Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T13:41:45.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REVISION OF THE GENUS HYDROCHARA BERTH. (COLEOPTERA: HYDROPHILIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Aleš Smetana
Get access

Abstract

A revision of the hydrophilid genus Hydrochara Berth. (Coleoptera) is presented including a historical review, a discussion of diagnostic characters and techniques, and a discussion of the phylogeny and zoogeography of this genus.Twenty-one species are recognized. Six species are described as new. H. grandis (Zimm.) is listed as species dubia. H. scrobiculata (Panzer, 1799), H. substriata (Sturm, 1843), H. intermedia (Mulsant, 1844), H. subaenea (Motschulsky, 1845), H. smaragdina (Bach, 1856), H. costata (Lüderwaldt, 1897), H. flaviventris (Ochs, 1923), and H. carinata (Jander, 1927) are placed in synonymy with H. caraboides (Linné, 1758); H. roubali (Vávra, 1923) with H. flavipes (Stev.); H. uniformis (Fairmaire, 1869) with H. elliptica (Fabricius, 1801).Neotype is designated for H. obtusata (Say). Lectotypes are designated for H. dichroma (Fairm.), H. sarta (Sem.), H. libera (Sharp), H. semenovi (Zaits.), H. profanifuga (Sem.), H. affinis (Sharp), H. uniformis (Fairm.), H. fulvofemorata (Fairm.), and H. glauca (LeC.).Key to species is provided, each species is described and illustrated, and all available bionomic and distributional data are presented; distributional records are mapped.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada , Volume 112 , Supplement S111 , 1980 , pp. 1 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acloque, A. 1896. Faune de France … Coléoptères. Paris. 466 pp.Google Scholar
Arnett, R.H. Jr., 1960 (1968). The beetles of the united States (a manual for identification). Washington, D.C., 11 + 1112 pp.; 2nd printing, Ann Arbor, 12 + 1112 pp.Google Scholar
Arnett, R.H. Jr., and Samuelson, G.A.. 1969. Directory of Coleoptera colletiions of North America (Canada through Panama). Lafayette. 123 pp.Google Scholar
Bach, M. 1849–1851. Käferfauna für Nord- und Mitteldeutschland, mit besonderer Rücksicht auf die preussischen Rheinlande. Vol. 1. Coblenz. 414 pp.Google Scholar
Bach, M. 1856. Nachträge und Verbesserungen zur Käferfauna von Nord- und Mitteldeutschland. Stettin. ent. Ztg 17: 241–247.Google Scholar
Bach, M. 1866. Systematisches Verzeichniss der Käfer Deutschlands, gehörend zur Käferfauna. Coblenz. 64 pp.Google Scholar
Balfour-Browne, F. 1941. The aquatic Coleoptera of east and west Sussex. Entomologist's mon. Mag. 77: 257–272.Google Scholar
Bach, M. 1958. British Water Beetles. Vol. III. London. LIII + 210 pp.Google Scholar
Balfour-Browne, J. 1950. On the aquatic Coleoptera of Northern Rhodesia (Dytiscidae, Gyrinidae and Palpicornia). Occ. Pap. nat. Mus. S. Rhod. 2(16): 359–399.Google Scholar
Balfour-Browne, J. 1954. A preliminary contribution to the knowledge of the South African Palpicornia (Coleoptera).(Professor J. Omer-Cooper's investigation of the inland waters of Africa.) J. ent. Soc. sth Africa 17: 96–114.Google Scholar
Balfour-Browne, J. 1957. Contribution à l'étude de la faune entomologique du Ruanda-Urundi (Mission P. Basilewsky 1953). CXVIII. Coleoptera Hydrophilidae. Annls Mus. Congo Tervuren (Zool.) 58: 14–25.Google Scholar
Balthasar, V. 1957. Coleoptera. pp. 419–703in Kratochvíl, J. (Ed.), Klíč zvíreny ČSR. Vol. II. Praha.Google Scholar
Balthasar, V. 1963. Monographie der Scarabaeidae und Aphodiidae der palaearktischen und orientalischen Region. Coleoptera: Lamellicornia. Bd. 1. Prag. 391 pp., 24 pl.Google Scholar
Bedel, L.E.M. 1881. Faune des Coléoptères du bassin de la Seine (et de ses bassins secondaires). Vol. I. App. to Annls Soc. ent. Fr. 24. 360 pp.Google Scholar
Bedel, L.E.M. 1892. Synopsis des grands hydrophiles (Genre Stethoxus Solier). Revue Ent. 10: 308–323.Google Scholar
Bergstrasser, J.A.B. 1778. Nomenclatur und Beschreibung der Insecten in der Grafschaft Hanau-Münzenberg … Vol. I. Hanau. 88 pp., 14 pl.Google Scholar
Berthold, A.A. 1827. Latreille's natürliche Familien des Thierreiches. (German translation von Latreille: Familles naturelles … 1825.) Weimar, 8. 602 pp.Google Scholar
Bertrand, H. 1954. Les insectes aquatiques d'Europe. Vol. I. Encyclopédie entomologique. Sér. A, Vol. 30. Paris. 556 pp.Google Scholar
Bertrand, H. 1962. Contribution à l'étude des premiers états des Coléoptères aquatiques de la région éthiopenne (4e note). Famille: Hydrophilidae s. lat. (Palpicornia auct.). Bull. I.F.A.N. 24 (sér. A): 1065–1114.Google Scholar
Bertrand, H. 1967. Clé de détermination des larves des genres d'Hydrophilides holarctiques. Cah. Naturalistes, Bull. (N.P.) 22: 85–88.Google Scholar
Bertrand, H. 1972. Larves et nymphes des coléoptères aquatiques du globe … Paris. 804 pp.Google Scholar
Blanford, W.T. 1890 …. Anniversary address …. Proc. A. Meet. Geol. Soc. Lond. 1890: 13–80.Google Scholar
Blatchley, W.S. 1910. An Illustrated Descriptive Catalogue of the Coleoptera or Beetles (Exclusive of Rhynchophora) Known to Occur in Indiana. Indianapolis. 1386 pp.Google Scholar
Boheman, C.H. 1848–1851. Insecta Caffraria annis 1838–1845 a J.A. Wahlberg collecta. Coleoptera. I, 2. Holmiae. pp. 299–625, 2 pl.Google Scholar
Bose, F.C. 1859. Die Käfer Deutschlands von Valentin Gutfleisch. Darmstadt. 16 + 661 + 3 pp.Google Scholar
Bøving, A.G. and Craighead, F.C.. 1931. An illustrated synopsis of the principal larval forms of the order Coleoptera. Entomologica am. (N.S.) 11: 1–351, 125 pl.Google Scholar
Bøving, A.G. and Henriksen, K.L.. 1939. The developmental stages of the Danish Hydrophilidae (Ins., Coleoptera). Vidensk. Meddr dansk naturh. Foren. 102: 27–162.Google Scholar
Bowditch, F.C. 1884. Hydrocharis obtusatus. J. Bost. zool. Soc. 3: 1–6.Google Scholar
Brullé, A. 1835. Histoire naturelle des Insectes. Vol. 5, Col. II. Paris. 436 pp.Google Scholar
Buisson du, H. 1925. Observations sur le mécanisme de la ventilation trachéenne chez les insectes. Bull. Classe Sci. Acad. r. Belg. 10: 635–656.Google Scholar
Camerano, L. 1883. Monografia degli Idrofilini Italiani. Atti Accad. Sci., Torino 19: 270–287.Google Scholar
Campbell, J.M. Distributional patterns of Coleoptera in Eastern Canada. Can. Ent. (in press).Google Scholar
Cederhjelm, J. 1798. Faunae Ingricae prodromus … Lipsiae, 18. 348 pp. 3 pl.Google Scholar
Chandler, H.P. 1956. (Aquatic Coleoptera, part.) In Usinger, R.L., Aquatic Insects of California. Berkeley. 508 pp.Google Scholar
Kim, Chang - Whan. 1978. Distribution atlas of Insects of Korea. Series 2. Coleoptera. Seoul XV + 414 pp., 38 pl.Google Scholar
Chenu, J.C. 1851. Encyclopédie d'histoire naturelle … Coléoptères. Vol. I. Paris. 312 pp., 28 + 5 pl.Google Scholar
Chiesa, A. 1959. Hydrophilidae Europae — Coleoptera Palpicornia. Bologna. 200 pp., 19 pl.Google Scholar
Crotch, G.R. 1873. Check list of the Coleoptera of America, north of Mexico. Salem, Mass.136 pp.Google Scholar
Curtis, J. 1827. British Entomology. Vol. IV. London. pl. 147–194.Google Scholar
Dahl, A. 1775. Bigae Insectorum. Amoen. acad. 8: 303–309.Google Scholar
Dalla Torre, C.W. 1877. Synopsis der Insecten Oberösterreichs. Jber. Ver. Naturk. Linz 8: 15–74.Google Scholar
Darlington, P.J. jr., 1957. Zoogeography: The geographical distribution of animals. New York. 675 pp.Google Scholar
Deegener, P. 1899. Bau und Stellung der Mundgliedmaassen bei Hydrophilus. (Vorläuf. Mitt.). Sber. Ges. naturf. Freunde Berl.: 44–49.Google Scholar
DeGeer, C. 1774. Mémoires pour servir à l'histoire des Insectes. Vol. IV. Stockholm. 10 + 456 pp.Google Scholar
De Lattin, G. 1967. Grundriss der Zoogeographie. Jena. 602 pp.Google Scholar
De Villers, C.J. 1789. Caroli Linnaei entomologia … Vol. I. Lugduni. 24 + 765 pp. 3 pl.Google Scholar
Dietz, R.S. and Holden, J.C.. 1970. Reconstruction of Pangaea: breakup and dispersion of continents, Permian to present. J. Geophys. Res. 15: 4940–4956.Google Scholar
Dillon, Elisabeth and Dillon, L.S.. 1961. A Manual of Common Beetles of Eastern North America. Evanston & Elmsford. 884 pp.Google Scholar
Dillon, L.S. 1956. Wisconsin climate and life zones in North America. Science 123: 167–176.Google Scholar
Donndorff, J.A. 1799. In Goeze, Europäische Fauna oder Naturgeschichte der europäischen Thiere… Vol. 8. Käfer. Leipzig. 18 + 892 pp.Google Scholar
Dorf, E. 1960. Climatic changes of the past and present. Am. Scient. 48: 341–364.Google Scholar
Duftschmid, C. 1805. Fauna Austriaca… Vol. I. Linz u. Leipzig. 311 pp.Google Scholar
Edwards, J.G. 1950. Amphizoidae (Coleoptera) of the world. Wasmann J. Biol. 8: 303–332.Google Scholar
Endrödy-Younga, S. 1967. Fauna Hungariae 87, VI. köt., 10 fùz. Coleoptera I. Csíboralkatúak — Palpicornia. Budapest. 97 pp.Google Scholar
Erichson, W.F. 1837–1839. Die Käfer der Mark Brandenburg I. Berlin. 740 pp.Google Scholar
Erichson, W.F. 1841. Zur systematischen Kenntnis der Insectenlarven. Erster Beitrag, die Larven der Coleopteren. Arch. Naturgesch. 7: 60–110.Google Scholar
Everts, E.J.G. 1882. (Hydrous caraboides, monstrosity.) Tijdschr. Ent. 25: XVIII.Google Scholar
Everts, E.J.G. 1898. Coloeptera Neerlandica. De schildvleugelige insecten van Nederland en het aangrenzend gebied. Vol. I. 'sGravenhage. 8 + 676 pp.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J.C. 1715. Sysrema Entomologiae… Flensburgi et Lipsiae. 30 + 832 pp.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J.C. 1781. Species Insectorum Vols. I and II. Hamburgi et Kilii, Vol. I: 8 + 552 pp;Google Scholar
Fabricius, J.C. 1781. Species Insectorum Vols. I and II. Hamburgi et Kilii, Vol. II: 517 pp.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J.C. 1787. Mantissa Insectorum … Vol. I. Hafniae. 20 + 348 pp.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J.C. 1792. Entomologia Systematica. I, 2. Hafniae. 538 pp.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J.C. 1801. Systema Eleutheratorum … Bd. I. Kiliae. 24 + 506 pp.Google Scholar
Fairmaire, L. 1869. Notes sur les coléoptères recueillis par Charles Coquerel à Madagascar et sur les côtes d'Afrique. 2e partie. Annls Soc. ent. Fr. (4)9: 179–260.Google Scholar
Fairmaire, L. 1892. Descriptions de coléoptères des environs d'Akbès (Syrie). Annls Soc. ent. Belg. 36: 144–156.Google Scholar
Fairmaire, L. and Laboulbène, A.. 1854–1856. Faune entomologique française, ou description des Insectes qui se trouvent en France. Paris. 35 + 665 pp.Google Scholar
Fall, H.C. 1901. List of the Coleoptera of southern California, with notes on habits and distribution and descriptions of new species. Occ. Pap. Calif. Acad. Sci. 8. 282 pp.Google Scholar
Fourcroy, A.F. 1785. Entomologia parisiensis, sive catalogus Insectorum, quae in agro parisiensi reperiuntur… Vol. 1. Paris. 231 pp.Google Scholar
Fowler, W.W. 1887. The Coleoptera of British Islands. Vol. I. London. 32 + 269 pp.Google Scholar
Franz, H. 1970. Die gegenwärtige Insektenverbreitung und ihre Entstehung. In Franz, H. and Beier, M., Die geographische Verbreitung der Insekten. Hand. d. Zool. IV 2–1/6. Berlin. 139 pp.Google Scholar
Fricken, W. 1870. Die Käfer des Wassers. Natur Offenbar. 16: 470–480, 498–504.Google Scholar
Fukuda, A., Kurosawa, K., and Hayashi, N.. 1959. Coleoptera. In Esaki, et al. , Illustrated Insect Larvae of Japan (in Japanese.). Tokyo. 712 + 73 + 50 pp. (Coleoptera pp. 392–545.)Google Scholar
Canglbauer, L. 1904. Die Käfer von Mittleleuropa. IV. 1. Wien. 286 pp.Google Scholar
Gmelin, J.F. 1790. pp. 1517–2224in Linné, Sysrema naturae… ed. XIII. Vol. 1, Pars 4. Lipsiae.Google Scholar
Goeze, J.A.E. 1777. Entomologische Beiträge zu des Ritter Linné 12. Ausgabe des Natursystems. Vol. I. Leipzig. 16 + 736 pp.Google Scholar
Gordon, R.D. and Post, R.L.. 1965. North Dakota Water Beetles. North Dakota Insects, Publ.5. 53 pp.Google Scholar
Gozis, M.P. des. 1916–1918. Tableaux de détermination des Hydrophilidae de la faune francorhénane. Misc. ent. 23: 1–48; 24: 61–80, 81–92.Google Scholar
Gressit, J.L. 1961. Problems in the zoogeography of Pacific and Antartic Insects. Pacif. Insects Mon. 2. 94 pp.Google Scholar
Griffini, A. 1895 a. Quelques expériences sur la résistance à la submersion chez Hydrous flavipes. Misc. ent. 3: 83–84.Google Scholar
Griffini, A. 1895 b. Notes sur la Faune entomologique piémontaise. V. Sur l'existence de l'Hydrous flavipes Stev. dans le Piemont. Misc. ent. 3: 44–45.Google Scholar
Gyllenhal, L. 1808, 1827. Insecta Suecica. Vol. I, pars 1; Vol. IV. Scaris, Vol. I: 572 pp.; Lipsiae, Vol. IV: 762 pp.Google Scholar
Haase, E. 1884. (Brutpflege der Insekten.) Z. Ent. Breslau (N.F.) 9: XXX–XXXI.Google Scholar
Hansen, V. 1931. Danmarks Fauna. Biller IX. Vandkaerer (Palpicornia: Hydrophilidae). København. pp. 1–101, 158–163.Google Scholar
Harris, M. 1794. The Aurelian or Natural History of English Insects …. Ed. 3. London. 15 + 90 + 4 pp., 46 pl.Google Scholar
Heer, O. 1838–1842. Fauna Coleopterorum Helverica I. Turii, Orelii etc. 12 + 652 pp.Google Scholar
Heilprin, A. 1887. The geographical and geological distribution of animals. New York. XII + 435 pp.Google Scholar
Henneguy, L.F. 1904. Les Insectes. Morphologie. Reproduction. Embryogènie. Paris. 18 + 804 pp., 4 pl.Google Scholar
Henriksen, K.L. 1931. Vandkaer — Larverne. pp. 102–157in Hansen, V., Danmarks Fauna. Biller IX. København.Google Scholar
Herbst, J.F.W. 1797. Natursystem aller bekannten in- und auslandischen Insecten Vol. 7. Berlin. 346 pp., pl. 96–116.Google Scholar
Hochhuth, J.H. 1871. Enumeration der in der russischen Gouvernements Kiew und Volynien bisher aufgefundenen Käfer. Bull. Soc. Imp. natural. Moscou 44(1): 176–253.Google Scholar
Holdhaus, K. 1929. Die geographische Verbreitung der Insekten. pp. 592–1058in Schröder, , Handbuch der Entomologie. Vol. II. Jena.Google Scholar
Hope, F.W. 1838. The Coleopterists Manual … Vol. 2. Predaceous Land and Water Beetles. London. 168 pp., 4 pl.Google Scholar
Horion, A. 1949. Faunistik der mitteleuropäischen Käfer. Bd. II. Frankfurt a. M.388 pp.Google Scholar
Horion, A. 1951. Verzeichnis der Käfer Mitteleuropas. Stuttgart. 536 pp.Google Scholar
Horn, G.H. 1876. Synoptic tables of some genera of Coleoptera, with notes and synonymy. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 5: 246–252.Google Scholar
Horn, G.H. 1895. Coleoptera of Baja California. (Supplement I.) Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. (2)5: 225–259, pl. XX.Google Scholar
Howden, H.F. 1966. Some possible effects of the Pleistocene on the distributions of North American Scarabaeidae (Coleoptera). Can. Ent. 98: 1177–1190.Google Scholar
Illiger, J.C.W. 1798. Verzeichniss der Käfer Preussens … Halle. 41 + 510 pp.Google Scholar
Imhoff, L. 1856. Versuch einer Einführung in das Studium der Coleopteren. Vols. I–II. Basel. 118 + 272 pp., 25 pl.Google Scholar
Jacquelin du Val, P.N.C. 1856–1859. Genera des coléoptères d'Europe … Vol. II. Paris. 288 pp., 67 pl.Google Scholar
Jakobson, G.G. 1905–1915. Zhuki Rosii i zapadnoy Evropy. Petersburg, 11 fasc., 1024 pp., 83 pl. Unfinished.Google Scholar
Jacques, H.E. 1951. How to know the beetles. Dubuque, Iowa. 372 pp.Google Scholar
Jander, M. 1927. Eine neue Abart von Hydrophilus caraboides. Z. ent. Breslau 15: 16–17.Google Scholar
Jeannel, R. 1955. L'édéage. Initiation aux recherches sur la systématique des Coléoptères. Publ. Mus. nat. Hist. Paris 16. 155 pp.Google Scholar
Kempers, K.J.W. 1901. Het adersysteem der kevervleugels. Tijdschr. Ent. 43: 172–199, pl. 10–12.Google Scholar
Kempers, K.J.W. 1923. Abbildungen von Flügelgeäder der Coleopteren. Ent. Mitt. 12: 71–115.Google Scholar
Kendeigh, C.S. 1954. History and evaluation of various concepts of plant and animal communities in North America. Ecology 35: 152–171.Google Scholar
Klausnitzer, B. 1978. Ordnung Coleoptera (Larven). The Hague. 378 pp., 35 pl.Google Scholar
Kliment, J. 1899. Čeští brouci, Dílo o broucích Čech, Moravy a Slezka. Deutschbrod. 811 pp., 46 pl.Google Scholar
Knisch, A. 1919. Zur Kenntnis der palaearktischen Hydrophiliden (I. Beitrag). Ent. Bl. 15: 11–16.Google Scholar
Knisch, A. 1924. Hydrophilidae. Junk et Schenkling, Coleopterorum Catalogus XIV, pars 79. Berlin. 306 pp.Google Scholar
Kolbe, H.J. 1893. Ueber den Gattungsnamen Hydrophilus. Stettin. ent. Ztg 54: 204–205.Google Scholar
Kuhn, K. 1858. Die Käfer des südbayerischen Flachlandes analytisch beschrieben. Augsburg. 8 + 400 pp., 1 pl.Google Scholar
Kuhnt, P. 1913. Illustrierte Bestimmungs-Tabellen der Käfer Deutschlands. Stuttgart. 10 + 1138 pp.Google Scholar
Küster, H.C. 1844. Die Käfer Europas. Pt. l. Nürnberg. 100 sheets.Google Scholar
Kuwert, A. 1890. Bestimmungstabellen der europäischen Coleopteren. XIX. Heft. Hydrophilidae. I. Abteilung Hydrophilini. Brünn. 121 pp.Google Scholar
Lacordaire, J.T. 1854. Histoire naturelle des insectes … Genera des Coléoptères Vol. 2. Paris. 548 pp.Google Scholar
Lameere, A. 1900. Manuel de la faune de Belgique. Vol. 2. Bruxelles. 857 pp.Google Scholar
Laporte, F.L. (Castelnau.) 1840. Histoire naturelle des animaux articulés. Vol. 2. Nécrophages — Trimères. Paris. 564 pp., pl. 1–38.Google Scholar
Latreille, P.A. 1796. Précis des caractères génériques des insectes, disposés dans un ordre naturel. Brive. 201 pp.Google Scholar
Latreille, P.A. 1804. Histoire naturelle, générale et particulière, des crustacés et des insectes. Vol. X. Paris. 445 pp.Google Scholar
Latreille, P.A. 1810. Considérations générales sur l'ordre naturel des animaux composant les classes des crustacés, des arachnides, et des insectes avec un tableau méthodique de leurs genres disposés en familles. Paris. 444 pp.Google Scholar
Latreille, P.A. 1825. Familles naturelles du règne animal, exposées succinctement et dans un ordre analytique, avec l'indication de leurs genres. Paris. 570 pp.Google Scholar
Leach, W.E. 1815. Entomology. In Brewster, Edinburgh Encyclopaedie. Vol. 9. Edinburgh. pp. 57–172.Google Scholar
Leach, W.E. 1817. The zoological miscellany. Vol. III. London. 151 pp., pl. 121–150.Google Scholar
LeConte, J.L. 1855. Synopsis of the Hydrophilidae of the United States. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 1: 356–375.Google Scholar
LeConte, J.L. 1859. The complete writings of Th. Say on the entomology of North America. Vol. II. New York. V + 814 pp.Google Scholar
LeConte, J.L. 1861 a. Classification of the Coleoptera of North America. Washington. 25 + 286 pp.Google Scholar
LeConte, J.L.1861 b. New species of Coleoptera inhabiting the Pacific district of the United States. Proc. Acad. not. Sci. Philad. 13: 338–359.Google Scholar
LeConte, J.L. 1863. List of the Coleoptera of North America. Part I. Smithson. misc. Collns 140. 56 pp.Google Scholar
LeConte, J.L. and Horn, G.H.. 1883. Classification of the Coleoptera of North America. 2nd ed. Smithson. misc. Collns 507. XXXVIII + 567 pp.Google Scholar
Leech, H.B. 1948. Contributions toward a knowledge of the insect fauna of Lower California. No. 11. Coleoptera: Haliplidae, Dytiscidae, Gyrinidae, Hydrophilidae, Limnebiidae. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. San Franc. (4) 24: 375–483, 2 pl.Google Scholar
Leech, H.B. 1955. Records of water beetles from Manchuria and Siberia (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae, Hydrophilidae). Pan-Pacif. Ent. 31: 80–82.Google Scholar
Leech, H.B. 1956. (Aquatic Coleoptera, part). pp. 293–371in Usinger, R.L., Aquatic Insects of California. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Linné, C. 1758. Systema Naturae … Ed. X., Vol. I. Holmiae. 2 + 824 pp.Google Scholar
Linné, C. 1761. Fauna Suecica. Ed. 2. Stockholmiae. 578 pp., 2 pl.Google Scholar
Linné, C. 1767. Systema Naturae … Ed. XII, part 2. Holmiae. pp. 533–1327.Google Scholar
Linsley, E.G. 1940. The origin and distribution of the Cerambycidae of North America, with special reference to the fauna of the Pacific slope. Proc. Sixth Pacif. Sci. Congr. IV: 269–282.Google Scholar
Lohse, G.A. 1971. Hydrophilidae,2. Unrerfamilie: Hydrophilinae. pp. 141–156in Freude, Harde, , Lohse, , Die Käfer Mitteleuropas. Vol. III. Krefeld.Google Scholar
Lüderwaldt, H. 1897. Eine neue Psammophila-Art und eine neue Varietät des Hydrous caraboides F. Stettin. ent. Ztg 63: 125–126.Google Scholar
Lydekker, R. 1896. A geographical hisrory of mammals. Cambridge (England). XII + 400 pp.Google Scholar
Lyonnet, P. 1832. Recherches sur l'anatomie et les métamorphoses de différentes espèces d'insectes, ouvrage posthume, publié par W. de Haan. Paris. 4 + 580 pp., 54 pl.Google Scholar
Malcolm, S.E. 1971. The water beetles of Maine: including the families Cyrinidae, Haliplidae, Dytiscidae, Noteridae, and Hydrophilidae. Tech. Bull. Univ. Maine 48. 49 pp.Google Scholar
Marcu, O. 1932. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Stridulationsorgane von Hydrophilus und Hydrobius. Zool. Anz. Leipzig 100: 80–81.Google Scholar
Marsham, T. 1802. Entomologia Britannica. I. Coleoptera. London. 31 + 548 pp.Google Scholar
Matta, J.F. 1974. The Insects of Virginia: No. 8. The aquatic Hydrophilidae of Virginia (Coleoptera: Polyphaga). Res. Div. Bull. 94. Virg. Polytech. Insr. and Srare Univ., Blacksburg. 44 pp.Google Scholar
Medvedev, L.N. 1965. Hydrophilidae. pp. 88–94in Bej-Bienko, , Opredelitel nasekomykh evrop. chasti SSSR. Vol. II. Moskva-Leningrad.Google Scholar
Meinert, F.V.A. 1897. Om mundbygmngen hos insekterne. Overs. Danske Vidensk. Selsk. Forh.: 299–324.Google Scholar
Méguignon, A. 1937. Observations sur quelques noms de genre I. Hydrophilus ou Hydrous? Bull. Soc. ent. Fr. 42: 53–55.Google Scholar
Merriam, C.H. 1892. The geographic distribution of life in North America with special reference to Mammalia. Proc. biol. Soc. Wash. 1: 1–64.Google Scholar
Miller, D.C. 1965. (Family Hydrophilidae [exclusive Elophorinae and Sphaeridiinae].) pp. 21–61in Hatch, M.H., The Beetles of the Pacific Northwest. Part IV.Google Scholar
Morioka, T. 1955. Description of four species of the Japanese hydrophilid larvae (in Japanese). Shin Konchû, Tokyo 8: 15–18.Google Scholar
Morley, C. 1902. Field notes on stridulation. Entomologist's mon. Mag. 38: 249–250.Google Scholar
Motschulsky, V. de. 1845. Remarques sur la collection de Coléoptères Russes de M. Article I. Bull. Soc. imp. natural. Moscou 18, 1. 127 pp., 3 pl.Google Scholar
Müller, O.F. 1764. Fauna Insectorum Fridrichsdalina … Hafnae et Lipsiae, 24 + 96 pp.Google Scholar
Müller, O.F. 1776. Zoologiae Danicae Prodromus, … Hafniae. 32 + 282 pp.Google Scholar
Mulsant, E. 1844. Histoire naturelle des Coléoptères de France. Palpicornes. Paris. 7 + 196 pp., I pl.Google Scholar
Mutchler, A.J. 1931. Genotype designations of the genera Hydrophilus and Hydrochara. Am. Mus. Novit. 507. 3 pp.Google Scholar
Nakane, T., Ohbayashi, K., Nomura, S., and Kurosawa, Y.. 1965. Iconographia Insectorum Japonicorum colore naturali edita. Vol. II.(Coleoptera). Tokyo. 443 pp., 192 pl.Google Scholar
Nitzsch, C.L. 1811. Ueber das Athmen der Hydrophilen, Reil Arch. 10: 440–458.Google Scholar
Noonan, G.R. 1973. The Anisodactylines (Insecta: Coleoptera: Carabidae: Harpalini): classification, evolution, and zoogeography. Quaest. ent. 9: 266–480.Google Scholar
Ochs, G. 1923. Hydrophilus coraboides L. var. flaviventrs m. nov. var. Ent. Bl. 19: 46.Google Scholar
Olivier, A.G. 1790. Entomologie, ou histoire naturelle des Insectes, ?… Vol. 2. Paris. 485 pp., 63 pl.Google Scholar
Olivier, A.G. 1792. Encyclopédie méthodique. Dictionnaire des Insectes. Vol. 7. Paris. 827 pp.Google Scholar
Olivier, A.G. 1794. Entomologie, ou histoire naturelle des Insectes,… Vol. 3. Paris. 557 pp., 65 pl.Google Scholar
d'Orchymont, A. 1912. Contribution à l'étude des genres Sternolophus Solier, Hydrophilus Leach, Hydrous Leach (Fam. Hydrophilidae). Mém. Soc. ent. Belg. 19: 53–72.Google Scholar
d'Orchymont, A. 1913. Contribution à l'étude des larves hydrophilides. Ann. Biol. lac. 6: 173–214.Google Scholar
d'Orchymont, A. 1919 a. Contribution à l'étude des sous-familles des Sphaeridiinae et les Hydrophilinae (Col., Hydrophilidae). Annls Soc. ent. Fr. 88: 105–168.Google Scholar
d'Orchymont, A. 1919 b. Matériaux pour servir à l'étude de la faune entomologique de l'Indo-Chine Palpicornia (Col.). Annls Soc. ent. Belg. 59: 70–83.Google Scholar
d'Orchymont, A. 1933. Conrribution à l'étude des Palpicornia. VIII. Bull. Annls Soc. ent. Belg. 73: 271–313, pl. V.Google Scholar
d'Orchymont, A. 1937. Changements de noms de genres. L'“Opinion” 11. Bull. Annls Soc. ent. Belg. 11: 423–432.Google Scholar
Panzer, G.W.F. 1793–1809. Faunae Insectorum Germanicae initia oder Deutschlands Insecten. Nürnberg. 108 Hefte.Google Scholar
Panzer, G.W.F. 1795. Entomologia Germanica exhibens insecta per Germaniam indigena … I. Eleutherata. Norimbergae. 368 pp., 12 pl.Google Scholar
Paulian, P. 1958. Le peuplement entomologique de Madagascar. Proc. 10th int. Congr. Ent. (Montréal, 1956) 1: 789–794.Google Scholar
Paykull, C. 1798. Fauna Suecica, Insecta (Col.). Bd. I. Upsaliae. 8 + 358 pp.Google Scholar
Perkins, V.R. 1879. Notes on Spercheus emarginatus, & c. Entomologist 12: 214–216.Google Scholar
Plavil'shchikov, N.N. 1957. Opredelitel' nasekomvkh. Ed. 3. Moskva. 548 pp.Google Scholar
Porta, A. 1929. Fauna Coleopterorum Italica. III. Piacenza. 466 pp.Google Scholar
Portevin, G. 1931. Histoire naturelle des Coléoptères de France. Tome 11. Polyphaga: Lamellicornia, Palpicornia, Diversicornia. Paris. 542 pp., pl. VI–X.Google Scholar
Portier, P. 1912. Recherches physiologiques sur les insectes aquatiques. Arch. Zool. exper; (5), 8: 89–379.Google Scholar
Provancher, L. 1877. Petite Faune Entomologique du Canada précédée d'un Traité élémentaire d'Entomologie. Vol. I. Les Coléoptères. Québec. VIII + 785 pp.Google Scholar
Rapp, O. 1933. Die Käfer Thüringens unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der faunistisch-oekologischen Geographie. I. Band. Erfurt. 769 pp.Google Scholar
Redtenbacher, L. 1845. Die Gattungen der deutschen Kaefer-Fauna nach der analytischen Methode bearbeitet, nebsr einem kurz gefassten Leitfaden, Studium dieses Zweiges der Entomologie. Wien. 177 pp.Google Scholar
Redtenbacher, L. 1849, 1858, 1874. Fauna Austriaca. Die Käfer, nach der analytischen Methode bearbeitet. Ed. 1, 2, and 3. Wien, ed. 1: 27 + 883 pp., 2 pl.;Google Scholar
Redtenbacher, L. 1849, 1858, 1874. Fauna Austriaca. Die Käfer, nach der analytischen Methode bearbeitet. ed. 2: 136 + 1017 pp., 2 pl.;Google Scholar
Redtenbacher, L. 1849, 1858, 1874. Fauna Austriaca. Die Käfer, nach der analytischen Methode bearbeitet. ed. 3: Vol. I.: 564 pp., Vol. II.: CLIII + 571 pp., 2 pl.Google Scholar
Régimbart, M. 1903. Coléoptères aquatiques (Haliplidae, Dytiscidae, Gyrinidae et Hydrophilidae) recueillis dans le sud de Midagascar par M. Ch. Alluaud (Juillet 1900 — mai 1901). Annls Soc. ent. Fr. 12: 1–51.Google Scholar
Régimbart, M. 1906. Voyage de M. Ch. Alluaud dans l'Afrique orientale. Dytiscidae, Gyrinidae, Hydrophilidae. Annls Soc. ent. Fr. 75: 235–278.Google Scholar
Régimbart, M. 1947. Hydrophilides provenant du voyage de M.L. Fea dans l'Afrique Occidentale. Annali Mus. civ. Stor. nat. Genova 43: 46–62.Google Scholar
Reitter, E. 1909 a. Fauna Germanica. Die Käfer des Deutschen Reiches, II. Stuttgart. 392 pp., pl. 41–80.Google Scholar
Reitter, E. 1909 b. Coleoptera (Heft 3 u. 4). in Brauer, A. (Ed.), Die Süsswasserfauna Deutschlands. Jena. 235 pp.Google Scholar
Rengel, C. 1898. Über die periodische Abstossung und Neubildung des gesammten Mitteldarmepithels bei Hydrophilus, Hydrous und Hydrobius. Z. wiss. Zool. 63: 440–455 pl. 23.Google Scholar
Rey, C. 1885. Histoire naturelle des Coléoptères de France. Palpicornia (2nd ed.). Beaune. 314 pp., 2 pl.Google Scholar
Richmond, E.A. 1920. Studies on the biology of the aquatic Hydrophilidae. Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist. 42. 94 pp., pl. I–XVI,Google Scholar
Roger, O. 1875. Das Flügelgeäder der Käfer. Zugleich ein fragmentarer Versuch zur Auffassung der Käfer im Sinne der Descendenztheorie. Erlangen. IV + 90 pp.Google Scholar
Rösel, A.J. 1749. Insecten-Belustigung. Vol. 2. Nürnberg.Google Scholar
Rossi, P. 1790. Fauna Etrusca, siJteni Insecta, quae in provinciis Florentina et Pisana praesertim collegit. 2 vols. Luburni. 272 and 348 pp., 10 pl.Google Scholar
Rossi, P. 1792–1794. Mantissa Insectorum, … Pisa. 148 + 154 pp., 8 pl.Google Scholar
Rossi, P. 1795. In Hellwig: Fauna Etrusca sistens Insecta quae in provinciis … Vol. 1 Helmstadii. 28 + 457 pp., 11 pl.Google Scholar
Roth, W. 1909. Studien über konvergente Formbildung an den Extremitäten schwimmender Insekten. Teil 2: Coleoptera. Int. Revue Hydrobiol. 2: 668–714, 1 pl.Google Scholar
Roubal, J. 1930. Katalog Coleopter (brouků) Slovenska a Podkarpatska. Vol. I. Bratislava. 527 pp.Google Scholar
Sahlberg, C.R. 1834. Insecta Fennica, dissertationibus academicis 1817–1834 editis. Helsingfors. 519 pp.Google Scholar
Sahlberg, J. 1913. Coleoptera mediterranea orientalia, quae in Aegypto, Palaestina, Syria, Caramania atque in Anatolia occidentali anno 1904 collegerunt John Sahlberg et Unio Saalas. Oefvers. Finsk. Vet. Soc. Förh. 55(19): 1–281.Google Scholar
Say, T. 1823. Descriptions of Coleopterous Insects collected in the late expedition to the Rocky Mountains, performed by order of Mr. Calhoun, Secretary of War, under the command of Major Long. J. Acad. nat. Hist. Philad. 3: 139–216.Google Scholar
Schaufuss, C. 1916. In Calwer, , Käferbuch, Naturgeschichte der Käfer Europas. Ed. 6. Stuttgarr. 1390 pp., III + 48 pl.Google Scholar
Schidöte, J.C. 1862, 1872. De Metamorphosi Eleutheratorum Observationes: Bidrag till Insekrernes Udviklingshistorie. Nat. Tidskr. (3), 1: 193–232, pl. I–VIII;Google Scholar
Schidöte, J.C. 1862, 1872. De Metamorphosi Eleutheratorum Observationes: Bidrag till Insekrernes Udviklingshistorie. Nat. Tidskr. (3), 8: 165–226, pl. I–IX.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Schwedt, E. 1891. pp. 51–122in Zacharias, , Die Tier- und Pflanzenwelt des Süsswassers. Kerfe und Kerfelarven des süssen Wassers, besonders der stehenden Gewässer. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Schrank, F. 1781. Enumeratio Insectorum Austriae indigenorum. Klett. 9 + 548 pp., 4 pl.Google Scholar
Schrank, F. 1798. Fauna Boica. Vol. 1. Nürnberg. 292 pp.Google Scholar
Sclater, P.L. 1858. On the general geographical distribution of the members of the class Aves. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. (Zool.) 2: 130–145.Google Scholar
Seidlitz, G.C.M. 1872–1875. Fauna Baltica. Die Käfer (Coleoptera) der Ostseeprovinzen Russlands. Ed. 1. Dorpat. 12 + XLII + 142 + 560 pp.Google Scholar
Seidlitz, G.C.M. 1887–1891. Fauna Baltica. Die Käfer (Coleoptera) der deutschen Ostseeprovinzen Russlands. Ed. 2. Königsberg. 10 + LVI + 818 pp.Google Scholar
Seidlitz, G.C.M. 1891. Fauna Transsylvanica. Die Käfer (Coleoptera) Siebenbürgens. Königsberg. LVI + 914 pp., 1 pl.Google Scholar
Semenov, A. 1900. Coleoptera asiatica nova. X. Horae Soc. ent. Ross. 34: 577–598.Google Scholar
Semenov, A. 1935. Predely i zoogeograficheskie podrazdelenija Palearkticheskoi oblasti dlia nazemnykh sukhoputnykh zhivotnykh na osnovanii geograficheskovo raspredelenija zhestkokrylykh nasekomykh. Trudy Zool. Inst. Ak. nauk SSSR 2: 397–410, 1 map.Google Scholar
Sharp, D. 1873. III. The Water Beetles of Japan. Trans. r. ent. Soc. Lond.: 45–67.Google Scholar
Sharp, D. 1884. The water-beetles of Japan. Trans. r. ent. Soc. Lond.: 439–464.Google Scholar
Slosser-Klekovski, J.C. 1877–1879. Fauna kornjashah Trojedne Kraljevine. Zagreb. LVIII + 995 pp.Google Scholar
Smetana, A. 1974. Revision of the genus Cymbiodyta Bed. (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 93. IV + 113 pp.Google Scholar
Smetana, A. 1978. Revision of the subfamily Sphaeridiinae of America north of Mexico (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 105. 292 pp.Google Scholar
Smith, A.G. and Hallam, A.. 1970. The fit of the southern continents. Nature, Lond. 225: 139–144.Google Scholar
Solier, A.J.J. 1834. Observations sur la tribu des Hydrophiliens, et principalement sur le genre Hydrophilus de Fabricius. Annls Soc. ent. Fr. 3: 299–318.Google Scholar
Solsky, S.M. 1876. Coleoptera I. In Fedchenko, , Puteshestvye v Turkestan. Vol. II. Moskva, IV + 222 pp.Google Scholar
Spry, W.J. 1840. In Shuckard, , The British Coleoptera delineated by W.J. Spry consisting of figures of all the genera of British beetles. London. 83 pp., 94 pl.Google Scholar
Steinke, G. 1920. Die Stigmen der Käferlarven. Arch. Naturgesch. 85 (A) 7: 1–58.Google Scholar
Stephens, J.F. 1829. Illustrations of British Entomology … Mandibulata. Vol. 2. London. 200 pp., pl. 10–15.Google Scholar
Stephens, J.F. 1839. A manual of British Coleoptera, or beetles … London. 443 pp.Google Scholar
Steven, C. 1808. In Schönherr, , Synonymia Insectorum, oder: Versuch einer Synonymie Aller bisher bekannten Insecten; … Erster Band. Eleutherata oder Käfer. Zweiter Theil Spercheus — Cryptocephalus. Stockholm. X + 424 pp., pl. 4.Google Scholar
Stierlin, W.G. 1900. Fauna Coleopterorum helvetica. Die Käferfauna der Schweiz nach der analytischen Methode bearbeitet. Schauffhausen. XII + 667 pp.Google Scholar
Sturm, J. 1835. Deutschlands Fauna in Abbildungen nach der Natur mit Beschreibungen. Vol. 9. Nürnberg. 120 pp., pl. 203–216.Google Scholar
Sturm, J. 1843. Catalog der Käfersammlung von J. Sturm. Nürnberg. 12 + 386 pp., 6 pl.Google Scholar
Thomson, C.G. 1853. Oefversigt af de i Sverige funna arter af Familien Palpicornia. Oefvers. Vet. Acad. Förh. 10: 40–58.Google Scholar
Thomson, C.G. 1859, 1860, 1867. Skandinaviens Coleoptera, synoptiskt bearbetade. Vols. I, II, III. Lund. Vol. I, 304 pp.; Vol. II, 290 pp.; Vol. IX, 407 pp.Google Scholar
Tullgren, A. and Wahlgren, E.. 1920–1922. Svenska Insekter. En orienterande handbok vid studiet av vårt lands insektefauna. Stockholm. VIII — 812 pp., 9 pl.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, E.C. 1940. The origin and distribution of the coleopterous insect fauna of North America. Proc. Sixth Pacif. Sci. Congr. IV: 255–268.Google Scholar
Vávra, A. 1934. Dve nové barevné odrůdy Coleopter z Podkarp. Rusi. Acta Soc. ent. Čechoslov. 31: 174.Google Scholar
Vogt, H. 1956. Massensterben von Schwimmkäfern. Ent. Bl. Biol. Syst. Käfer 52: 102.Google Scholar
Wallace, A.R. 1876. The geographical distribution of animals. Vols. 1 and 2. London. 503 and 607 pp.Google Scholar
Werger, M.J.A. 1978. Biogeographical division of Southern Africa. pp. 141–170in Werger and Van Bruggen, Biogeography and Ecology of Southern Africa. The Hague.Google Scholar
Wesenberg-Lund, C. 1913. Fortpflanzungsverhältnisse: Paarung und Eiablage der Süsswasserinsekten. Fortschr. naturw. Forsch. 8: 161–286.Google Scholar
Wesenberg-Lund, C. 1915. Insektlivet i ferske vande. Kjøbenhavn. 524 pp.Google Scholar
Westwood, J.O. 1839, 1840. An introduction to the modern classification of insects; … Vol. I and Vol. II London, Vol. I: VII + 462 pp., 1 pl.; Vol. II: XI + 587 pp., synopsis 158 pp.Google Scholar
Wickham, H.F. 1895 a. The Coleoptera of Canada. XII. The Hydrophilidae of Ontario and Quebec. Can. Ent. 27: 181–186, 213–216.Google Scholar
Wickham, H.F. 1985 b. On the larvae of Hydrocharis obtusatus and Silpha surinamensis. Ent. News 6: 168–171, pl. 6, fig. 1.Google Scholar
Wickham, H.F. 1904. Reduplication of the tarsus in Hydrocharis. Ent. News 15: 237–238.Google Scholar
Wilson, C.B. 1923. Water beetles in relation to pondfish culture, with life histories of those found in fishponds at Fairport, Iowa. Bull. Bur. Fish. 39: 231–345, 148 figs.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, D.P. 1967. The aquatic Hydrophilidae of Illinois. Trans. Ill. Acad. Sci. 60: 422–431.Google Scholar
Young, F.N. 1954. The water beetles of Florida. Univ. Fla Stud. biol. Sci. Ser., Vol. V, No.1. 238 pp.Google Scholar
Zaitsev, F.A. 1908. Catalogue des Coléoptères aquatiques des familles des Dryopidae, Georyssidae, Cyathoceridae, Heteroceridae et Hydrophilidae. Horae Soc. ent. Ross. 38: 283–420.Google Scholar
Zaitsev, F.A. 1919 a. Novyj vid' roda Hydrophilus (Deg.) Leacb iz' iuzhnoi chasti Kryma (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae). Rev. Russe Ent. 8: 148–150.Google Scholar
Zaitsev, F.A. 1909 b. Analytische Übersicht der mir bekannten Arten der Gattung Sternolophus Solier nebst Bemerkungen über die anderen Arten dieser Gattung (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae). Rev. Russe Ent. Ent. 8: 228–233.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, C. 1869. Synonymical notes on Coleoptera of the United States, with descriptions of new species, from the Mss. of the late Dr. C. Zimmermann. Edited by LeConte, John L., M.D. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 2: 243–259.Google Scholar