Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:57:03.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

S. Benedict and L. Shields (eds), Nurses and Midwives in Nazi Germany: The ‘Euthanasia Programs’ (New York: Routledge, 2014), pp. 266, ISBN13: 978-0-415-89665-8 (hbk), ISBN13: 978-1-315-83261-6 (ebk).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2014

Colin A. Holmes*
Affiliation:
James Cook University, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2015. Published by Cambridge University Press. 

This is a timely, original and major contribution that will significantly increase understanding of the key role played by nurses and midwives in the Nazi’s T4 programme for the elimination of the ‘unfit’ as it operated within Germany. Two other English language texts have appeared, but both focused upon psychiatric nurses: Icke-McFarlane’sFootnote 1 groundbreaking study of the role played by nurses in the killing centres at psychiatric hospitals, and the rationales they gave for their participation, and Foth’sFootnote 2 remarkable and moving case study of an individual psychiatric patient.

This is a collection of meticulously researched and copiously referenced papers, by an international group of scholars; and, since they draw heavily on original sources, it is particularly valuable to those of us who read only English. The book begins by pulling together the key elements of the cultural, political, legislative and scientific background that led to the killings, and by describing in some detail the German nursing and health care context. The account of the legislative and organisational state of German nursing during the Nazi era appears to this reviewer to be the first available in English.

The chapter devoted to psychiatric nurses focuses on their preparation, knowledge and skills, and then moves to a short study of their functioning at Hadamar and the post-war trials. German psychiatric nurses seem to have embraced the opportunity to practise negative eugenics with a sense of relief, if not open enthusiasm, but it remains unclear to what extent the slide into mass murder was driven by scientific beliefs regarding the nature and untreatability of mental disorders, by a long-established contempt for treatment-resistant patients and growing dismissal of their rights, or by Nazi eugenic and economic arguments. Psychiatry had already adopted negative eugenics in other countries, and had long failed to protect the rights of patients, and so the possibility arises that the active participation of German psychiatry and psychiatric nurses was immanent in psychiatric ideology, and that Nazism simply created the opportunity for it to be taken to its logical conclusion.

Despite sometimes obscure English, the chapter on midwifery is especially welcome because, although neglected by historians, midwives played a crucial role in the early implementation of Nazi eugenic policies, notifying the authorities of abnormal births, following up cases, and eventually participating in the murders which preceded and continued as part of the T4 programme.

A chapter in the book describing the use of the T4 programme to teach nursing ethics brings home very powerfully the relevance of this research for today. For some years the authors have run educational courses in Australia and Israel, and here report their study comparing students’ reactions. Many of those in Australia were shocked, angered and saddened, as they learned of these events for the first time. Israeli students reacted rather differently: already familiar with the Holocaust, they were also distressed but more concerned with accounting for the Nazi nurses’ behaviour and understanding the contextual forces. The courses invigorated all students’ interest in the history and heightened their sense of commitment to high professional and personal standards.

None of the authors in the book adopt an explicit ethical standpoint or offer any theoretical interpretations, but the penultimate chapter suggests the value of viewing these events through a theoretical lens drawing on the work of Michel Foucault and the Italian political philosopher Giorgio Agamben. The author used these in his case study, noted above,Footnote 3 and they are introduced here in a way that should be accessible to most readers. He argues, in particular, that Agamben’s concept of ‘bare life’, entailing objectification and complete disempowerment, suggests obvious parallels between life in the psychiatric institutions and life in the concentration camps.

The conclusion reminds readers that nurses and midwives can readily become caught up in the machinery of oppression, wherever and whenever that exists. Nurses and midwives have been and continue to be implicated in a wide range of behaviours at odds with the values and codes of their profession, from deadly torture and forced sterilisation in South America, to abuse and neglect in the relatively sophisticated health service in Britain. One of the lessons that we should take away from this book is that this is a shared responsibility, and as much a structural product as a failure of collective and individual agency. Although the book’s editors claim that the book is ‘about the ethics of nursing and midwifery and how these were abrogated during the Nazi era’, there is actually little acknowledgement of the myriad ethical issues that it raises, and no explicit ethical analysis. This works in its favour, however, because it allows the authors to concentrate on the case material around which such analysis should develop, and avoids entering the labyrinthine philosophical arguments such an analysis will entail.

This book not only brings together the existing body of knowledge about nursing and midwifery in the Nazi era, but significantly supersedes it by drawing on an impressive corpus of primary sources, including contemporaneous diaries and biographical material, hospital case notes and other records, and post-facto legal and official documents of every kind. The result provides a useful starting point for further research, and will perhaps kick-start the long overdue examination, albeit uncomfortable, of the part played by nurses and midwives in other European countries in the practical application of eugenic policies, including those working under Nazi occupation. More broadly, it will enlarge our understanding of the susceptibility of the human psyche to the deceits of individual and organised power, regardless of where or when it arises, and can therefore be recommended not only to historians but also to philosophers, psychologists, social and political theorists, and those who assume health care leadership roles.

References

1. McFarland-Icke, B.R., Nurses in Nazi Germany: Moral Choice in History (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

2. Foth, T., Caring and Killing: Nursing and Psychiatric Practice in Germany, 1931–1943 (Göttingen: V & R Unipress, Osnabrück University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar