Unsuitable cases: The debate over outpatient admissions, the medical profession and late-Victorian London Hospitals

Keir Waddington

doi:10.1017/S0025727300063328

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Crossref Citations

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Gorsky, Martin and Mohan, John 2001. London’s Voluntary Hospitals in the Interwar Period: Growth, Transformation, or Crisis?. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 30, Issue. 2, p. 247.

Baker, Mae and Collins, Michael 2002. The governance of charitable trusts in the nineteenth century: The West Riding of Yorkshire. Social History, Vol. 27, Issue. 2, p. 162.

Mooney, Graham 2009. Diagnostic Spaces. Social Science History, Vol. 33, Issue. 3, p. 357.

Brock, Claire 2013. Risk, Responsibility and Surgery in the 1890s and Early 1900s. Medical History, Vol. 57, Issue. 3, p. 317.

Mandal, Anthony and Waddington, Keir 2015. The Pathology of Common Life: ‘Domestic’ Medicine as Gothic Disruption. Gothic Studies, Vol. 17, Issue. 1, p. 43.

Takabayashi, Akinobu 2017. Surviving the Lunacy Act of 1890: English Psychiatrists and Professional Development during the Early Twentieth Century. Medical History, Vol. 61, Issue. 2, p. 246.

Article contents

Unsuitable cases: The debate over outpatient admissions, the medical profession and late-Victorian London Hospitals

Abstract

Save article to Kindle

Save article to Dropbox

Save article to Google Drive

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests