“Clone”: the history of a euphonious scientific term

Ursula Mittwoch

doi:10.1017/S0025727300069404

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Crossref Citations

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

2003. Recent Scholarship. Journal of American History, Vol. 90, Issue. 3, p. 1161.

Smith, John E. 2004. Biotechnology.

Pulman, Bertrand 2005. Les enjeux du clonage. Revue française de sociologie, Vol. Vol. 46, Issue. 3, p. 413.

Berardino, Marie A. 2006. Nuclear Transfer Protocols. Vol. 348, Issue. , p. 3.

Pulman, Bertrand 2007. The Issues Involved in Cloning: Sociology and Bioethics. Revue française de sociologie, Vol. Vol. 48, Issue. 5, p. 129.

Scali, Valerio 2009. Lost Sex. p. 317.

Brandt, Christina 2010. Zeitschichten des Klons. Anmerkungen zu einer Begriffsgeschichte. Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Vol. 33, Issue. 2, p. 123.

2011. Rhetorical Style. p. iv.

Fahnestock, Jeanne 2011. Rhetorical Style. p. 22.

Fahnestock, Jeanne 2011. Rhetorical Style. p. 178.

Fahnestock, Jeanne 2011. Rhetorical Style. p. 146.

Fahnestock, Jeanne 2011. Rhetorical Style. p. 61.

Fahnestock, Jeanne 2011. Rhetorical Style.

Fahnestock, Jeanne 2011. Rhetorical Style. p. 253.

Fahnestock, Jeanne 2011. Rhetorical Style. p. 390.

Fahnestock, Jeanne 2011. Rhetorical Style. p. 372.

Fahnestock, Jeanne 2011. Rhetorical Style. p. 306.

Fahnestock, Jeanne 2011. Rhetorical Style. p. 42.

Fahnestock, Jeanne 2011. Rhetorical Style. p. 239.

Fahnestock, Jeanne 2011. Rhetorical Style. p. 127.

Download full list

Article contents

“Clone”: the history of a euphonious scientific term

Abstract

Save article to Kindle

Save article to Dropbox

Save article to Google Drive

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests