Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T14:45:18.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Male Genitalia as Taxonomic Characters in the Miridae (Hemiptera)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Leonard A. Kelton
Leonard A. Kelton*
Affiliation:
Insect Systematics and Biological Control Unit, Entomology Division, Ottawa, Canada
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
The Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada , Volume 91 , Supplement S11 , 1959 , pp. 5 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Contribution No. 3876, Entomology Division, Science Service, Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, Canada; in part from a thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Iowa State College in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Entomology, 1957.

2

Associate Entomologist

References

REFERENCES

Baker, A. D. 1931. A study of the male genitalia of certain species of Pentatomidae. Canadian J. Res. 4: 148–179, 181–220.Google Scholar
Bliven, B. P. 1954. New Hemiptera from redwood (Miridae, Cicadellidae). Bull. Brooklyn Ent. Soc. 49: 109–119.Google Scholar
Bonhag, P. F., and Wick, J. R.. 1953. The functional anatomy of the male and female reproductive systems of the milkweed bug, Oncopeltus fasciatus (Dallas) (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae). J. Morph. 93: 177–284.Google Scholar
Carvalho, J. C. M. 1944. Neotropical Miridae. Revision of the genus Eurylomata. Rev. Brasil. Biol. 4: 95–101.Google Scholar
Carvalho, J. C. M. 1952. On the major classification of the Miridae (Hemiptera) (with keys to subfamilies and tribes and a catalogue of the world genera). Anais Acad. Brasil. Cienc. 24: 31–110.Google Scholar
Carvalho, J. C. M. 1954. Neotropical Miridae, 78: Miscellaneous observations in some European museums (Hemiptera). Anais Acad. Brasil. Cienc. 26: 423–427.Google Scholar
Carvalho, J. C. M. 1955. Keys to the genera of Miridae of the World (Hemiptera). [Title also in Portuguese]. Mus. Paraense Emilio Goeldi, Para, Bol. 11. Fasc. 2.Google Scholar
Carvalho, J. C. M., and Sailer, R. I.. 1953. Neotropical Miridae, XLVII. The genus Ofellus Distant, 1883, with descriptions of three new species (Hemiptera). Proc. Ent. Soc. Washington 55: 234–238.Google Scholar
Carvalho, J. C. M., and Usinger, R. L.. 1957. A new genus and two new species of myrmecomorphic Miridae from North America (Hemiptera). Wasmann J. Biol. 15: 1–13.Google Scholar
China, W. E. 1944. New and little known West African Miridae (Capsidae). Bull. Ent. Res. 35: 171–191.Google Scholar
Crampton, G. C. 1922. The genitalia of the males of certain Hemiptera and Heteroptera. Bull. Brooklyn Ent. Soc. 17: 46–55.Google Scholar
Dupuis, Cl., and Carvalho, J. C. M.. Heteroptera. In Taxonomist's glossary of genitalia in insects, ed. by Tuxen, S. L., pp. 158–169. Copenhagen, Ejnar Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Hoberlandt, L., and Jordan, K. H. C.. 1944. Zur Kenntnis der Gattung Camponotidea Reut. (Het.). Sborn. Ent. Odd. Zemsk. Mus. Praze 22: 179–182.Google Scholar
Horvath, G. 1908. Les relations entre les faunes hémiptérologiques de l'Europe et de l'Amérique du nord. Ann. Hist.-Nat. Mus. Hungarici. 6: 1–14.Google Scholar
Hsiao, T.-Y. 1941. Some new species of Miridae (Hemiptera from China). Iowa State Coll. J. Sci. 15: 241–251.Google Scholar
Hussey, R. F. 1922. Hemipterological notes. Psyche 29: 109–123.Google Scholar
Kelton, L. A. 1955. Genera and subgenera of the Lygus complex (Hemiptera: Miridae). Canadian Ent. 87: 277–301.Google Scholar
Kirichenko, A. N. 1951. True Hemiptera of the European USSR [in Russian]. Akademiia Nauk SSSR, Zool. Inst., Opred. Faune SSSR (Leningrad) 42: 1–423.Google Scholar
Knight, H. H. 1916. Remarks on Lygus invitus Say, with descriptions of a new species and variety of Lygus (Hemiptera: Miridae). Canadian Ent. 48: 345–349.Google Scholar
Knight, H. H. 1917. A revision of the genus Lygus as it occurs in America North of Mexico, with biological data on the species from New York. Cornell Univ. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 391: 555–645.Google Scholar
Knight, H. H. 1918. Synoptic key to the subfamilies of Miridae (Hemiptera, Heteroptera). J. New York Ent. Soc. 26: 40–44.Google Scholar
Knight, H. H. 1922. Nearctic records for species of Miridae known heretofore only from the Palaearctic region (Heteroptera). Canadian Ent. 53: 280–288.Google Scholar
Knight, H. H. 1923. The Miridae (or Capsidae) of Connecticut. In the Hemiptera, or sucking insects, of Connecticut, by W. Britton. Connecticut Geol. & Nat. Hist. Surv. Bull. 34: 422–658.Google Scholar
Kullenberg, B. 1941. Zur Kenntnis der Morphologie des männlichen Kopulationsapparates bei den Capsiden (Rhynchota). Zool. Bidr. Uppsala 20: 415–430.Google Scholar
Kullenberg, B. 1947a. Uber Morphologie und Funktion des Kopulationsapparats der Capsiden und Nabiden. Zool. Bidr. Uppsala 24: 217–418.Google Scholar
Kullenberg, B. 1947b. Der Kopulationsapparat der Insekten aus phylogenetischem Gesichtspunkt. Zool. Bidr. Uppsala 25: 79–90.Google Scholar
Leston, D. 1952. On certain subgenera of Lygus Hahn 1833 (Hem., Miridae), with a review of the British species. Ent. Gaz. 3: 213–230.Google Scholar
Lindberg, H. 1930. Neue oder wenig bekannte Capsiden aus Turkestan und dem Kaukasus. Notulae Ent. 10: 18–22.Google Scholar
Lindberg, H. 1951. Canariocoris, eine neue kanarische Miriden-Gattung. Acta Soc. Sci. Fennicae 12: 1–12.Google Scholar
Linnavuori, R. 1951. On some new or lesser known Heteroptera. Suomen Hyönt. Aik. (Ann. Ent. Fennicae) 17: 104–108.Google Scholar
Linnavuori, R. 1952. On some Palearctic Hemiptera. Suomen Hyönt. Aik. (Ann. Ent. Fennicae) 18: 35–41.Google Scholar
Ludwig, W. 1926. Untersuchungen über den Copulationsapparat der Baumwanzen. Zeit. Biol., Abt. A, 5: 291–380.Google Scholar
Marks, E. P. 1951. Comparative studies of the male genitalia of Hemiptera (Homoptera-Heteroptera). J. Kansas Ent. Soc. 24: 134–141.Google Scholar
Michener, C. D. 1944. A comparative study of the appendages of the eighth and ninth abdominal segments of insects. Ann. Ent. Soc. America 37: 336–351.Google Scholar
Miller, N. C. E. 1937. A new genus of Malayan Capsidae (Rhynchota) from Areca palm. Bull. Ent. Res. 28: 535–537.Google Scholar
Moore, T. E. 1955. A new species of Agnocoris from Illinois, and a synopsis of the genus in North America (Hemiptera, Miridae). Proc. Ent. Soc. Washington 57: 175–180.Google Scholar
Oshanin, B. F. 1912. Katalog der paläarktischen Hemipteren. R. Friedlander & Sohn, Berlin.Google Scholar
Ossiannilsson, F. 1953. Psallus (Hylopsallus) wagneri n.sp. A new mirid (Hem. Heteropt.) from Sweden. Opusc. Ent. 18: 122–123.Google Scholar
Reuter, O. M. 1883. Hemiptera Gymnocerata Europac. Vol. 3. Helsingfors. [Also: Acta Soc. Sci. Fennicae 13: 313–496; 5 pls. 1885].Google Scholar
Reuter, O. M. 1910. Neuc Beiträge zur Phylogenie und Systematik der Miriden nebst einlcitenden Bemerkungen über die Phylogenie der Heteropteren-Familien. Acta Soc. Sci. Fennicae 37: 1–171.Google Scholar
Schmidt, K. 1939. Beitraege zur Heteropteren-Fauna Aegyptens, (Hemiptera). Bull. Soc. Fouad 1 Ent. 23: 15–31.Google Scholar
Scidenstücker, G. 1954a. Ein neuer Brachynotocoris aus Syrien (Hemiptera Heteroptera: Miridae). Beiträge Ent., Berlin, 4: 78–84.Google Scholar
Seidenstücker, G. 1954b. Dichrooscytus tauricus n. sp. aus dem Bulgar-Dagh (Hem.-Het., Miridae). Rev. Fac. Sci. Univ., Istanbul B, 19: 223–226.Google Scholar
Sharp, D. 1890. On the structure of the terminal segment in some male Hemiptera. Trans. Ent. Soc. London 1890: 399–427.Google Scholar
Singh-Pruthi, H. 1925. The morphology of the male genitalia in Rhynchota. Trans. Ent. Soc. London 1925: 127–267.Google Scholar
Slater, J. A. 1950. An investigation of the female genitalia as taxonomic characters in the Miridae (Hemiptera). Iowa State Coll. J. Sci. 25: 1–81.Google Scholar
Slater, J. A. 1956. Megaloceraea recticornis (Geoffr.), a mirid new to the eastern United States, with description of a new genus of Stenodemini (Hemiptera, Miridae). Proc. Ent. Soc. Washington 58: 116–120.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, R. E. 1935. Principles of insect morphology. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. 1953. The morphology and taxonomy of the genus Orthotylus Fieber (Hem., Miridae), with special reference to the British species. Trans. Roy. Ent. Soc. London 104: 415–449.Google Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E., and Woodroffe, G. E.. 1957. On the systematic position of Cyllecoris dispar Boheman (Hemiptera: Miridae). Proc. Roy. Ent. Soc. London B, 26: 29–31.Google Scholar
Stanger, N. W. 1942. New species of Lygus from California (Hemiptera, Miridae). Univ. Calif. Pub. Ent. 7: 161–168.Google Scholar
Stehlik, J. L. 1952. Fauna of Heteropter Hrubého Jeseníku [in Czech; summary in English]. Acta Mus. Morav. 37: 132–248.Google Scholar
Stichel, W. 1930. Illustrierte Bestimmungstabellen der deutschen Wanzen. Berlin. Lief 6–7: 147–210.Google Scholar
Taylor, T. H. C. 1947. Some East African species of Lygus, with notes on their host plants. Bull. Ent. Res. 38: 233–258.Google Scholar
Truxal, F. S. 1952. The comparative morphology of the male genitalia of the Notonectidae (Hemiptera). J. Kansas Ent. Soc. 25: 30–38.Google Scholar
Usinger, R. L. 1931. A new species of Platylygus (Miridae, Hemiptera). Pan-Pacific Ent. 7: 129–130.Google Scholar
Van Duzee, E. P. 1916. Monograph of the North American species of Orthotylus (Hemiptera). Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 6: 87–128.Google Scholar
Van Duzee, E. P. 1917. Catalogue of the Hemiptera of America north of Mexico excepting the Aphididae, Coccidae and Aleurodidae. Univ. Calif. Pub. Ent. Tech. Bull. 2.Google Scholar
Wagner, E. 1939. Alloeotomus germanicus n. sp. eine neue deutsche Blindwanzenart (Hem. Het.). Verh. Ver. Naturw. Heimatf. Hamburg 27.Google Scholar
Wagner, E. 1940. Zur Systematik von Lygus pratensis L. (Hem. Heteropt. Miridae). Verh. Ver. Naturw. Heimatf. Hamburg 28.Google Scholar
Wagner, E. 1956. On the genus Strongylocoris Blanchard, 1840 (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Miridae). Proc. Ent. Soc. Washington 58: 277–281.Google Scholar
Wagner, E., and Slater, J. A.. 1952. Concerning some Holarctic Miridae (Hemiptera, Heteroptera). Proc. Ent. Soc. Washington 54: 273–281.Google Scholar
Woodward, T. E. 1954. On the genus Felisacus Distant (Heteroptera; Miridae; Bryocorinae). Pacific Sci. 8: 41–50.Google Scholar