshulz, Otto von. 1935a. Über die Temperaturabhängigkeit der Aktivität und die Vorzugstemperatur von Musca domestica und Fannia canicularis. Zool. Anz. 110: 225–233.Google Scholar
Nieshulz, Otto von. 1935b. Über zwei Trypanosoma-ähnliche Flagellaten aus Fannia canicularis. Archiv. Protist. 85: 416–420, 23 Figs.Google Scholar
Nocedo, C. 1918. Dipteros nuevos parasitos de la langosta (Schistocerca peregrina). Rev. Agric. Mexico 2: 132 (R.A.E.B. 9: 587, canicularis as parasite).Google Scholar
Nordberg, B. 1936. Biologischoekologische Untersuchungen über die Vogelnidicolen. Acta Zool. Fenn. 21: 1–168 (canicularis from nests of seven spp. of birds).Google Scholar
Ogden, L. J., and Kilpatrick, J. W.. 1958. Control of Fannia canicularis (L.) in dairy barns, journ. Econ. Ent. 51: 611–612 (data on abundance).Google Scholar
Onorato, R. 1922. Le miasi in Tripolitania. Arch. Ital. Scienze Med. Colon III, nos. 1–12 (R.A.E.B. 11: 77; canicularis).Google Scholar
Örösi-Pál, Z. 1939. Méhellenségek és a köpii állatvilága. Budapest (not seen).Google Scholar
, Ouchi, 1938. Diptera Sinica. Journ. Shanghai Sci. Inst. (3)4: 1–14, 19–22, 33–61 (note on leucosticta).Google Scholar
Pandellé, L. 1899. Études sur les Muscides de France, IIIème partie. Rev. Ent. France, 18 Musc, pp. 1–303 (externa, n.sp., keys and notes on genus and 31 spp.).Google Scholar
Parmenter, L. 1951. Flies taken in a light trap. Ent. Monthly Mag. 87: 249–250 (scalaris and manicata).Google Scholar
Patton, W. S. 1921. Studies on the flagellates of the genera Herpetomonas, Crithidia and Rhynchoidomonas, No. 7, Some miscellaneous notes on insect flagellates. Ind. Journ. Med. Res. 9: 230–239 (canicularis infected).Google Scholar
Peus, F. 1936. Fliegenmaden in Tafelsen f. Zeitschr. Hyg. Zool. 28(9): 141 (R.A.E.A. 25: 539, scalaris in manufactured mustard).Google Scholar
Place, F. R. 1916. The flies that defile. The Register, Adelaide 81 nos. 21, 39, p. 6 (R.A.E.B. 5: 49, scalaris common, notes).Google Scholar
Pokorny, E. 1889. Beitrag zur Dipterenfauna Tirols. Verh. Zool.-bot. Ges. Wien 39: 543–574 (marginata, n.sp., notes on three others).Google Scholar
Portschinsky, J. A. 1913. The domestic fly (Muscina stabulans Fall.); its importance to man and his household and its relation with the house fly (Musca domestica). Trudy Bjuro po Ent. 10 (1): 39. (R.A.E.B, 1: 108–110, canicularis).Google Scholar
Portschinsky, J. A. 1920. Recherches biologiques sur le Stomoxys calcitrans L. et biologie comparée des mouches coprophages. Trudy Bjuro po Ent. 88: 1–63 and 1–90 (not seen).Google Scholar
Ratzeburg, J. T. 1844. Die Forst-Insecten 3. Die Ader Zwei-, Halb-, und Geradflugen, 314 pp. (not seen).Google Scholar
Reed, H. B. Jr,. 1958. A study of dog carcass communities in Tennessee, with special reference to the insects. Amer. Midland Nat. 59 (1): 213–245 (8 spp. recorded).Google Scholar
Regnier, P. R. 1931. Les invasions d'acridiens au Maroc de 1927 à 1931. Dir. Gén. Agrie. Comm. Colonis. Defense des Cultures no. 3, v + 139 pp. (R.A.E.B. 20: 71, canicularis ex locusts).Google Scholar
Richardson, C. H. 1916. Attraction of Diptera to Ammonia. Ann. Ent. Soc. America 9: 408–413 (canicularis caught).Google Scholar
Riedel, M. P. 1918. Int. Ent. Zeit. Guben 12: 166 (not seen).Google Scholar
Riedel, M. P. 1930. Die subalpine Fliegenfauna von Reinerz. Zeitschr. Wiss. Ins. Biol. 25: 71–81 (eight spp. recorded).Google Scholar
Riley, C. V. 1893. Report of the Entomologist for 1892; from the Rept. Secretary Agr. 1892 (Galerucella colony destroyed by Fannia spp.).Google Scholar
Ringdahl, O. 1912. Bidrag till kännedomen om våra anthomyiden. Ent. Tidskr. 33: 208–214 (19 spp. recorded).Google Scholar
Ringdahl, O. 1914. Bidrag till kännedomen om våra anthomyiden. Ent. Tidskr. 35: 142–153 (12 spp. recorded).Google Scholar
Ringdahl, O. 1918. Neue nordische Anthomyiden. Ent. Tidskr. 39: 148–194 (halterata, n.sp.).Google Scholar
Ringdahl, O. 1921. Bidrag till kännedomen om de skanska stranddynernas Insektenfauna. Ent. Tidskr. 42: 21–40 (glaucescens note).Google Scholar
Ringdahl, O. 1926. Neue nordische Museiden nebst Berichtigung und Namensänderungen. Ent. Tidskr. 47: 101–118 (three new spp.).Google Scholar
Ringdahl, O. 1928. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Anthomyidenfauna des Nordlichen Norwegens. Tromsø Mus. Årsh. 49: 1–60.Google Scholar
Ringdahl, O. 1930. Entomologische Ergebnisse der swedischen Kamtshatka-Expedition 1920–22. Ark. Zool. 21A: 1–16 (four spp. recorded).Google Scholar
Ringdahl, O. 1932. Einige neue Musciden aus Schweden. Ent. Tidskr. 52: 156–160 (Fanniosoma latifrons, n.gen., n.sp.).Google Scholar
Ringdahl, O. 1934a. Översikt av svenska fannia-arter (Muscidae). Ent. Tidskr. 55: 105–121 (key to genera and species (50)).Google Scholar
Ringdahl, O. 1934b. Einige neue Museiden. Konowia 13: 97–100 (four new spp.).Google Scholar
Ringdahl, O. 1939. Diptera der Familie Muscidae (die Gattungen Aricia und Anthomyza) von Zetterstedt in “Insecta Lapponica” und “Diptera Scandinaviae” beschrieben. Opuse. Ent. 4: 137–159.Google Scholar
Ringdahl, O. 1944a. Contributions to the knowledge of the Tachinids and Muscids of Norway. Tromsø Mus Årsh. 65 (4), 27 pp. (13 spp. recorded).Google Scholar
Ringdahl, O. 1944b. Revision av Vilhelm Storms Diptersamling 2. Familjen Muscidae. Kongl. Norske Vidensk. Selsk. Forh. 17: 82–85.Google Scholar
Ringdahl, O. 1945. Fannia aequilineata n.sp. Opuse. Ent. 10: 145–146 (note on several other spp.)Google Scholar
Ringdahl, O. 1948. Zwei neue Musciden. Opuse. Ent. 13: 100 (hirundinis, n.sp.).Google Scholar
Ringdahl, O. 1950a. Blombesök av flugor på Solidago virgaurea (Dipt.). Opuse. Ent. 15: 52 (polychaeta and ciliata listed).Google Scholar
Ringdahl, O. 1950b. Dipterologiska antekningar från sydsvenska mossor. Ent. Tidskr. 71: 111–119 (three spp. recorded).Google Scholar
Ringdahl, O. 1951. Flugor från Lapplands, Jämtlands och Härjedalenes fjälltrakten (Diptera, Brachycera). Opusc. Ent. 16: 113–186 (26 spp. recorded).Google Scholar
Ringdahl, O. 1952. Catalogus Insectorum Sueciae XI. Diptera Cyclorhapha: Muscaria Schizometopa. Opuse. Ent. 17: 129–186.Google Scholar
Ringdahl, O. 1954a. Svensk. Insektenfauna 11. Tvavingar. Diptera I. Fam. Muscidae. Hafte 1 (Stockholm) 91 pp.Google Scholar
Ringdahl, O. 1954b. Nya fyndorten för norska Diptera. Norsk. Ent. Tidskr. 9 (1953): 46–54 (three spp. recorded).Google Scholar
Robineau-Desvoidy, A. J. B. 1930. Essai sur les Myodaires 2: 1–813.Google Scholar
Rondani, C. 1866. Anthomyinae Italicae. Att. Soc. Ital. Sci. Nat. 9: 68–217.Google Scholar
Rondani, C. 1870. Diptera Italica, Fase. IV. Addenda Anthomyinis Prodr. 6. Boll. Soc. Ent. 2: 257.Google Scholar
Rondani, C. 1877. Species Italicae ordinis dipterorum. Pars Quinta. Stirps XVII. Anthomyinae. Dipt. Ital. Prodromus 6: 1–309 (Piezura, n.gen., key to 16 Italian spp.).Google Scholar
Roser, C. F. L. von. 1840. Verzeichniss der in Wurtemberg vorkommenden Käfer. Corresp.-bl. Landw. Var. Wurtemb. 1: 59 (not seen).Google Scholar
Roubaud, E. 1927. Sur l'hibernation des quelques mouches communes. Bull. Soc. Ent. France (1927), pp. 24–25 (canicularis).Google Scholar
Sack, P. 1923. Dipteren aus Nowaja Semlja. Rep. Sci. Res. Norv. Exp. N. Zemlya 1 (15), 10 pp. (canicularis record).Google Scholar
St. Germaine, J. 1956a. Flies of public health interest in Santa Clara Co. IV and V. Calif. Vector Views 2: 39, 54 (canicularis from manures).Google Scholar
St. Germaine, J. 1956b. Same title as above VI. Calif. Vector Views 3: 1.Google Scholar
Schiner, J. R. 1862. Fauna Austriaca. Die Fliegen, 1, 674 pp. (key to nine spp., notes on other spp.).Google Scholar
, Schlegtendal. 1934. Zeitschr. Vergl. Phys. 20 (not seen).Google Scholar
Schnabl, J. 1911. Dipterologische Sammelreise nach Korsica (Dipt.) I. (Anthomyidae). Deutsche Akad. Naturf., 95 pp. (notes on genera; genitalic figures).Google Scholar
Schnabl, J., and Dziedzicki, H.. 1911. Die Anthomyiden. Nova Acta Abh. Leop.-Carol. Deutsche Akad. Naturf., 95 pp. (notes on genera; genitalic figures).Google Scholar
Schrank, F. 1781. Enumerano Insectorum Austriae indigenorum, ix + 548 pp. (canicularis).Google Scholar
Scopoli, J. A. 1763. Entomologia Carniolica, 420 pp. (prostrata, n.sp.).Google Scholar
Seago, J. M. 1953. A new species of Fannia from North America (Diptera, Muscidae). journ. Kansas Ent. Soc. 26: 141–142 (enotahensis, n.sp.).Google Scholar
Seago, J. M. 1954. The pusio group of the genus Fannia R.D., with descriptions of new species. Am. Mus. Novitates No. 1699, 13 pp. (key to nine spp., three n.spp.).Google Scholar
Séguy, E. 1923. Diptères Anthomyides. Faune de France 6. Paris xi + 393 pp.Google Scholar
Séguy, E. 1924. Les insectes parasites de l'homme et des animaux domestiques. Paris (general compilation) (not seen).Google Scholar
Séguy, E. 1925. Études sur les anthomyides, 1er note. Ene. Ent. B.2, Diptera 1: 135–136 (biology of scalaris, canicularis and incisurata).Google Scholar
Séguy, E. 1929. Diptères parasites des oiseaux. Enc. Ent. B.2, Diptera 5: 71 (notes on five spp.).Google Scholar
Séguy, E. 1930. Contribution a l'étude des diptères du Maroc. Mem. Soc. Sci. Nat. Maroc 24, 206 pp. (notes on three spp.).Google Scholar
Séguy, E. 1932. Diptères parasites des sauterelles. Enc. Ent. B.2, Diptera 6: 11–40 (canicularis records).Google Scholar
Séguy, E. 1937. Diptera. Fam. Muscidae. Genera Insectorum, Fase. 205, Brussels, 604 pp.Google Scholar
Séguy, E. 1941a. Diptères recueillis par M. L. Berland dans le sud marocain. Ann. Soc. Ent. France 105: 1–23 (canicularis common).Google Scholar
Séguy, E. 1941b. Une nouvelle espèce d'Euryomma Stein (Diptera, Muscidae) et synopsis des espèces du genre. Bull. Soc. Ent. France 46: 54–55 (key to spp. of Euryomma).Google Scholar
Séguy, E. 1945. VI. Diptères. Mem. Mus. Nat. d'Hist. Nat. Paris 19: 151–155 (description of leucosticta larva, key to five spp. (larvae)).Google Scholar
Séguy, E. 1953. Diptères du Maroc. Enc. Ent. B.2, Diptera 11: 79–92.Google Scholar
Service, R. 1898. Homalomyia scalaris feeding on wax. Ann. Scott. Nat. Hist., p. 241.Google Scholar
Shannon, R. C., and Del Ponte, E.. 1926. Sinopsis parcial de los muscoideos argentinos. Rev. Inst. Bact. Buenos Aires 4: 549–590 (key to genera and spp., three n.spp., notes on two others).Google Scholar
Shannon, R. C., and Del Ponte, E.. 1927. Sinopsis parcial de los muscoideos argentinos (addenda et corrigenda). Rev. Inst. Bact. Buenos Aires 5: 141–147 (corrections and revised key).Google Scholar
Shillito, J. F. 1947. Notes on insects visiting diseased elms. Ent. Monthly Mag. 83: 290–292 (canicularis note).Google Scholar
Shinoda, O., and Ando, I.. 1935. Diurnal rhythm of flies (in Japanese). Bot. and Zool. 3 (1): 117–121 (notes on canicularis).Google Scholar
Smith, A. C. 1954a. Flies, chickens and people. Calif. Vector Views 1 (6): 1 (canicularis in chicken house).Google Scholar
Smith, A. C. 1954b. Common flies of public health importance associated with raising chickens. Calif. Vector Views 1 (6): 2 (canicularis).Google Scholar
Smith, A. C. 1958. High protein food waste as a source of lesser house fly. Calif. Vector Views 5 (9): 63 (canicularis).Google Scholar
Smith, J. B. 1890. Catalogue of Insects found in New Jersey. Trenton, 486 pp. (list of four spp.).Google Scholar
Smith, J. B. 1900. Insects of New Jersey. Trenton, 755 pp. (Diptera determined by C. W. Johnson—notes on three spp. including fasciculata).Google Scholar
Smith, K. G. V. 1952. On some Diptera from Dublin and Wicklow with notes on several species new to Ireland. Ent. Monthly Mag. 88: 104–106 (aerea record).Google Scholar
Sömme, L. 1958. The number of stable flies in Norwegian barns, and their resistance to DDT. Journ. Econ. Ent. 51: 599–601 (Fannia spp. common).Google Scholar
Stem, P. 1892a. Drie neue merkwürdige Homalomyia-arten. Wien. Ent. Ztg. 11: 69–77 (hirticeps and latipalpis, n.spp.).Google Scholar
Stein, P. 1892b. Die Anthomyiden der Fallén-Zetterstedt'chen Sammlung. (Study of anthomyiid types in Fallén-Zetterstedt collection at Lund). Ent. Nachr. 18: 321–333.Google Scholar
Stein, P. 1895. Die Anthomyidengruppe Homalomyia nebst ihren Gattungen und Arten. Berl. Ent. Zeitsch. 40: 1–141 (key to genera and spp., descriptions and synonymy of 46 spp.–16 n.spp. and Choristomma, n.gen.).Google Scholar
Stein, P. 1897. Nordamerikanische Anthomyiden (Beitrag zur Dipteren fauna der Vereinigten Staaten). Berl. Ent. Zeitsch. 42: 161–288 (key, 17 spp. described, seven n.spp.).Google Scholar
Stein, P. 1899. Euryomma, eine neue Gattung der Anthomyidengruppe Homalomyta. Ent. Nachr. 25: 19–22 (Euryomma hispaniense, n.gen., n.sp.).Google Scholar
Stein, P. 1900. Die Tachininen und Anthomyiden der Meigen'schen Sammlung in Paris. Ent. Nachr. 26: 129–157.Google Scholar
Stein, P. 1901. Die Walker'schen aussereuropäischen Anthomyiden in der Sammlung des British Museum zur London (Diptera). Zeitschr. Hym. Dipt. 1: 185–221.Google Scholar
Stein, P. 1902 In Becker, Aegyptische Dipteren. Mitt. Zool. Mus. Beri. 2: 121–173.Google Scholar
Stein, P. 1904. Die Americanischen Anthomyiden. Ann. Mus. Nat. Hung. 2: 414–495 (notes on 11 spp., key).Google Scholar
Stein, P. 1907a. In Bezzi and Stein, Katalog der Palaearktischen Dipteren 3: 637 pp.Google Scholar
Stein, P. 1907b. Revision der Bigot'schen und einigen von Macquart beschriebenen aussereuropäischen Anthomyiden (Diptera). Zeitschr. Hym. Dipt. 7: 273–293.Google Scholar
Stein, P. 1907c. Zur Kenntnis der Dipteren von Ventral-Asien. II. Cyclorrhapha Schizophora Schizometopa. Ann. Mus. Zool. Acad. Imp. Sci. St. Petersbourg 12: 318–372 (Xestomyia, n.gen.; F. glaucescens recorded).Google Scholar
Stein, P. 1908a. In Becker, Dipteren der Kanarischen Inseln. Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin 4: 1–180 (five spp. recorded; pubescens, n.sp.).Google Scholar
Stein, P. 1908b. In Becker, Dipteren der Insel Madiera. Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin 4: 181–206 (four spp. recorded).Google Scholar
Stein, P. 1908c. Analytische Uebersicht aller mir bekannten breitstirnigen Anthomyiden-Mannchen. Wien. Ent. Ztg. 27: 1–15 (E. peregrinum).Google Scholar
Stein, P. 1909. Neue Javanische Anthomyiden. Tijd. Ent. 102: 205–271 (leucosticta recorded).Google Scholar
Stein, P. 1910a. Indo-Australische Anthomyiden des Budapesten Museums. Ann. Mus. Nat. Hung. 8: 545–570 (canicularis).Google Scholar
Stein, P. 1910b. The Percy Sladen Trust Expedition to the Indian Ocean in 1905. Anthomyiidae mit den Gattungen Rhinia and Idriella. Trans. Linn. Soc. London Zool. 14: 149 (notseen).Google Scholar
Stein, P. 1910c. Die von Thomson beschriebenen Anthomyiden der Eugenia Resa. Wien. Ent Ztg. 29: 66–78 (ochrogaster and brevipalpis discussed).Google Scholar
Stein, P. 1913a. Versuch die Gattungen und Arten unserer Anthomyiden.…Archiv jür Naturg. 79A, H.8: 4–55 (key to females of Fanniinae).Google Scholar
Stein, P. 1913b. Neue Afrikanische Anthomyiden. Ann. Mus. Nat. Hung. 11: 457–583 (canicularis and others).Google Scholar
Stein, P. 1915a. H. Sauter's Formosa-Ausbeute. Anthomyidae (Diptera). Supplementa Entomologica 4: 13–28 (leucosticta, carbonaria, peregrinum).Google Scholar
Stein, P. 1915b. Fauna Faeröensis VI. Dipteren 4: Anthomyiinae. Zoologische Jahrbucher Syst. 39: 135–140 (five spp. listed).Google Scholar
Stein, P. 1916. Die Anthomyiden Europas. Archiv für Naturg. 81A, 10: 1–224 (key and notes on 38 spp., one n.sp.).Google Scholar
Stein, P. 1918. Zur weitern Kenntnis aussereuropäischer Anthomyiden. Ann. Mus. Nat. Hung 16: 147–244 (notes on 13 spp. from various regions, four n.spp.).Google Scholar
Stein, P. 1919a. Die Anthomyidengattungen der Welt. Archiv für Naturg. 83A, 1: 85–178.Google Scholar
Stein, P. 1919b. Anthomyiden aus Java, Sumatra, Waigeoe und Ceram. Tijd. Ent. 62: 47–86 (leucosticta recorded).Google Scholar
Stein, P. 1920. Nordamerikanische Anthomyiden. 2. Beitrag. Archiv für Naturg. 84A, 9: 1–106 (notes on 18 spp., three n.spp.).Google Scholar
Strobl, P. G. 1893. Die Anthomyinen Steiermarks (Mit Berücksichtigung der Nachbarländer). Verh, Zool.-bot. Ges. Wien 43: 213–276 (notes on 18 spp., one new sp.).Google Scholar
Strobl, P. G. 1894. Anmerkungen zur Herrn E. Pokorny's Aufsatz. Wien. Ent. Zeit. 13: 65–76 (Platycoenosia mikii, n.gen., n.sp.).Google Scholar
Strobl, P. G. 1896. Glasnik zen. Mus. Bosn. Hercegov. 10 (not seen) (H. bosnica, n.sp.).Google Scholar
Strobl, P. G. 1900. Dipterenfauna von Bosnien, Hercegovina und Dalmatia. Wiss. Mitt. Bosn. Hercegov. 7: 552–670 (not seen) (Gymnochoristomma, n.gen.).Google Scholar
Strobl, P. G. 1906. Spanische Dipteren II. Beitrag Mem. Soc. Espan. Hist. Nat. 3: 271–422.Google Scholar
Strobl, P. G. 1909. Spanische Dipteren III. Verb. Zool.-bot. Ges. Wien 59: 121–301 (six spp. reported).Google Scholar
Strobl, P. G. 1910. Die Dipteren von Steiermark II. Mitt. Naturwiss. Verb. Steiermark 46: 45–293.Google Scholar
Sytschevskaja, V. I. 1957, Flies of medical importance in N. Kirghisia (in Russian). Rev. Ent. U.S.S.R. 36: 108–115 (canicularis, leucosticta, incisurata and scalaris).Google Scholar
Thomsen, M. 1938. Stuefluen (Musca domestica) og Stikfluen (Stomoxys calcitrans). Ber. Kgl. Vet. og Landbohøjsk, Forsøgslab 176: 1–352.Google Scholar
Thomsen, M., and Hammer, O.. 1936. The breeding media of some common flies. Bull. Ent. Res. 27: 559–587 (biological notes on canicularis and scalaris).Google Scholar
Thomson, C. G. 1868. Konliga Svenska Fregatten Eugenia Resa. Omring Jorden. Diptera. Stockholm: 443–614 (ochrogaster and brevipalpis, n.spp.).Google Scholar
Thornley, A. 1931. Notes on some Cornish Diptera. Ent. Monthly Mag. 67: 90–92 (records several spp.).Google Scholar
Tiensuu, L. 1935. Die bisher aus Finland bekannten Museiden. Acta Soc. Fauna Flora Fenn. 59 (4): 1–56.Google Scholar
Tiensuu, L. 1936. Insect life on plants attacked by aphids. Ann. Ent. Fenn. 2: 161–169 (12 spp. recorded).Google Scholar
Tiensuu, L. 1938. Beiträge zur Kenntnis den Museiden (Dipt.) Finlands. Ann. Ent. Fenn. 4: 21–33 (notes on four spp.; one new var.; Ivalomyia limbata, n.gen., n.sp.).Google Scholar
Tiensuu, L. 1939. Beiträge zur Kenntnis den Musciden (Dipt.) Finlands. Ann. Ent. Fenn. 5: 241–255 (note on coracina).Google Scholar
Tiensuu, L. 1940. Für die Fauna Finlands neue Museiden (Dipt.). Ann. Ent. Fenn. 6: 154–157 (notes on four spp.).Google Scholar
Tiensuu, L. 1946a. Beiträge zur Muscidenfauna Nordeuropas. Ann. Ent. Fenn. 12: 63–68 (notes on leucosticta, barbata).Google Scholar
Tiensuu, L. 1946b. Zur Fliegeneinwohnerschaft eines Ameisennestes. Ann. Ent. Fenn. 12: 73–74 (latifrons ex nest of Lasius sp.).Google Scholar
Tilden, J. W. 1957. Flies from major sources. Calif. Vector Views 4: 24, 26 (canicularis, femoralis, scalaris).Google Scholar
Tilden, J. W., and Germaine, J. St.. 1956. Flies of public health interest in Santa Clara Co. Calif. Vector Views 2: 12 (canicularis).Google Scholar
Timon-David, J. 1937. Recherches sur le peuplement des hautes montagnes. Diptères de la vallée de Chamonix et du massif du Mont Blanc. Ann. Fac. Sci. Marseille (2) 10: 3–51 (not seen).Google Scholar
van der Wulp, F. M. 1896. Biologia Centrali Americana. Dipt. 2. London, 416 pp. (note on canicularis and mexicana).Google Scholar
van Emden, F. I. 1948. Diptera: Muscidae. Exped. S. W. Arabia 1937–38. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) 1: 161–175 (not seen).Google Scholar
Vanskaya, R. A. 1942. The use of ammonium carbonate for the control of Musca domestica (in Russian). Med. Parasit. 10: 562–567 (R.A.E.B. 31: 225).Google Scholar
Verrall, G. H. 1901. A list of British Diptera. 2nd edition, 47 pp. (Homalomyinae with four genera).Google Scholar
Villeneuve, J. 1910. Études diptèrologiques. 1. Sur Gymnochoristomma bosnica Strobl. Wien. Ent. Zeit. 29: 79–81 (note on teratology).Google Scholar
Vitzhum, H. G. 1927. Eine Notiz über Parasitus vesparum Oudemans 1905 und Fannia scalaris Fab. 1794. Zeitschr. Wiss. Ins. Biol. 22: 46–48 (scalaris in hornet's nest serving as alternate host for deutonymph).Google Scholar
Vos-de Wilde, B. de. 1935. Contribution à l'étude des Diptera Cyclorrhapha. Amsterdam, 125 pp. (scalaris, fuscula—larvae described).Google Scholar
Wahlberg, P. F. 1852. Lappska Insekten nedstigande till Wermland. Ofv. K. Vet. Akad. Forhandl. 9: 183–187 (not seen).Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1849. List of Diptera in the British Museum 4: 688–1172 (three n.spp.-Bigot's system of groups).Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1853. Insecta Britannica. Diptera. London, 3, 352 pp. (elapsa, n.sp.).Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1856. Insecta Saundersiana. Diptera, pp. 350–370 (communis and introducta, n.spp.).Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1871. List of Diptera collected in Egypt and Arabia by J. K. Lord, Esq. with descriptions of the species new to science. Entomologist 5: 339–346 (muscoides, n.sp.).Google Scholar
Walsh, B. D. 1869. Larvae in the human body. American Entomologist 2: 137 (three n.spp. based on larvae).Google Scholar
Wiedemann, C. R. W. 1830. Aussereuropäische zweiflügelige Insekten 2, 608 pp. (pusio, n.sp.).Google Scholar
Wilhelmi, J. 1919. Zur Biologie der kleinen Stubenfliege Fannia canicularis L. Zeitschr. Angew. Ent. 5: 261–266.Google Scholar
Wilhelmi, J. 1920. Zur Überwinterung von Museiden. Zeitschr. Angew. Ent. 6: 296–301 (canicularis and scalaris).Google Scholar
Wingate, W. J. 1906. Durham Diptera, 419 pp. (notes on genera-Stein's key translated—nine spp. recorded).Google Scholar
Wright, A. E. 1940. Late Syrphidae in a North Lancashire garden. Ent. Monthly Mag. 76: 54–55 (note on three spp.).Google Scholar
Zangheri, P. 1950. Fauna di Romagna. Dittera 2a parte. Mem. Soc. Ent. Ital. 29: 68–95 (not scen).Google Scholar
Zetterstedt, J. W. 1838. Insecta Lapponica descripta. Lipsiae (Voss) Diptera, vi + 1139 pp.Google Scholar
Zetterstedt, J. W. 1845. Diptera Scandinavia disposita et descripta 4: 1281–1738. Lund (four n.spp., notes on 10 others).Google Scholar