Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T10:58:23.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A REVISION OF THE GENERA BRYOPORUS KRAATZ AND BRYOPHACIS REITTER AND TWO NEW RELATED GENERA FROM AMERICA NORTH OF MEXICO (COLEOPTERA: STAPHYLINIDAE: TACHYPORINAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Get access

Abstract

The American species of the genera Bryoporus Kraatz and Bryophacis Reitter are revised for America north of Mexico. Two new related genera are described: Bolitopunctus (type species Bryoporus muricatulus Hatch) and Neobolitobius (type species Lordithon varians Hatch).The following new species are described: Bryoporus niger, Bolitopunctus punctatissimus, Bryophacis arcticus, Bryophacis canadensis, and Bryophacis smetanai. Six new combinations are created: Bolitopunctus muricatulus (Hatch) [from Bryoporus], Neobolitobius varians (Hatch) [from Lordithon], Bryophacis discalis (Hatch) [from Mycetoporus], Bry. punctatissimus (Hatch) [from Mycetoporus], Bry. punctulatus (Hatch) [from Mycetoporus], and Bry. rubescens (Hatch) [from Lordithon].Use of the generic names Bryoporus Kraatz and Bryophacis Reitter is discussed. Lectotypes are designated for Bryoporus rufescens LeConte and its junior synonyms B. rubidus LeConte and B. flavipes LeConte, and Bryoporus testaceus LeConte and its junior synonym B. parvulus Casey.All species of Bryoporus, Bryophacis, Bolitopunctus, and Neobolitobius are described and illustrated with line drawings and scanning electron photomicrographs. Keys are provided to distinguish all genera of North American Bolitobiini and all species of the genera treated in this revision. The New World distribution of each species treated is mapped. The biology of each species, if known, is discussed.

Résumé

Ce catalogue comprend tous les noms de rang groupe-espèce des familles Trachypachidae, Rhysodidae, et Carabidae (les cicindelines inclus) correctement recensés de l'Amérique, au nord du Mexique ainsi que leurs mentions d'états et de provinces. On cite les noms valides dans leurs combinaisons actuelle et originale avec l'auteur(s), la date et la page de publication; on mentionne les synonymes dans leur combinaison originale seulement. Pour les noms de rang groupe-genre on indique l'auteur(s), la date et la page de publication, l'espèce-type, et le type de fixation de l'espèce-type. On a préféré le concept de groupe d'espèces à celui de sous-genre mais les noms sous-génériques font également l'objet de mention.

On propose et discute les changements de nomenclature suivants: Bembidion neocoerulescens Bousquet, nouveau nom de remplacement pour B. coerulescens Van Dyke, 1925; Chlaenius circumcinctus Say, 1830 pour C. perplexus Dejean, 1831; Cyclotrachelus dejeanellus (Csiki, 1930) pour C. morio (Dejean, 1828); Cyclotrachelus freitagi Bousquet, nouveau nom de remplacement pour C. obsoletus (Say, 1830); Dyschirius aeneolus LeConte, 1850 pour D. frigidus Mannerheim, 1853; Harpalus laevipes Zetterstedt, 1828 pour H. quadripunctatus Dejean, 1829; Harpalus providens Casey, 1914 pour H. viduus LeConte, 1865; Harpalus reversus Casey, 1924 pour H. funerarius Csiki, 1932; Notiophilus sierranus Casey, 1920 pour N. obscurus Fall, 1901; Pseudamara Lindroth, 1968 pour Disamara Lindroth, 1976; Pterostichus trinarius (Casey, 1918) pour P. ohionis Csiki, 1930; Stenolophus carbo Bousquet, nouveau nom de remplacement pour S. carbonarius (Dejean, 1829).

On établit 36 nouveaux synonymes et sept autres, considérés comme douteux, sont confirmés. Ces synonymes sont (avec le nom valide indiqué entre parenthèses): Agonothorax planipennis Motschulsky, 1850(= ? Agonum affine Kirby, 1837); Platynus variolatus LeConte, 1851 (= Agonum limbatum Motschulsky, 1845); Agonum nitidum Harris, 1869 (= ? Agonum melanarium Dejean, 1828); Amerinus fuscicornis Casey, 1914 et A. longipennis Casey, 1914 (= Amerinus linearis (LeConte, 1863)); Apristus fuscipennis Motschulsky, 1864 (= Apristus latens LeConte, 1848); Batenus aeneolus Motschulsky, 1865 (= Agonum exaratum (Mannerheim, 1853)); Brachystylus curtipennis Motschulsky, 1859 (= Pterostichus congestus (Ménétriés, 1843)); Brachystylus parallelus Motschulsky, 1859 (= ? Pterostichus californicus (Dejean, 1828)); Cratacanthus cephalotes Casey, 1914, C. subovalis Casey, 1914 et C. texanus Casey, 1884 (= Cratacanthus dubius (Palisot de Beauvois, 1811)); Cymindis comma T.W. Harris, 1869 (= Cymindis limbatus Dejean, 1831); Feronia praetermissa Chaudoir, 1868 (= Pterostichus commutabilis (Motschulsky, 1866)); Galerita angusticeps Casey, 1920 (= Galerita janus (Fabricius, 1792)); Gonoderus cordicollis Motschulsky, 1859 (= Pterostichus tristis (Dejean, 1828)); Anisodactylus alternans LeConte, 1851 (= Anisodactylus alternans (Motschulsky, 1845)); Hypherpes spissitarsis Casey, 1918 (= Pterostichus tarsalis LeConte, 1873); Lebia brunnicollis Motschulsky, 1864 (= Lebia lobulata LeConte, 1863); Lebia subfigurata Motschulsky, 1864 et L. sublimbata Motschulsky, 1864 (= Lebia analis Dejean, 1825); Lophoglossus bispiculatus Casey, 1913 et L. illini Casey, 1913 (= Lophoglossus scrutator (LeConte, 1848)); Platysma leconteianum Lutshnik, 1922 (= Pterostichus commutabilis (Motschulsky, 1866)); Loxandrus iris Motschulsky, 1866 (= Loxandrus rectus (Say, 1823)); Masoreus americanus Motschulsky, 1864 (= Stenolophus rotundicollis (Haldeman, 1843)); Notaphus laterimaculatus Motschulsky, 1859 (= Bembidion approximatum (LeConte, 1852)); Notiophilus cribrilaterus Motschulsky, 1864 (= Notiophilus novemstriatus LeConte, 1848); Omaseus brevibasis Casey, 1924 (= Pterostichus luctuosus (Dejean, 1828)); Notaphus incertus Motschulsky, 1845 (= Bembidion breve (Motschulsky, 1845)); Peryphus concolor Motschulsky, 1850 (= Bembidion platynoides Hayward, 1897); Peryphus erosus Motschulsky, 1850 (= Bembidion transversale Dejean, 1831); Peryphus subinflatus Motschulsky, 1859 (= Bembidion petrosum petrosum Gebler, 1833); Planesus fuscicollis Motschulsky, 1865 et P. laevigatus Motschulsky, 1865 (= Cymindis platicollis (Say, 1823)); Poecilus pimalis Casey, 1913 (= Poecilus diplophryus Chaudoir, 1876); Pterostichus arizonicus Schaeffer, 1910(= Ophryogaster flohri Bates, 1882); Pterostichus sequoiarum Casey, 1913 (= Pterostichus tarsalis LeConte, 1873); Scaphinotus grandis Gistel, 1857 (= ? Scaphinotus unicolor unicolor (Fabricius, 1787)); Stenocrepis chalcas Bates, 1882 et S. chalcochrous Chaudoir, 1883 (= Stenocrepis texana (LeConte, 1863)); Stenolophus humeralis Motschulsky, 1864 (= Stenolophus plebejus Dejean, 1829); et Stenolophus laticollis Motschulsky, 1864 (= Stenolophus ochropezus (Say, 1823)).

Olisthopus iterans Casey, 1913 et Pterostichus illustris LeConte, 1851, listés comme synonymes récents de O. parmatus (Say, 1823) et P. congestus (Ménétriés, 1843) respectivement, sont considérés dans ce catalogue comme espèces valides.

On désigne pour la première fois l'espèce-type (citée entre parenthèses) des 14 taxa suivants : Circinalidia Casey, 1920 (Agonum aeruginosum Dejean, 1828); Evolenes LeConte, 1853 (Oodes exaratus Dejean, 1831); Leucagonum Casey, 1920 (Agonum maculicolle Dejean, 1828); Megaliridia Casey, 1920 (Cychrus viduus Dejean, 1826); Megalostylus Chaudoir, 1843 (Feronia lucidula Dejean, 1828 = Feronia recta Say, 1823); Micragra Chaudoir, 1872 (Micragra lissonota Chaudoir, 1872); Onota Chaudoir, 1872 (Onota bicolor Chaudoir, 1872); Oodiellus Chaudoir, 1882 (Oodiellus mexicanus Chaudoir, 1882 = Anatrichis alutacea Bates, 1882); Oxydrepanus Putzeys, 1866 (Dyschirius rufus Putzeys, 1846); Paranchomenus Casey, 1920 (Platynus stygicus LeConte, 1854 = Anchomenus mannerheimii Dejean, 1828); Pemphus Motschulsky, 1866 (Cychrus velutinus Ménétriés, 1843); Peronoscelis Chaudoir, 1872 (Tetragonoderus figuratus Dejean, 1831); Rhombodera Reiche, 1842 (Rhombodera virgata Reiche, 1842 = Lebia trivittata Dejean, 1831); et Stenous Chaudoir, 1857 (Oodes cupreus Chaudoir, 1843).

On propose deux nouveaux noms du rang de groupe-famille, Cnemalobini (= Cnemacanthini des auteurs) fondé sur Cnemalobus Guérin-Méneville, 1839 et Loxandrini fondé sur Loxandrus LeConte, 1852.

L'ouvrage comprend aussi un synopsis de toutes les tribus de Carabidae existantes, une bibliographie de toutes les descriptions originales, un index taxonom

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blackwelder, R.E. 1943. Monograph of the West Indian Beetles of the Family Staphylinidae. Bulletin of the United States National Museum 182: 658 pp. Washington.Google Scholar
Blackwelder, R.E. 1952. The Generic Names of the Beetle Family Staphylinidae with an Essay on Genotypy. Bulletin of the United States National Museum 200: 483 pp. Washington.Google Scholar
Blatchley, W.S. 1910. An Illustrated Descriptive Catalogue of the Coleoptera or Beetles (exclusive of the Rhynchophora) known to occur in Indiana. Indianapolis, Indiana. 1386 pp.Google Scholar
Cameron, M. 1932. The Fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Coleoptera. Staphylinidae — Vol. III. London. 443 pp., 3 pls.Google Scholar
Campbell, J.M. 1973. A Revision of the genus Tachinus (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) of North and Central America. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 90: 137 pp.Google Scholar
Campbell, J.M. 1979. A Revision of the genus Tachyporus Gravenhorst (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) of North and Central America. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 109: 95 pp.Google Scholar
Campbell, J.M. 1980. A revision of the genus Carphacis des Gozis (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) of North America. The Canadian Entomologist 112: 925953.Google Scholar
Campbell, J.M. 1982. A revision of the genus Lordithon Thomson of North and Central America (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 119: 115 pp.Google Scholar
Campbell, J.M. 1991. A revision of the genera Mycetoporus Mannerheim and Ischnosoma Stephens (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Tachyporinae) of North and Central America. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 156: 169 pp.Google Scholar
Casey, T.L. 1884. Contributions to the descriptive and systematic coleopterology of North America. Part II: 61198. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Eichclbaum, F. 1909. Katalog der Staphyliniden-Gattungen nebst Angabe ihrer Literatur, Synonyme, Artenzahl, geographischen Verbreitung und ihrer bekannten Larvenzustande. Mémoires de la Société Royale Entomologique de Belgique 17: 71280.Google Scholar
Everts, J.E. 1898. Coleoptera Neerlandica. Vol. 1. 'sGravenhage. 676 pp.Google Scholar
Fauvel, A. 1866. Notes synonymiques. Bulletin de la Société Linnéenne de Normandie 10: 246249.Google Scholar
Fauvel, A. 18721875 (1875). Faune Gallo Rhénane ou Species des Insectes …. Vol. 3, Coléoptères 2. Caen. 738 pp., 4 pls.Google Scholar
Fowler, W.W. 1888. The Coleoptera of the British Islands, II. Staphylinidae. London. 444 pp., 70 pls.Google Scholar
Ganglbauer, L. 1895. Die Käfer von Mitteleuropa, II. Staphylinolidea 1. Wien. 880 pp.Google Scholar
Hansen, V. 19511954 (1952). Danmarks Fauna.…, Biller. Vol. 15, Rovbiller. Kobenhavn.499 pp.Google Scholar
Hatch, M.H. 1957. The Beetles of the Pacific Northwest. II. Staphyliniformia. University of Washington Publications in Biology 16: 384 pp.Google Scholar
Horion, A. 1967. Faunistik der Mitteleuropäischen Käfer. Band XI: Staphylinidae. 3. Teil: Habrocerinae bis Aleocharinae. Überlingen-Bodensee. 419 pp.Google Scholar
Horn, G.H. 1877. Synopsis of the genera and species of the Staphylinidae tribe Tachyporini of the United States. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 6: 81128.Google Scholar
Johansen, J.P. 1914. Danmarks Rovbiller eller Billefam. Staphylinidae's dánske Slaegter og Arter. Kobenhavn. 660 pp.Google Scholar
Korge, H. 1962. The West Indies species of the genus Bryoporus Kr., with the description of a new species (Col., Staphylinidae). Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 98: 123124.Google Scholar
Korge, H. 1963. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der tropischen Staphyliniden (Coleoptera). Reichenhachia 2: 7987.Google Scholar
Kraatz, G. 18561858 (1857). Naturgeschichte der Insecten Deutschlands. Abt. 1, Coleoptera. Vol. 2, Staphylinidae. Berlin. 1080 pp.Google Scholar
Kraatz, G. 1866. Synonymische Bemerkungen. Berliner entomologische Zeitschrift 1866: 413418.Google Scholar
LeConte, J.L. 1863. New species of North American Coleoptera, Part I. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections (Washington) (6) 167: 92 pp.Google Scholar
Lohse, G.A. 1964. In Freude, Harde and Lohse. Die Käfer Mitteleuropas. Vol. 4, Staphylinidae, Part 1. Krefeld. 264 pp.Google Scholar
Luze, G. 1901. Bolitobiini. Revision der palaarktischen Arten der Staphyliniden-Gattungen Bryocharis Boisd. et Lac, Bolitobius Mannh., Bryoporus Kraatz und Mycetoporus Mannh. Verhandlungen der Zoologischbotanischen Gesellschaft in Wien 51: 662746.Google Scholar
Lynch-Arribálzaga, F.L. 1884. Los Estafilinos de Buenos Aires. Bol. Acad. Nac. Ciencias de Córdoba 7, 392 pp. Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Moore, I., and Legner, E.F.. 1975. A catalogue of the Staphylinidae of America North of Mexico (Coleoptera). University of California Special Publication 3015: 514 pp. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Palm, T. 1966. Svensk Insektfauna. 9. Skalbaggar. Coleoptera Kortvingar, Fam. Staphylinidae Underfam. Habrocerinae, Trichophyinae, Tachyporinae. Vol. 4, pt. 9. Stockholm. 91 pp.Google Scholar
Pandellé, M.L. 1869. Etude monographique sur les Staphylins Europeens de la Tribu des Tachyporini Erichson. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 9: 261366.Google Scholar
Pope, R.D. 1977. pp. 143218in Kloet, and Hincks, (Eds.), A Checklist of British Insects. Coleoptera. London.Google Scholar
Portevin, G. 1929. Histoire naturelle des Coléoptères de France. I. Adephaga, Polyphaga: Staphylinoidea. Paris. 649 pp., 5 pls.Google Scholar
Redtenbacher, L. 1857. Fauna Austriaca: Die Käfer, nach der analytischen Methode bearbeitet [ed. 2]. Wien. 1017 pp.Google Scholar
Redtenbacher, L. 1874. Fauna Austriaca: Die Käfer, nach der analytischen Methode bearbeitet [ed. 3]. Wien. 571 pp.Google Scholar
Reitter, E. 1909. Fauna Germanica. Die Käfer des Deutschen Reiches, II. Stuttgart. 392 pp., pls. 41–80.Google Scholar
Rey, C. 1883. Tribu des brevipennes. Quatorzième famille: Tachyporiens; Deuxième rameau, Bolitobiates. Annales de la Société Linnéenne de Lyon, ser. 2 29: 13117.Google Scholar
Sahlberg, J. 1876. Enumeratio Coleopterorum Brachelytrorum Fenniae, 1. Staphylinidae. Acta Societatis pro fauna et flora Fennica [Helsingforsiae] 1: 248 pp.Google Scholar
Scheerpeltz, O. 1929. Staphyliniden aus Ostasien. Neue Beiträge zur systematischen Insektenkunde 4: 129142.Google Scholar
Scheerpeltz, O. 1930. In Winkler, A. (Ed.), Die Tierwelt Mitteleuropas. Ordnung Käfer, Coleoptera. Vol. 5, pt. 2. Leipzig. 272 pp., 51 pls.Google Scholar
Scheerpeltz, O. 1933. Staphylinidae VII. pp. 9891500in Junk, W. (Ed.), Coleopterorum Catalogus. Vol. 6, pt. 129. Berlin.Google Scholar
Scheerpeltz, O. 1959. Neue Arten der Gattung Bryoporus Kr., mit einer Bestimmungstabelle aller bis heute bekannt gewordenen palaarktischen Arten dieser Gattung (Col. Staphylinidae). Nachrichtenblatt der Bayerischen Entomologen 8: 86101.Google Scholar
Sharp, D. 18821887 (1884). Staphylinidae. pp. 145747in Godman, and Salvin, (Eds.), Biologia centraliamericana, Coleoptera. Vol. 1, pt. 2.Google Scholar
Shibata, Y. 1985. In Uéno, S.-I., Kurosawa, Y., and Sato, M. (Eds.), The Coleoptera of Japan in Color. Vol. II. Osaka. 514 pp., 80 pls.Google Scholar
Thomson, C.G. 1859. Skandinaviens Coleoptera. … Vol. 1. Lund. 290 pp.Google Scholar
Thomson, C.G. 1861. Skandinaviens Coleoptera. … Vol. 3. Lund. 278 pp.Google Scholar
Tikhomirova, A.L. 1973. Morfoedologicheskiye osobennosti i fologenez stafilinid (s katalogom fauny SSSR) [Morphological and Ecological Features and Phylogeny of the Staphylinidae (with a catalogue of the fauna of the USSR)]. Moscow. 190 pp.Google Scholar
Tottenham, C.E. 1939. Some notes on the nomenclature of the Staphylinidae, Part 2. Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London, (B) 8: 227237.Google Scholar