We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Ackerknecht, E. HMedicine at the Paris hospital 1794–18481967BaltimoreJohn Hopkins PressGoogle Scholar
Berry, DMackenzie, CRichard Bright, 1789–1858: physician in an age of revolution and reform1992Royal Society of Medicine ServicesLondonGoogle Scholar
Brock, W. H‘The life and work of William Prout’ Medical History 19659101–26Google ScholarPubMed
Bynum, W. FPorter, RCompanion encyclopedia of the history of medicine19932 volsLondon and New YorkRoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Cameron, J. S.Stewart, JGlassock, Richard, J‘A historical review’, in Cameron The nephrotic syndrome1988New YorkMarcel DekkerGoogle Scholar
———‘John Bostock, MDFRS (1773–1846): physician and chemist in the shadow of a genius’ Am. J. Nephrol. 199414365–70Google Scholar
———and Hicks, J‘Frederick Akbar Mahomed and his role in the description of hypertension at Guy's Hospital’ Kidney International 1996491488–506Google Scholar
Chasis, HGoldring, WHomer William Smith Sc.D.: his scientific and literary achievements1965New YorkNew York University PressGoogle Scholar
Coley, Noel, G.‘George Owen Rees MD, FRS (1813–89): pioneer of medical chemistry’ Medical History198630173–90Google Scholar
Dezeimeris, J. EOllivier, C. PRaige-Delorme, JDictionnaire historique de la médecine, ancienne et moderne1828 –394 volsParisBéchet jeuneGoogle Scholar
Fogazzi, G. BCameron, J. SRitz, EPonticelli, C‘The history of urinary microscopy to the end of the nineteenth century’ Am. J. Nephrol 199414452–7Google Scholar
Garrison, F. HAn introduction to the history of medicine19294th ed.Philadelphia and LondonW.B. SaundersGoogle Scholar
Jacyna, S‘John Hughes Bennett and the origins of medical microscopy in Edinburgh: Lilliputian wonders’ Proc. R. Coll. Physicians (Edin.) 199727(Supp. 3)12–21Google Scholar
Major, Ralph, HClassic descriptions of disease19593rd. ed.Springfield, ILLCharles C. ThomasGoogle Scholar
Richet, Gabriel, ‘From Bright's disease to modern nephrology: Pierre Rayer's innovative method of clinical investigation’ Kidney International 199139787–92Google ScholarPubMed
Richet, Gabriel, Edema and uremia from 1827 to 1905: the first faltering steps of renal pathophysiology’ Kidney International 1993431385–96Google ScholarPubMed
—– ‘Osmotic diuresis before Homer W, Smith: a winding path to renal physiology’ Kidney International1994451241–52Google Scholar
Ritz, EKüster, SZeier, M‘Clinical nephrology in 19th century Germany’ Am. J Nephrol 199414443–7Google ScholarPubMed
––– Zeier, MLundin, P‘French and German nephrologists in the mid-19th century: the impact of Richard Bright on the continent’ Am. J. Nephrol.19899167–72Google Scholar
Warner, J. H‘Contested traditions: John Hughes Bennett and the bloodletting controversy’ Proc. R. Coll. Physicians (Edin.) 199727(Supp. 3)22–31Google Scholar
Wellcome, Henry, S‘The evolution of urine analysis: an historical sketch of the clinical examination of urine’1911 Lecture memoranda, American Medical Association, London and New York, Burroughs Wellcome and Co.Google Scholar
For further articles/papers on Pierre-François Olive Rayer see Professor Stewart Cameron'sBibliography of the History of Nephrologyhttp://www.isn-online.orgGoogle Scholar