Achtelig, M. and Kristensen, N.P.. 1973. A re-examination of the relationships of the Raphidioptera (Insecta). Z. Zool. Syst. Evol. 11: 268–274.Google Scholar

Ander, K. 1939. Vergleichend-anatomische und phylogenetische Studien Über die Ensifera (Saltatoria). Opusc. Ent. Suppl. 2. 306 pp.Google Scholar

Arnett, R.H. 1963. The Beetles of the United States (A Manual for Identification). Catholic Univ. of America Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Aspöck, H. and Aspöck, U.. 1971. Raphidioptera (Kamelhalsfliegen). Handb. Zool. 4(2) (2/25): 1–50.Google Scholar

Blackith, R.E. and Blackith, R.M.. 1968. A numerical taxonomy of orthopteroid insects. Aust. J. Zool. 16: 111–131.Google Scholar

Blower, J.G. (Ed.) 1974. Myriapoda. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 32: 1–712.Google Scholar

Chapman, T.A. 1917. Micropteryx entitled to ordinal rank, order Zeugloptera. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 1916: 310–314.Google Scholar

Chopard, L. 1949. Ordre des Notoptères Notoptera Crampton, 1915; Ordre des Chéleutoptères Crampton 1915 (= Phasmoptères Jeannel, 1947) in Grassé, P.-P. (Ed.), Traité de Zoologie 9: 587–593; 594–616.Google Scholar

Clay, T. 1970. The Amblycera (Phthiraptera: Insecta). Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. 25(3): 75–98.Google Scholar

Common, I.F.B. 1975. Evolution and classification of the Lepidoptera. A. Rev. Ent. 20: 183–203.Google Scholar

Crampton, G.C. 1915. The thoracic sclerites and the systematic position of Grylloblattodea campodeiformis Walker, a remarkable annectent orthopteroid insect. Ent. News 26: 337–351.Google Scholar

Crampton, G.C. 1921. Remarks on the ancestry of insects and their allies. A. Rep. ent. Soc. Ont. 1920: 105–110.Google Scholar

Crowson, R.A. 1954. The classification of the families of British Coleoptera: superfamily 19: Stylopoidea (Order Strepsiptera auctt.). Entomologist's mon. Mag. 90: 57–63.Google Scholar

Crowson, R.A. 1955. The natural classification of the families of Coleoptera. Nathaniel Lloyd, London. 187 pp.Google Scholar

Crowson, R.A., Rolfe, W.D.I., Smart, J., Waterston, C.D., Willey, E.C., and Wootton, R.J.. 1967. Arthropoda: Chelicerata, Pycnogonida, Palaeoisopus, Myriapoda and Insecta. pp. 499–534in Harland, W.B. et al. (Eds.), The Fossil Record. Geological Society, London.Google Scholar

Dubinin, V.B. 1962. Chelicerata in Rodendorf, B.B. (Ed.), [Arthropods]. [Fundamentals of Palaeontology]. (In Russian.) Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moskva 9: 377–385.Google Scholar

Dugdale, J.S. 1974. Female genital configuration in the classification of Lepidoptera. New Zealand J. Zool. 1: 127–146.Google Scholar

Essig, E.O. 1942. College Entomology. Macmillan, New York. 900 pp.Google Scholar

Giles, E.T. 1963. The comparative external morphology and affinities of Dermaptera. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 115: 95–164.Google Scholar

Hammen, L. van der. 1977. A new classification of Chelicerata. Zool. Meded. 51(20): 308–319.Google Scholar

Hennig, W. 1953. Kritische Bemerkungen zum phylogenetischen System der Insekten. Beitr. Ent. 3: 1–85.Google Scholar

Hennig, W. 1969. Die Stammesgeschichte der Insekten. W. Kramer, Frankfurt am Main. 436 pp.Google Scholar

Hinton, H.E. 1946. On the homology and nomenclature of the setae of lepidopterous larvae, with some notes on the phylogeny of the Lepidoptera. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 97: 1–37.Google Scholar

Hinton, H.E. 1958. The phylogeny of the panorpoid orders. A. Rev. Ent. 3: 181–206.Google Scholar

Kaestner, A. 1970. Invertebrate Biology, Vol. 3. Crustacea. Wiley, N.Y.523 pp. [English translation and adaptation by H.W. and L.R. Levi of: Lehrbuch der speziellen Zoologie. Teil. 1: Wirbellose. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart: 659–979.]Google Scholar

Kamp, J.W. 1973. Numerical classification of the orthopteroids, with special reference to the Grylloblattodea. Can. Ent. 105: 1235–1249.Google Scholar

Kevan, D.K. McE. 1973. The place of classical taxonomy in modern systematic entomology, with particular reference to orthopteroid insects. Can. Ent. 105: 1211–1222.Google Scholar

Kevan, D.K. McE. 1977 a. Suprafamilial classification of “orthopteroid” and related insects, applying the principles of symbolic logic — a draft scheme for discussion and consideration. Lyman ent. Mus. and Ent. Lab. Notes 2(ed. 2). 26 pp.Google Scholar

Kevan, D.K. McE. 1977 b. The higher classification of the orthopteroid insects: a general view. In Kevan, D.K. McE. (Ed.), The Higher Classification of Orthopteroid Insects. XV International Congress of Entomology 1976. Section 1. Symposium. Mem. Lyman ent. Mus. and Res. Lab. 4: 1–31, App.(1) - (26).Google Scholar

Kinzelbach, R.K. 1971. Morphologische Befunde an Fächerflüglern und ihre phylogenetische Bedeutung (Insecta: Strepsiptera). Zoologica: 41: 1–256.Google Scholar

Krantz, G.W. 1978. A Manual of Acarology. Oregon State Univ. Book Stores, Corvallis. xx + 509 pp. 2nd ed.Google Scholar

Kristensen, N.P. 1971. The systematic position of the Zeugloptera in the light of recent anatomical investigations. Proc. XIII int. Congr. Ent. 1: 261.Google Scholar

Kristensen, N.P. 1975. The phylogeny of hexapod “orders”. A critical review of recent accounts. Z. Zool. Syst. Evol. 13: 1–44.Google Scholar

Kukalová-Peck, J. 1973. A phylogenetic tree of the Animal Kingdom (including Orders and Higher Categories). Natn. Mus. Can. Publs Zool. 8: 1–78.Google Scholar

Manton, S.M. 1970. Arthropoda: Introduction. In Florkin, M. and Scheer, T. (Eds.), Chemical Zoology 5: 1–34. Academic Press, London and New York.Google Scholar

Manton, S.M. 1972. The evolution of arthropodan locomotory mechanisms. 10. Locomotory habits, morphology and evolution of the hexapod classes. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 51: 204–400.Google Scholar

Manton, S.M. 1977. The Arthropoda; habits, functional morphology, and evolution. Clarendon Press, Oxford. 527 pp.Google Scholar

McKittrick, F.A. 1965. A contribution to the understanding of Cockroach-Termite affinities. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 58: 18–22.Google Scholar

Mutuura, A. 1972. Morphology of the female terminalia in Lepidoptera, and its taxonomic significance. Can. Ent. 104: 1055–1071.Google Scholar

Pesson, P. 1951. Ordre des Homoptères (Homoptera Leach, 1815) in Grassé, P.-P. (Ed.), Traité de Zoologie 10(2): 1391–1656.Google Scholar

Pierce, W.D. 1964. The Strepsiptera are a True Order, unrelated to Coleoptera. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 57: 603–605.Google Scholar

Poisson, R. 1951. Ordre des Hétéroptères (Heteroplera Latreille, 1810—Frontirostres Fallen, 1814) in Grassé, P.-P. (Ed.), Traité de Zoologie 10(2): 1657–1803.Google Scholar

Remington, C.L. 1954. The suprageneric classification of the order Thysanura (Insecta). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 47: 277–286.Google Scholar

Richards, O.W. and Davies, R.G.. 1976. Imms' General Textbook of Entomology. 2: 419–1354. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar

Savory, T.H. 1964. Arachnida. Academic Press, London and New York. 291 pp.Google Scholar

Savory, T.H. 1971. Evolution in the Arachnida. Merrow, Watford, England. 42 pp.Google Scholar

Savory, T.H. 1972. On the names of the Orders of Arachnida. Syst. Zool. 21: 122–125.Google Scholar

Savory, T.H. 1977. Arachnida. 2nd ed. Academic Press, London and New York. 340 pp.Google Scholar

Scudder, G.G.E. 1957. Reinterpretation of some basal structures in the insect ovipositor. Nature, Lond. 180: 340–341.Google Scholar

Scudder, G.G.E. 1961. The comparative morphology of the insect ovipositor. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 113: 25–40.Google Scholar

Scudder, G.G.E. 1973. Recent advances in the higher systematics and phylogenetic concepts in entomology. Can. Ent. 105: 1251–1263.Google Scholar

Sharov, A.G. 1968. [Phylogeny of Orthopteroidea.] (In Russian.) Trudy Pal. Inst. Akad. Sci. USSR 118: 1–217. (Also English version, 1971, Phylogeny of the Orthoptera, Jerusalem.)Google Scholar

Stekol'nikov, A.A. 1967. Functional morphology of the copulatory apparatus in the primitive Lepidoptera and general evolutionary trends in the genitalia of the Lepidoptera. Ent. Rev. 46(3): 400–409.Google Scholar

Zakhvatkin, A.A. 1952. [Division of the mites (Acarina) into orders and their position in the system of Chelicerata.] (In Russian.) Parasitol. Sborn. zool. Inst. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 14: 5–46.Google Scholar