Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T17:31:38.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multiplicative Invariants and the Finite Co-Hopfian Property

Part of: Structure and classification of infinite or finite groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2009

J. J. A. M. Humphreys  and
F. E. A. Johnson
J. J. A. M. Humphreys
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, U.K., E-mail: [email protected]
F. E. A. Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, U.K., E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

A group is said to be, finitely co-Hopfian when it contains no proper subgroup of finite index isomorphic to itself. It is known that irreducible lattices in semisimple Lie groups are finitely co-Hopfian. However, it is not clear, and does not appear to be known, whether this property is preserved under direct product. We consider a strengthening of the finite co-Hopfian condition, namely the existence of a non-zero multiplicative invariant, and show that, under mild restrictions, this property is closed with respect to finite direct products. Since it is also closed with respect to commensurability, it follows that lattices in linear semisimple groups of general type are finitely co-Hopfian.

MSC classification

Secondary: 20E34: General structure theorems
Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematika , Volume 55 , Issue 1-2 , December 2009 , pp. 115 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © University College London 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Baumslag, G., Dyer, E. and Heller, A., The topology of discrete groups. J. Pure Appl. Algebra. 16 (1980), 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Borel, A., Compact Clifford-Klein forms of symmetric spaces. Topology 2 (1963), 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Borel, A., On the automorphisms of certain subgroups of semisimple Lie groups. In Algebraic Geometry (Papers presented at the Bombay Colloquium, 1968), Oxford University Press (Oxford, 1969), 43–73.Google Scholar
4.Brown, K. S., Cohomology of Groups (Graduate Texts in Mathematics 87), Springer (Berlin, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Gottlieb, D. H., A certain subgroup of the fundamental group. Amer. J. Math. 87 (1965), 840–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Higgins, P. J., Categories and Groupoids, Van Nostrand (Princeton, NJ, 1971).Google Scholar
7.Johnson, F. E. A., Linear properties of poly-Fuchsian groups. Collec. Math. 45 (1994), 183–203.Google Scholar
8.Johnson, F. E. A., Quasi-rigid manifolds. Preprint, University College, London, 2007.Google Scholar
9.Margulis, G. A., Discrete Subgroups of Lie Groups (Ergebnisse der Mathematik (Series 3) 17), Springer (Berlin, 1989).Google Scholar
10.Mostow, G. D., Strong Rigidity of Locally Symmetric Spaces (Annals of Mathematik Studies 78), Princeton University Press (Princeton, NJ, 1973).Google Scholar
11.Raghunathan, M. S., Discrete Subgroups of Lie Groups (Ergebnisse der Mathematik 68), Springer (Berlin, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Rosset, S., A vanishing theorm for Euler characteristics. Math. Z. 185 (1984), 211–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Serre, J. P., Cohomologie des groupes discrets. In Prospects in Mathematics (Annals of Mathematics Studies 70), Princeton University Press (Princeton, NJ, 1971), 77–169.Google Scholar
14.Strebel, R., A note on subgroups of infinite index in Poincaré Duality groups. Comment. Math. Helv. 52 (1977), 317–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Wall, C. T. C., Rational Euler characteristics. Proc. Cambridge Philos Soc. 57 (1961), 182–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar