Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:31:46.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Packing smooth curves in Rq

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2010

J. M. Marstrand
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, University Walk, Bristol, BS8 1TW.
Get access

Extract

In [1], [2] Besicovitch showed that it is possible to translate each straight line in the plane so that the union of all the translates has zero plane measure. More recently Besicovitch and Rado [3] and independently Kinney [12] showed that the same can be done with arcs of circles instead of straight lines (see also Davies [6]). Allowing rotations as well as translations, Ward [18] showed that all plane polygonal curves can be “packed” thus (allowing overlapping) into zero plane measure, and then Davies [7], making use of Besicovitch's construction, showed translations alone to be sufficient, although these papers in fact contained stronger results concerning Hausdorff measure; the results were further generalized in [16]. The question has naturally been asked whether the class of all plane rectifiable curves can be packed by isometries (translations and rotations) into zero plane measure, but a special case of the main theorem of the present paper shows that this is impossible. The corresponding question remains open for the much smaller class of algebraic curves, or even conies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University College London 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Besicovitch, A. S.. “Sur deux questions d'integrabilite des fonctions”, J. Soc. Phys.–Math., Perm, 2 (1919(1920)), 105123.Google Scholar
2.Besicovitch, A. S.. “On Kakeya's problem and a similar one”, Math. Zeit., 27 (1928), 312320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Besicovitch, A. S. and Rado, R.. “A plane set of measure zero containing circumferences of every radius”, J. London Math. Soc, 43 1968, 717719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Bochner, S. and Martin, W. T.. Several Complex Variables (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1948).Google Scholar
5.Chernoff, H. Sequential Analysis and Optimal Design (SIAM, Philadelphia, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Davies, Roy O.. “Another thin set of circles”, J. London Math. Soc. (2), 5 1972, 191192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Davies, Roy O.. “Some remarks on the Kakeya problem”, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc, 69 1971, 417421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Dilworth, R. P.. “Note on the strong law of large numbers”, Amer. Math. Monthly, 56 1949, 249250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Halmos, P. R.. Measure Theory (Van Nostrand, Princeton, 1950).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Hestenes, M. R.. “Extension of the range of a differentiable function”, Duke Math. J., 8 1941, 183192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Hurewicz, W. and Wallman, H.. Dimension Theory (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1941).Google Scholar
12.Kinney, J. R.. “A thin set of circles”, Amer. Math. Monthly, 75 1968, 10771081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Kolmogorov, A. N.. “Asymptotic characteristics of some completely bounded metric spaces”, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 108 1956, 385389.Google Scholar
14.Kolmogorov, A. N. and Tihomirov, V. M.. “ε-entropy and ε-capacity of sets in functional spaces”, Amer. Math. Soc. Translations (2), 17 1961, 277364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Lorentz, G. G.. Approximation of Functions (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1966).Google Scholar
16.Marstrand, J. M.. “An application of topological transformation groups to the Kakeya problem”, Bull. London Math. Soc. 4 1972, 191195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Vitushkin, A. G.. Theory of the Transmission and Processing of Information (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1961).Google Scholar
18.Ward, D. J.. “A set of plane measure zero containing all finite polygonal arcs”, Canad. J. Math., 22 1970, 815821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Whitney, H.. “Analytic extensions of differentiable functions defined in closed sets”, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 36 1934, 6389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar